Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for katychb

Channel

katychb

@katychb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

609subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002024406115
TypeChannel
Username@katychb
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katychb

Growth

609616612.57 August 2026 — 616 subscribers8 August 2026 — 616 subscribers16 August 2026 — 613 subscribers24 August 2026 — 609 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 608–617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 11:42609-4
16 Aug 2026, 04:58613-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:02616no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:11616first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 62109300447143553099378.8%
custom 54336830889011599082521.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2026, 17:34 UTC641 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

прошло 2 месяца занятий, которые я откладывала годами — ✨ english ✨ на самом деле самым сложным к тому, чтобы начать — было найти своего преподавателя! вот правда. дальше уже просто тянешься вереницей и не кажется все таким сложным и запутанным. мне нравится, что это стало моей рутиной, я стала сама заниматься изучением и в целом появились какие-то новые мини цели, планы. + мне нравится сам факт того, что я занима

custom 621093004471435530910

26 Mar 2026, 11:56 UTC576 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 62109300447143553097

26 Mar 2026, 11:55 UTC497 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

бежевая мамочка снова на связи

custom 62109300447143553093

24 Mar 2026, 14:27 UTC528 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

пытаюсь перестать быть бежевой мамочкой — фото1, но к сожалению мой вайб это фото6………. я даже не знаю плохо это или нет, но у меня так много схожих вещей в одинаковых цветах……. вроде и легко сочетать и всегда выгляжу хорошо, а вроде и однообразие такое…? я клянусь, у меня какая шопоголикомания начинается каждую весну, мне нужно буквально все (хотя у меня уже все есть) 😔

custom 621093004471435530917

23 Mar 2026, 14:16 UTC419 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+ и - иметь сестру: + бесплатный психолог + у нее нет варианта не послушать мои кружочки + шмотки х2 + платит за меня в кафешках - живет за 1800 км 😔 - иногда злится просто так

custom 621093004471435530915

21 Mar 2026, 10:54 UTC424 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

последний месяц практически не использовала никакие розовые/персиковые румяна, только терракотовые но заказала эту малышку и мне прям безумно понравилось! нежно, не ярко. это я еще сверху прошлась немного розовым хайлайтером диор. спасибо Сашулику за бьюти рекомендацию!!!

custom 62109300447143553098custom 54336830889011599087

18 Mar 2026, 21:16 UTC481 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

выбирая между айпадом и айфоном, сегодня я поняла, что стоило выбирать второй вариант 😆 но, кто ж знал. я в тот же день, когда писала пост — получила своего новенького пупсика, в голубом цвете, как я и хотела)🩵 я теперь жуткий айпад кид, поняла, что вообще теперь не хочу в телефоне сидеть, только на айпаде)) безумно удобно и монтировать, и заниматься английским стало в 100 раз удобнее, и тиктоки смотреть хаха. так

custom 621093004471435530920

18 Mar 2026, 13:25 UTC396 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я хочу лечь в лужу из своих слез и захлебнуться в ней…

custom 54336830889011599085

18 Mar 2026, 13:25 UTC386 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

угадайте настроение 🤲🏻

custom 543368308890115990813

16 Mar 2026, 08:02 UTC418 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ангелы проснулись 💫 допиваю последнюю пачку акнекутана и завершаю (снова) курс чистой головы и кожи хаха. буду скучать… а еще девочки, мне нужен ваш совет! у меня очень устают глаза от работы в телефоне + не хватает памяти, поэтому я хочу купить айпад. (макбук уже есть, но в нем как то не особо удобно мне монтировать) стоит ли…?? я переживаю, чтобы было также удобно монтировать ролики, как и на телефоне.

custom 621093004471435530913

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @katychb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 641,282 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

lettres d’elina
@lettreselina · 42,726
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“katychb” (@katychb), 609 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katychb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.