各位,我今日出冊,原地復活~ 多謝呢段時間關心過我的朋友~ 我在入面中過新冠,不過無「得重症」,瘦咗就同中COVID無咩關係,係因為其他理由。 總之我現在一切都安好~ 至於之後的事就「再講啦~」

Channel
(葵涌邨)梁錦威資訊頻道
@kc_leungkamwai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
391subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001275235433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kc_leungkamwai |
| Created | 17 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kc_leungkamwai |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 391 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 393 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 394 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 394 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 12 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
【2020年六四集會案判刑】 2020年六四非法集會案,剛在區域法院判刑。阿威被控煽惑他人參與未經批准集結及參與未經批准集結罪,被判囚9個月。 同案被告李卓人、黎智英、梁耀忠、蔡耀昌、胡志偉、鄒幸彤、何桂藍被判4個半月至14個月不等。 ———————————————- 如有街坊、朋友希望寫信予阿威,可寄信至元朗派遞局 郵政信箱 399 號,註明 梁錦威 收
#謹代牆內手足轉載 各位好,我地係前T.N.T.X成員火鳥同相忘於江湖,今次我地代T.N.T.X其他前成員出呢篇聲明,向大家再次解釋我地停運嘅原因,而搞到T.N.T.X要停運嘅主角就係其中一位成員「果粒橙」同佢女朋友,利用牆內手足謀取私利所做成。 喺講事件經過之前,想先提一下T.N.T.X成立嘅目的同規矩,本來T.N.T.X成立嘅目的係希望幫助在囚手足,俾大家用支持手足嘅作品呢個形式,盡量減輕在囚手足嘅財務壓力,加入人數不限,而T.N.T.X嘅話事權係所有有份參與嘅「牆內手足」,決定任何事都由牆內手足投票決定。 講返正題,喺T.N.T.X成立時,本身搵左其中一位手足做admin,但果粒橙女友一直搶住想一齊做,最後雖然大家唔想,但喺冇辦法嘅情況下畀左果粒橙女友做admin,而原本個位手足就分左處理其他工作。但好快大家因為佢嘅人品同辦事能力低效而後悔,並投票決定搵到代替人物後就換admin,可惜喺畀佢做admin後就返唔到轉頭…
Photo, posted without a caption
#謹代牆內手足轉載《退出T.N.T.X聲明》之三 6. 根據T.N.T.X成立時的初衷及規條,所有在囚手足如有意成為T.N.T.X成員,只要獲決策委員會表決同意,都可以加入T.N.T.X,成員人數並冇上限,一切收益會由所有成員均分而不論作品數量;唯自本年9月起直至現在,果粒橙女友及其牆外團伙私自決定拒收新會員,令T.N.T.X變成小圈子,完全違背當初成立T.N.T.X,創建在囚手足之公共平台的原意和初衷。 7. 果粒橙女友曾於T.N.T.X平台上發文聲稱籌募了200多本書籍,並且已「打爆」一眾在囚成員的入書戶口;實情上,除果粒橙本人外,我哋所能接觸到的成員並無收到任何相關書籍,而我哋對籌募過程和書本去向一無所知,唯恐果粒橙女友及其團伙喺成員不知情下,於牆外以T.N.T.X名義籌募金錢、物資或一切其他幫助而拒絕交代去向,中飽私囊。 8. T.N.T.X平台行政管理人,即成員果粒橙之女友,強佔T.N.T.X之Patreon及I…
#謹代牆內手足轉載《退出T.N.T.X聲明》之二 3. 除果粒橙本人外,T.N.T.X其他成員從未同意或授權果粒橙之女友掌管T.N.T.X網上平台的行政管理權及擔任小編,唯現時T.N.T.X的Pateron及Instagram賬號之登入密碼由果粒橙團伙擁有,在過去一段日子此團伙於牆外已三番四次越權,私自為T.N.T.X作出決策,一眾T.N.T.X成員已投下不信任票並再三聯合要求果粒橙及其女友交出或至少分享登入帳號及密碼予其他成員的代表,果粒橙和其女友在過去兩個月的交涉中一再拖延知近日直接回絕我哋所有要求,堅持一人掌控T.N.T.X。 4. 根據T.N.T.X創立時之決定,成員皆以筆名發表作品,明確規定未經決議不應公開自己或其他成員身份,所以我哋4人認為,在匿名情況下,除Pateron的訂閱收益外,T.N.T.X不應該作出任何眾籌、向特定個人或組織募款,或以T.N.T.X名義作商品銷售而獲得收益,因為這樣並不透明,亦難向公眾交…
#謹代牆內手足轉載《退出T.N.T.X聲明》之一 我哋係網上平台T.N.T.X(Pateron/Instagram)嘅前成員水果忍者、奇異果博士、蛋殼、幹你娘塞爆,今次希望透過各同路人手足好友嘅網上平台、空間向大家宣佈及聲明,尤其是有付款訂閱T.N.T.X嘅同路人,由即時起,我哋4人已經離開T.N.T.X,唔再係T.N.T.X嘅成員,一切有關T.N.T.X之運作事務,包括金錢瓜葛、內部糾紛、公眾籌募 (包括但不限於金錢、在囚物資、私人膳食、書籍、法律費用等)、商品銷售、義工及筆友招募等,一概與我哋無關,如有任何錢債或法律問題,請向現時實質持有T.N.T.X管理權之團伙,即成員果粒橙及其女友(T.N.T.X小編)和其他相關人士跟進或追究。 對於今次迫於無奈需要借助第三者之平台發表以上聲明感到非常遺憾,亦對所有訂閱、跟進T.N.T.X嘅手足、同路人深感抱歉,因為我哋4人作為T.N.T.X的成員,同時身為T.N.T.X決策委員會成…
Photo, posted without a caption
(葵涌邨)梁錦威資訊頻道 pinned a photo
小編:【召喚旁聽師】明天,9 月 15 日是六四集會案 12 人認罪判刑嘅日期,請大家關注。判刑會喺早上11:30灣仔區域法院進行,旁聽人士可預早到場旁聽聲援。
【突發】阿威被捕,辦事處將暫停開放,直至另行通知。
【重新登記消費券安排】 之前一早就講過,用咁繁複嘅方法去申請消費券不如直接派錢落戶口最實際。但正苦係唔聽人講野架啦🙂 而家真係有好多長者申請無效拎唔到錢,又要嘥市民時間同資源去再重新處理🤡 派個錢都可以派到咁多問題出嚟,香港正苦好X嘢! 收唔到消費券嘅人留意,正苦昨晚公佈: 如欲透過特別安排重新登記的市民,須先確定是次提交的資料準確及齊全,並在九月十五日或之前把填妥的書面表格,連同身份證複本親身或委托其可信賴的人士於辦公時間交到九龍旺角彌敦道750號始創中心17樓消費券計劃秘書處。 大家亦可以聽下老人家點講: 身穿藍白色格仔恤衫的伯伯情緒激動大罵:「屌你老母,搞到我哋啲老人家!」 https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E6%94%BF%E7%B6%93/%E3%80%90%E6%B6%88%E8%B2%BB%E5%88%B8%E9%A9%9A%E9%AD%82%E3%80%91%E5%91%A8…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kc_leungkamwai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(葵涌邨)梁錦威資訊頻道” (@kc_leungkamwai), 391 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kc_leungkamwai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.