Буквально
custom 52738334255753555716❤🔥2👨💻1

Channel
@kejspodsousom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
148subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001818611009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kejspodsousom |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kejspodsousom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 148 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 150 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 149 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 152 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 154 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 154 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5273833425575355571 | 27 | 28.4% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 8.42% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| custom 5202215752152659066 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5434095036394387314 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Буквально
custom 52738334255753555716❤🔥2👨💻1
Это для тех девятерых гигачадов, которые готовы с ходу увольнять, продавливать и всячески карать
😁4
Так, ну я смотрю наголосовались, щас немножко похехаем и погнали разбираца
Кто заюзает ииху, тот лох, кстати.
💯4custom 54340950363943873142custom 52738334255753555711
Posted without readable text
Го викторину, я создал 🤬 От вас был хороший отклик на эту движуху, поэтому для теста помусолим одну из самых болючих тем: А вот есть у меня токсичный сотрудник 👾 Жопоболь всяческого менеджера и управа ресторана. Базовый пример: старший офик, надевший корону, либо срач кухни и зала (а мне шеф разрешил 🤡), либо просто откровенный мудила в коллективе. Поскольку менеджмент - дисциплина гуманитарная и сложно поддающая…
«ВкусВилл» уволил курьера, который отказался нести 30 литров воды на 23‑й этаж дома, в котором несколько дней не работает лифт. Первое. Это всё, что вам необходимо знать про миф о бирюзовых компаниях. Если кто‑то читал или увлекается спиральной динамикой, то для бизнеса оранжевого уровня более чем достаточно. Бирюзовость - отличная легенда, практически не жизнеспособная на практике. Второе. Смотрим приказ Министер…
custom 52022157521526590665🤔2custom 52738334255753555712👍1
23.07.26 Главный токсин Токсичным стало модно называть любое поведение, которое нам не нравится Однако, можно поставить вопрос иначе, более научно и точно: какой вид поведения сильнее всего предсказывает разводы и развалы команд? Оказывается, это Высокомерие (черта/установка). Точнее - его частое поведенческое проявление - Презрение В модели Готтмана точность предсказания разводов - около 90% Ключевые факторы мо…
custom 52738334255753555713❤🔥1💯1
В копилку управленческих ошибок, раз мы про них говорим. 🌱
Как и обещал, разбираемся с самой дорогой ошибкой. Почему именно отсутствие развития менеджмента? Мы уже поговорили про увольнение сильных и удержание слабых. И та, и другая ошибки - супердорогостоящие, особенно на длинной дистанции. Тут и LTV гостей падает, и затраты на найм и адаптацию, и временное падение сервиса при замене сотрудников - в общем, мрак… Бррр.💧 Теперь давайте посмотрим на это как на результат, а…
❤🔥3custom 52738334255753555712👍1💯1
Спасибо всем, кто поучаствовал в викторине выше! Большинство голосовавших отметили отсутствие делегирования как самую дорогую ошибку менеджера. Я согласен с тем, что замыкать на себе все процессы - грубая ошибка с далеко идущими последствиями, которые будут стоить много денег. Однако, правы оказались те шестеро, кто отметил «Не развитие своих менеджеров -1». Если есть мысли почему я отметил только этот вариант ве…
🤔3🤝2
Судя по голосованию, людей реально бесит кружка «BOSS» 😐
😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kejspodsousom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотите поиграть в викторину по менеджменту с кейсами из ресторанки?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кейс под соусом” (@kejspodsousom), 148 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kejspodsousom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.