Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for к значит капуцин

Channel

к значит капуцин

@katya_capuchin_monkey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

322subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002894752359
TypeChannel
Username@katya_capuchin_monkey
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katya_capuchin_monkey

Growth

311322316.510 August 2026 — 311 subscribers10 August 2026 — 311 subscribers17 August 2026 — 322 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 309–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:07322+11
10 Aug 2026, 09:40311no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:02311first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.2%
avg views ÷ 322 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held9 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,164
Reactions total409
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

409 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17242.1%
❤‍🔥8621.0%
💘348.31%
🥰338.07%
💔307.33%
🕊215.13%
😢133.18%
💅112.69%
🍓61.47%
🙏30.733%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC33 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Страница 8 #комикс

❤‍🔥101

9 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC129 views47 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Про папу Скоро стукнет 6 лет, как не стало моего папы. Он был очень, очень сложным человеком и сделал много плохого. Но сейчас хочу рассказать, за что я ему благодарна. 1. Папа обладал уникальной, очень развитой чувствительностью. У него было хрупкое сердце. Он умел по-настоящему любить и ценить. Я рада, что он участвовал в моей жизни и всегда старался уделить мне время. Я благодарна за его присутствие. И благодарн

💔2911🕊6🍓1

8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC136 views51 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Страница 7 интересно, кто-то поймет отсылку…….. #комикс

❤‍🔥405💘5🍓1

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC145 views67 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

За ГОД ведения блога я ни разу не грубила в комментариях. Жалела, думала что так неправильно. Сейчас со всей ответственностью заявляю - правильно. Если копить весь негатив, который приносят дебилы в интернете, можно лопнуть. С днем посылания нахуй, друзья🥂

🥰3322🕊6💅5❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC142 views45 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Штуки #арт

❤‍🔥2713💅4🍓1

7 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC142 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я не очень люблю «Любовь, смерть и роботы», но мне нравится формат сборника с разными сюжетами. Несколько лет назад я случайно наткнулась на короткую анимацию Toujin Kit и влюбилась в нее. Оказалось, что это часть сборника Genius Party Beyond, где представлены короткометражки от разных режиссёров и художников. Это очень классный сборник 2008 года, также есть первая часть - Genius Party (2007). Я посмотрела оба сбор

💘1810🍓1

7 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC151 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026

С рпп я знакома лет с 15, и вот какие странные пищевые привычки и страхи у меня сформировались: 1. Я не буду есть неинтересную еду. Мне важно, чтобы было много разных текстур (мягкое, хрустящее, жидкое, твердое и т.п). Поэтому я не люблю большинство супов - мне просто скучно их есть. 2. Мне нравится, когда один прием пищи состоит из маленьких этапов. Либо одно цельное (и интересное!) блюдо, либо три маленьких «пере

26🕊9😢4🙏3💔1💘1

6 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC157 views64 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чуть больше года назад я взяла в руки цветные карандаши и начала рисовать. Около двух лет я находилась в глубоком артблоке и была уверена, что навсегда заброшу рисование. Но в один прекрасный день все поменялось. Люблю эти работы, в них очень много жизни. #арт

43💘10❤‍🔥8💅2🍓1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @katya_capuchin_monkey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,364,756 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“к значит капуцин” (@katya_capuchin_monkey), 322 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katya_capuchin_monkey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.