Channel
@kawoxru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001524801495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kawoxru |
| Description | Данный канал содержит нецензурные выражения и сцены насилия поэтому его не стоит читать никому. Лс: @kaw0xru |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kawoxru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 47 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 January 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 143 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
541 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5379769193363179936 | 196 | 36.2% | |
| custom 5467659982474346158 | 108 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5467659999654215599 | 79 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5249324061556761862 | 53 | 9.80% | |
| custom 5355317673964111528 | 40 | 7.39% | |
| custom 5240046167693229533 | 26 | 4.81% | |
| custom 5388980244650686702 | 11 | 2.03% | |
| custom 5316755056693888132 | 9 | 1.66% | |
| custom 5283172140470798003 | 8 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5208806637166431067 | 7 | 1.29% | |
| custom 5406905556948518343 | 4 | 0.739% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kawoxru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пост в честь дня рождения одного милейшего человека и хорошей подруги🥺 🌸🌸@Tinni404🌸🌸
custom 535531767396411152820custom 53797691933631799367custom 54676599996542155996custom 53889802446506867023custom 54676599824743461582custom 52493240615567618621
В качестве вишенки на торте вчера, под конец дня, неожиданно получила ещё два замечательных арта!! Пускай тоже красуются в этом канале и радуют мой глаз🥺 1. https://t.me/iablo4nispas 🤩 2. Кто узнал тот молодец🤫
custom 537976919336317993621custom 535531767396411152812custom 54676599824743461587custom 52493240615567618623custom 53889802446506867022
Хотелось бы в отдельном посте выделить творческие подарки от моих дорогих подруг в этот прекрасный день, каждым из которых я до сих пор любуюсь!! Спасибо всем ещё раз, вы сделали меня очень счастливой🤩 1. https://t.me/Tinni404 2. @Yuurek 🤩 3. @shoowo 4. https://t.me/saraichikk
custom 537976919336317993618custom 53553176739641115287custom 53889802446506867025custom 52493240615567618622custom 54069055569485183431
Ночной пост с красивой дамой по случаю моего дня варенья🎁 Посты в этом канале исключительно по праздникам видимо-
custom 546765999965421559921custom 537976919336317993613custom 524004616769322953312custom 52493240615567618624custom 53553176739641115281custom 53889802446506867021custom 54676599824743461581
Вспомнила про функцию постинга в канале⁉️ Новая мазня карандашом с прошлогодней работой по учебе СКОЛЬКО ЗВЕЗД 😭 смущаете
custom 546765998247434615828custom 537976919336317993615custom 546765999965421559910custom 53167550566938881324custom 54069055569485183432custom 52088066371664310671custom 52400461676932295331custom 52493240615567618621
От меня рисунков пока нет, зато есть рисунок со мной...
custom 537976919336317993615custom 54676599824743461589custom 54676599996542155995custom 52493240615567618622custom 53167550566938881322custom 52088066371664310671custom 52400461676932295331
МЕНЯ НАРИСОВАЛИ🌟
custom 537976919336317993614custom 54676599824743461589custom 54676599996542155996custom 52088066371664310671custom 52400461676932295331custom 52493240615567618621custom 53167550566938881321
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 546765998247434615820custom 537976919336317993610custom 54676599996542155995custom 52493240615567618622custom 52088066371664310671custom 52400461676932295331custom 53167550566938881321
Продолжаю сидеть в фандоме, о существовании которого знает лишь автор и полтора японца🤩 Второй год подряд делаю эдит с ними 🤩 Но эта идея сидела в моей голове достаточно долго, и я поставила себе цель рано или поздно закончить её...цель достигнута, можно идти на покой
custom 537976919336317993619custom 546765999965421559911custom 546765998247434615810custom 52088066371664310673custom 52493240615567618622custom 52831721404707980031custom 53167550566938881321custom 54069055569485183431
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53797691933631799365custom 52493240615567618621custom 52831721404707980031
Друзья, вам интересна жизнь моих свинок?...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 537976919336317993611custom 52493240615567618625custom 54676599824743461583custom 54676599996542155993custom 52831721404707980031
почему ты не публикуешь жизнь своих свинок.
custom 53797691933631799367custom 52831721404707980032custom 52493240615567618621
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kawoxru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, вам интересна жизнь моих свинок?...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 82,789 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kaw0xru” (@kawoxru), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kawoxru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.