Channel
@kavehintel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
553subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002749193397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kavehintel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 26 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kavehintel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 553 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 554 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:20 | 554 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 24.5% | |
| 🤮 | 15 | 16.0% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 13.8% | |
| 😐 | 9 | 9.57% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 🖕 | 6 | 6.38% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 3.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 29 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇵🇸⚡️🌟 Netanyahu to present Gaza-annexation plans to avert government collapse In a bid to avert the collapse of his government, Netanyahu is to present a Gaza-annexation plan to his cabinet to appease his major coalition allies Smotrich and Ben-Gvir in order to maintain their loyalty. Recently, the wicked and witless duo had again threatened to leave the coalition if aid were to be resumed to Gaza. The plan has be…
🤮13🖕6
🇪🇬🇯🇴⚡️🌟 Retired Zionist General claims Egypt and Jordan are preparing for confrontation The enemy media outlet Maariv has published an article where retired Zionist General Yitzhak Brik has made a controversial statement, claiming that Egypt and Jordan begun preparing operations and plans for confrontation with the Zionist regime. The enemy General also claimed: All the army's resources are preoccupied with Hamas,…
😐9❤1
🇺🇸🇪🇺 US Humiliates the EU — 15% Tariffs, pledged $600B Investment and $750B in Energy Purchases The US and EU's newly signed "trade deal" lays bare the profound imbalance between the relations between the two allies. The EU has, in no stretch of the truth, completely capitulated to American demands. The EU has agreed to a tariff reduction from 30% to 15% on all exports to the US, in exchange for committing to $750 …
👍4
— 🇮🇱/🇵🇸/🇺🇸 NEW: Due to the man-made famine in Gaza reaching a peak, starving over 120 people to death, including over 80 children, the Israeli military was forced to resume airdrops yesterday, with Jordan and the UAE also conducting airdrops today A group of Democratic senators, led by Chris Van Hollen, have written a letter urging the Trump administration to stop funding the Israeli-backed 'Gaza Humanitarian Founda…
💔5👍1
From the four, I can't decide which is the most pathetic but you guys can judge for yourselves. Vietnam’s deal appears less humiliating and more strategic, but it seems more targeted at China. Reducing 46% tariff to 20% in exchange for softening its economic alignment with China is not bad. It's just practical geopolitical triangulation, and they probably won't enforce the anti-dumping and origin-labelling agreement…
💯4
🇺🇸 Just Four Nations—Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines—Have Cut Tariff Deals with Trump The following are the brief agreed terms of the finalized bilateral "trade deals" made by the four countries with the US. 🇯🇵 Japan — 25% to 15% tariffs + $550 Billion Investment into US Japan avoided the original 25% tariffs by accepting a 15% tariff rate that would also include $550 Billion investment into the US …
😡3
🇺🇸 Countries To Be Targeted by Trump’s August 1st Tariffs In relation to this, approximately 22 of the world's major economies which the US maintains political leverage over will be targeted by Trump's tariffs set to come into effect on August 1st which will range between 20-50%. Every country in the world will be targeted by the baseline tariff rate of 10% and roughly 70 will be targeted with the elevated rate in …
👍5
— 🇺🇸 NEW: U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick says the Trump administration's tariffs on countries will go into effect on August 1st, with no further extensions to the deadlines. @Middle_East_Spectator
🤣4🤮2
🇵🇸 Wall Street Journal Publishes an "Opinion Article" by a Criminal That Can’t Read or Write In case you thought Western media standards couldn’t sink lower, the Wall Street Journal just gave its op-ed page to the criminal traitor Yasser Abu Shabab and are now moonlighting him as a liberator. Here's the catch, and this is completely serious, the guy is illiterate and can't read or write in his native Arabic — let a…
💩8
This is nothing more than a bigger part of the Jewish propaganda to claim they are allowing aid into Gaza. I am absolutely lost at words at how the Jordanians and Emiratis are engaging this. If this is the extent of aid they are trying to distribute, then they are an absolute disgrace to humanity. @kavehintel
💯9
🇵🇸 3 Jordanian and Emirati Aircraft airdropped 25 Tons of aid over Gaza The following footage is of the airdrops conducted by Jordanian and Emirati Aircraft. The total load of 25 tons may seem like a lot, but in reality it is absolutely nothing, not even peanuts, for hundreds of thousands of starving people. For reference, the picture of the truck attached can carry 25 tons of load. There are currently 6,000 of suc…
👍7
🌟 Four Zionist soldiers jailed for refusing to return to Gaza According to various enemy media outlets, four Zionist soldiers from the 933rd "Nahal" Brigade have been imprisoned for 7-12 days by the Zionist regime after refusing to return to Gaza, amid a manpower crisis within the enemy's army. The four soldiers claimed to have been suffering from a "deep internal crisis" due to being deeply traumatized from their …
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kavehintel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kaveh Intel 🇮🇷 | OSINT Analysis” (@kavehintel), 553 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kavehintel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.