Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Казаков в праве

Channel

Казаков в праве

@kazakovvprave

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

67subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003936318119
TypeChannel
Username@kazakovvprave
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kazakovvprave

Growth

6567667 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers14 August 2026 — 67 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:2667+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:3065no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:5065first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.6%
avg views ÷ 67 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.0
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total728
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2429.6%
🔥2125.9%
2024.7%
🌭1214.8%
😡44.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kazakovvprave. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

⚡️ Скоро у бизнеса появится ещё один официальный адрес, по которому государство и контрагенты смогут вручать вам требования и уведомления. И платить за этот адрес будете вы. С 1 сентября 2027 года Почта России запускает электронную почтовую систему, встроенную в Госуслуги. У всех, у кого есть учётная запись на портале — у компаний, ИП и обычных граждан — появится электронный почтовый ящик. Через него будут приходить

😡2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Самозанятый со штрафом за прогул — уже работник Развлекательное заведение оформило артистов как самозанятых: типовые договоры, оплата за выступления на сцене. Налоговая на камеральной проверке по взносам увидела в них обычных работников и доначислила почти 7,5 млн страховых взносов. Суды всех трёх инстанций встали на сторону инспекции. Подвела фактура. Договоры одинаковые, без конкретного объёма и результата, зато

🌭1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Меня за последние дни несколько раз спросили, что я думаю про новость о том, как налоговая взялась за неработающих покупателей яхт и квартир. Честно — пока ничего. И реагировать, по большому счёту, не на что. 📰 В СМИ прошла информация о запросах покупателям яхт и квартир. Внутри на самом деле никакой особой фактуры: конкретному лицу пришел конкретный запрос. Тем более что новость эта — с бородой. Историю о том, как

🌭1😡1

4 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yufmproPhoto

Ярослав Казаков, руководитель практики комплексного бизнес-консультирования, выступит в секции "Сборы/споры/поборы: утилизационный и прочие сборы". Раньше, по легенде, только один человек просил 3% с каждого контракта. Несколько лет назад практика и законодательство поменялись: за рекламу в интерете начали взимать 3% рекламный... сбор. Каждый раз хочется сказать "налог", зачеркивать, исправлять... Какова природа

👍7

30 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌎🌎 Ставка земельного налога — 1,5%. А платить некоторым приходилось как за все 6%, пока в дело не вмешался Конституционный суд. У компании были участки под ИЖС, которые она использовала в бизнесе. Раньше земля под жильё — любое, включая коммерческую застройку — облагалась по льготной ставке 0,3%. К этой ставке закон добавлял повышающие коэффициенты 2 и 4, чтобы застройщик не держал участок пустым годами, а достраива

1🌭1

29 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📚 #книгипосредам Впервые в рубрике книга, которая в меня не попала. 📖 «Последнее дело майора Чистова», Евгений Водолазкин Сразу предупреждение: если открываете её как детектив — закрывайте. Убийство и следствие формально есть, но автора занимает совсем не «кто убийца». Убивают учёного, изучавшего искусственный интеллект, и через это дело книга выруливает на вопрос о душе — о том, что вообще делает человека человек

🌭1👍1

28 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🏢 Аргумент «мы так работаем семь лет» сыграл против компании Оптовый поставщик лекарств на упрощёнке годами работал в паре с компанией: тот же товар, один заказчик на двоих, общие телефоны, интернет, IP-адрес и сотрудники. Совокупный доход держался у самой границы лимита, пока её не перешли из-за процентов по вкладам. По итогам проверки доходы группы консолидировали и доначислили почти 49 миллионов НДС и налога на п

🌭1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC50 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📩 «Достраиваем комплекс, реконструкция ещё идёт. Один этаж уже сдали арендатору. Налог на имущество платить со всего здания или только с этого этажа? В учёте объект висит как незавершённые вложения». Коротко: со всего здания и с того месяца, когда появился первый арендатор. Почему. Для налога важно не то, на каком счёте объект числится в бухгалтерии, а способно ли здание работать и приносить деньги. Разрешение на в

👍2🌭1

23 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC46 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @datax_advokatPhoto

Что-то классное грядет Активность Счетной палаты и Прокуратуры в гонке за налогами, кажется, только усиливается и не планирует заканчиваться! Поэтому коллеги из 💙💙💙 не смогли пройти мимо этой темы — и любезно пригласили нас с Даниилом Андреичем как главных экспертов в налоговых спорах со Счетной палатой записать подкаст об этих новых «сборщиках податей». Обсудили с Ярославом актуальную судебную практику и грядущие

👍31

23 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🎙Готовим с коллегами новый подкаст на очень актуальную и важную тему - увидимся в эфире

2

23 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC79 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🧾 Минфин переписывает правила: за что теперь можно попасть под проверку по ККТ Ведомство готовит новый перечень признаков, по которым инспекция решает — идти к вам с проверкой кассовой техники или нет. Уведомление о будущем приказе уже опубликовано для общественного обсуждения. Пока список короткий — всего три сигнала, и достаточно одного из них. 1. Касса зарегистрирована, но 60 дней подряд не присылает чеки в сис

3🌭1

22 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📚 #книгипосредам После двух книг про большой бизнес и лихие времена потянуло на тёплое и человеческое. 📖 «Тревожные люди», Фредрик Бакман Всё начинается с провалившегося ограбления банка: незадачливый грабитель убегает и случайно запирается вместе с восемью заложниками на просмотре квартиры, которую как раз продают. Хитросплетения судеб всех, на первый взгляд случайных людей, показывает, что за каждый из нас кажды

2🌭2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kazakovvprave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,308,203 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Казаков в праве” (@kazakovvprave), 67 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazakovvprave.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.