Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᴏʜ ʏᴇss ᴍᴀsʜᴋᴀʀᴢᴢᴢ||ᴍsʜ

@kaul1tz81

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

277subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002383745364
TypeChannel
Username@kaul1tz81
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaul1tz81

Growth

276277276.512 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 276 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:46 — 276 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 05:34 — 277 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:3213 Aug 2026, 05:34
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:34277+1
12 Aug 2026, 22:46276no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:32276first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7431.2%
❤‍🔥5121.5%
💋3615.2%
custom 54634223143370357673414.3%
custom 5431854489395024223135.49%
custom 5438626192531936591125.06%
💘104.22%
🍾72.95%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kaul1tz81. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2025 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC71 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3custom 54386261925319365912

Signed

8 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💋 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 (10 шт в комм) 2003 - BILL A STAR SEARCH взял? пиши + или стик в комм 🌟поднять канал🌟 #msh #фотки #BillKaulitz

custom 543862619253193659152❤‍🔥2

Signed

3 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC107 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

какой год хотите?

  1. > 2003 малышарики69%
  2. 2005-200831%
  3. 2012-201538%
  4. 2020-е15%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed

1 Jul 2026, 04:21 UTC122 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💋 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 (88 шт в комм) VIVA COMET 2005 OBERHAUSEN, GERMANY 06.10.2005 взял? пиши + или стик в комм 🌟поднять канал🌟 #msh #фотки #TomKaulitz #BillKaulitz #GustavShefer #GeorgListing

❤‍🔥65custom 54386261925319365914

Signed

26 Jun 2026, 15:55 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💋 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 (4 шт в комм) HOLLYWOOD PHOTOSHOOT LA, USA 13.05.2008 взял? пиши + или стик в комм 🌟поднять канал🌟 #msh #фотки #TomKaulitz #BillKaulitz #GustavShefer #GeorgListing

💋1custom 54386261925319365911

Signed

25 Jun 2026, 04:43 UTC101 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

💋 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 (30 шт в комм) CAUGHT ON CAMERA DVD PHOTOSHOOT 2008 взял? пиши + или стик в комм 🌟поднять канал🌟 #msh #фотки #TomKaulitz #BillKaulitz #GustavShefer #GeorgListing

💋5❤‍🔥43🍾1💘1

Signed

22 Jun 2026, 17:34 UTC110 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

какой год хотите?

  1. > 2005 малышариков42%
  2. 2005 - 200732%
  3. 2008 - 201053%
  4. 2012 - 201721%
  5. 2020 - 202611%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed

22 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC107 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ну что, родные, все, я с вами 😜😜 завтра выставлю фотосет) в комм фотки в хорошем качестве

❤‍🔥5💋4

Signed

5 Nov 2025, 11:48 UTC425 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

как такой прекрасный канал можно забыть?

❤‍🔥9💋2

5 Nov 2025, 08:35 UTC419 viewsread 12 August 2026

поставьте на этот пост рк. интересно, сколько сможем собрать

Signed ᴍsʜ@

5 Nov 2025, 08:34 UTC428 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

йооу, тут что еще кто-то есть? кто-то помнит меня?? мне приятно 🙏🤗

custom 5463422314337035767167custom 54318544893950242237

Signed ᴍsʜ@

5 Nov 2025, 07:40 UTC397 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ну что, ребятки, сегодня год, как я создала этот тгк. изначально он был просто моим архивом, а потом меня любимая квоттис подтолкнула на ведение тгк. не смотря на то, что я закрыла этот канал, я считаю, что получила бесценный опыт. спасибо всем, кто меня помнит

custom 5463422314337035767186custom 54318544893950242236

Signed ᴍsʜ@

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kaul1tz81. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

какой год хотите?

  1. > 2003 малышарики69%
  2. 2005-200831%
  3. 2012-201538%
  4. 2020-е15%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jun 2026, 17:34 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

какой год хотите?

  1. > 2005 малышариков42%
  2. 2005 - 200732%
  3. 2008 - 201053%
  4. 2012 - 201721%
  5. 2020 - 202611%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,454,726 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴏʜ ʏᴇss ᴍᴀsʜᴋᴀʀᴢᴢᴢ||ᴍsʜ” (@kaul1tz81), 277 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaul1tz81.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.