把宏大叙事忘掉,把厚重的他人的历史和晦暗不清的未来扔掉。人生终究是自己的人生。 逝者如斯夫,不舍昼夜。
👍4

Channel
@keaichannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
150subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690036704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keaichannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 15 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keaichannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 150 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 151 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:29 | 152 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 46 | 82.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2022 to 19 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
把宏大叙事忘掉,把厚重的他人的历史和晦暗不清的未来扔掉。人生终究是自己的人生。 逝者如斯夫,不舍昼夜。
👍4
针对最近出现的“新冠阳性患者中症状较为严重(不是重症)的患者大部分接种的是科兴疫苗”观点,做一个小调查
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁3👍1
针对最近出现的“新冠阳性患者中症状较为严重(不是重症)的患者大部分接种的是科兴疫苗”观点,做了一个小调查。 这一观点的来源本身便不可信(一个没头没尾的消息截图,但现在说似乎有点马后炮的意思) 一开始看到我个人也就不以为然,但是这几天发现好几个群和频道发了这个东西,为了反驳他们(或者我自己),就做了个小调查 调查结果如下,目前已有一千人投票,去除没有感染的七百人,还剩三百人。 其中,三针全是科兴的群友占比最多,但是结果并不符合先前观点,三针、两针接种科兴的群友中,症状轻微、发烧、症状较严重的三个分类占比几乎相同,可以推断 是否主要接种科兴疫苗与是否症状表现严重并不存在相关性。 辟谣啦辟谣啦
Science文章提出机体针对新型冠状病毒奥米克戎变种的免疫应答受到先前的新冠病史影响 ,其中主要观点认为,在接种了三剂新冠疫苗后,人体免疫系统中的B细胞、T细胞针对先前的新冠病毒变体的识别和中和能力得到提高,但是这却使人体对奥米克戎本身的免疫应答减弱。 不同的SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗接种组合会导致不同的混合免疫印记模式。在接种过三剂新冠疫苗的之前未遭受感染的个体中,B.1.1.529 (Omicron)感染增强了免疫保护,但这种增强在之前因遭受原始SARS-CoV-2感染而存在免疫印记的人体中消失了。这种“混合免疫减弱(hybrid immune damping)”表明通过免疫印记,免疫识别和差异性调控遭受实质性颠覆,这可能是B.1.1.529(Omicron)疫情的特点是突破性感染和频繁的再感染,而接种过三剂新冠疫苗的人在感染后免受严重疾病的能力相对保持不变。 Science原文链接
关于Gzip的那些事儿 最近实在是太————————忙了 只能转发一下假装自己更新了(
👍10
从取名方式特色看中西方文化差异 中西方由于各自历史发展和文化传统的不同,形成了两种不同的名称体系。人名系统实际上是一种文化现象。 中国男人多用英武之词,而女人的名字往往带有美丽、娴淑、可爱的形象。 而在一个英语国家的名字一般名在前、姓在后。
🤔1🤣1
分享一个润学小知识: 葡萄牙D7签证。 不用投资,不用考语言,不用工作(这个签证也不允许你工作),零门槛,唯一的要求,就是需证明自己的被动收入>665欧元每月(投资收入,存款利息,公司分红,房屋出租等等),即可向葡萄牙领事馆申请。 该签证是「退休签证」,意为让退休的人过去消费,但实际上年轻轻的达到这个标准,也一样批准。 有移民监,每年至少连续6个月、或者不连续8个月居住在葡萄牙,5年后可获得PR。 这是目前我看到的移民发达国家最简单的方法。润学,要的就是短平快、目的国条件好、门槛低。我称之为「经济适用型移民」。
👍4
特朗普?Trump的多种释义 王牌、压制、杀手锏。Trump不只是一个名字,更蕴含着家族的祝福和美好的寓意。
👍2
卢梭——上帝创造了我,然后把模子打破 无论是好的、坏的,都不过是人的一生。曾说“我是太阳”的尼采终究是发了疯,曾经可以被毁灭而不能被打败的海明威最后开枪自杀。自己不是凡人,最后也变成了凡人。既然这样,为什么不做个凡人呢
👍4
我的全部才华都来自对我要处理的题材的热爱,只有对伟大、对真、对美的爱,才能激发我的天才。 ----卢梭《忏悔录》
👍1
薄荷时刻————我们天性的释放 薄荷这个名字听起来就是令人感到清爽透彻啊,而薄荷时刻就是我们的天性想要释放的时候。 ”每个人心里都有一个张三,但不是每个人都会成为张三“
👍4👎1
大师们——谈纽约现代艺术博物馆 在纽约现代艺术博物馆中的《记忆的永恒》、《阿维尼翁的少女》与莫奈的睡莲图画布下实则隐藏着三位大师的人生阶段与他们的思考
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @keaichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
针对最近出现的“新冠阳性患者中症状较为严重(不是重症)的患者大部分接种的是科兴疫苗”观点,做一个小调查
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2022 to 19 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小可爱的图书馆” (@keaichannel), 150 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keaichannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.