Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for از پیرآباد

Channel

از پیرآباد

@kawooss3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086087870
TypeChannel
Username@kawooss3
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kawooss3

Growth

192193192.57 August 2026 — 193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 193 subscribers15 August 2026 — 192 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:18192-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:02193no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:45193first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.5%
avg views ÷ 192 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total709
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7380.2%
👏1112.1%
👎77.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC108 viewsread 7 August 2026

با توجه به مباحثی که آقای خرازی مطرح کرده اند، دوستان را به مطالعه این یادداشت 8 سال پیش، دعوت می کنم 👆👆 https://t.me/kawooss3/1911

Signed امیر

6 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC35 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

در حالی که بعد از 1400 سال، هنوز مؤمنین باید تقیه کنند و نام افرادی که قصد ترور رسول الله را داشتند فقط در محافل خیلی خصوصی به همدیگر بگویند چون اکثریت مسلمانان، تروریست ها را صحابه نزدیک رسول الله می دانند، انتظار افشای حقایق دفتر رهبری شهید و کودتاگران فعلی که هنوز در قدرتند، انتظاری خام و دور از دسترس است.

👍5

Signed امیر

3 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

با حماقت تمام می نویسد:" باید بکوشیم دشمن را وادار کنیم به آنچه امضا کرده پایبند بماند." خب، جناب پرزیدنت و تمام جبهه اصلاحات، بفرمایید چگونه دشمن را وادار می کنید به آنچه امضا کرده پایبند بماند؟ سپاه با بستن تنگه هرمز و موشک و پهباد و بازوهای مقاومت در منطقه دارد دشمن را وادار به پذیرش واقعیت می کند، شما جماعت چه راهکار عملی برای وادار کردن دشمن به انجام تعهدات دارید؟ نکند با مذاکره و لبخند و مهربانی، می توان شرایط

👍4

Signed امیر

31 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC128 viewsread 7 August 2026

فکر می کنم مفهوم جمله " حفظ نظام، اوجب واجبات است " حالا دیگر برای همه واضح شده باشد، باید نظامی و حکومتی باشد و حفظ شود تا به چنان قدرت و توانی برسد که هم بتواند از خود دفاع کند و هم بتواند منافع دشمنان را مورد تهدید دائم قرار دهد. و الا حرکت های آزادی خواهانه و اسلام گرایانه همیشه در حد جنبش و حزب و اقلیت باقی خواهند ماند و خطر چندانی برای شیاطین نخواهند داشت.

Signed امیر

30 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC149 viewsread 7 August 2026

اون چیزی که سال ها از نابودی و فروپاشی اسرائیل از درون می گفتیم یه روندی است که با مقاومت و با این جرقه ها شروع میشه 👇👇 https://t.me/syriankhabar/58076

Signed امیر

30 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026

به نظر می رسد استراتژی ایران، عصبانی کردن ترامپ برای استفاده از سلاح هسته ای تاکتیکی باشد تا بعد از آن مجوز استفاده از سلاح های آخرالزمانی خود را پیدا کند. اکثر پایگاه های آمریکا در عربستان و اردن در بیابان های خالی از سکنه هستند و زدن آنها با موشک های مجهز به کلاهک هسته ای تاکتیکی، باعث نابودی کامل آنها بدون آسیب به غیر نظامیان می شود.

Signed امیر

17 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

برای محمد خاتمی، حسن روحانی، ظریف، پزشکیان، اصلاح طلبان و همه عاشقان آمریکا و مذاکرات با وجود حملات، تعبیر " زن کتک خور و شوهر شرور " خیلی جالب بود !

👍1

Signed امیر

17 Jul 2026, 04:29 UTC190 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

باز بودن اینترنت بین المللی، جز این که پیاده نظام رسانه ای دشمن را وارد صحنه کرده تا ملت را با واژه سازش و صلح بفریبد و دو دستگی عمیق ایجاد کند و به جای دشمن، مدافعان وطن مورد حمله قرار گیرند، چه خاصیتی برای کشور داشت؟

👎4👍3

Signed امیر

15 Jul 2026, 22:30 UTC259 viewsread 7 August 2026

آیا ایران، واقعا توانایی دارد کابل های اینترنتی که از تنگه هرمز به کشورهای عربی می رود را قطع کند؟ چرا قطع نمی کند؟ 🤔

Signed امیر

15 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC200 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من ضرب الاجل های ترامپ را واقعا برای زدن زیرساخت ها نمی دانم. گویا به عمال داخلی خود مانند خاتمی، روحانی، ظریف و ... هشدار می دهد و ضرب الاجل می دهد که یا طبق پروژه جلو بروید یا شما را هم در بمباران بعدی نابود می کنم، یا اسناد علیه شما منتشر می شود!

👍5

Signed امیر

15 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC264 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تمام اصلاح طلبان و حامیان مذاکره و " صلح شرافتمندانه " را دعوت می کنم به این سوال پاسخ دهند که ؛ وقتی طرف مقابل شرف ندارد، شرافت ندارد، به هیچ عهد و پیمانی، عمل نمی کند، هر جا زورش برسد زیر همه چیز می زند، با چنین موجودی، چگونه " صلح شرافتمندانه" ممکن است؟

Signed امیر

15 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

سرکرده اصلاح طلبان به نفع اسرائیل و آمریکا وارد میدان شد و در نقش مخالف جنگ، خیانت خود به مدافعان وطن را می پوشاند. از صلح شرافتمندانه می گوید. یعنی طرف مقابل، انسانی شریف، پایبند تعهدات و خواهان صلح است و ما هم باید با چنین دشمنی، دست صلح و دوستی دهیم. سه بار وسط مذاکرات به این کشور حمله شد و اینان همچنان از مذاکرات شرافتمندانه حرف می زنند. نه این که ذات وحشی دشمن را نشناخته باشند. بلکه اینان همیشه سربازان آمریکا در

👍5

Signed امیر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kawooss3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,045,643 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“از پیرآباد” (@kawooss3), 192 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kawooss3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.