Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 62 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 01:38
64
+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:30
63
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:37
63
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5404348071427452791
15
35.7%
custom 5451632697828979628
15
35.7%
custom 5420315771991497307
4
9.52%
custom 5440658278998642346
4
9.52%
custom 5287744867596801868
2
4.76%
custom 5454014179885200592
2
4.76%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Part 2: про защиту и “приключение с ногой” 😱
Утро воскресенья, 14 июня. Просыпаюсь и понимаю, что тоже заболела 😴
В понедельник бегу в соседнюю цветочную базу — делаем букеты с мамой для приемной комиссии. На улице всё тот же дождь.
Дальше весь вечер мы с Аней пишем речь и заканчиваем презентацию, до ночи вносим правки. Снова ночевка.
Утром бежим за уже готовыми букетами на базу и выдвигаемся на защиту.
И тут сам…
Part 1: про хаос перед сдачей 👩🎓
Damn, давно меня тут не было!
Конец учебного года выдался странным — сил на свой мини блог/дневник вообще не было 🥲
Рассказываю о своих приключениях для тех, кто не видел сторис в инсте.
Мы с моей подругой-соавтором доделывали финальные штрихи: каждый день были на связи с руководителем, доводили до ума работу.
И вот — время печати.
🤨Печатаем, отдаем 3500₽ и обе в шоке.
Дальше уст…
Я вовсю готовлюсь к диплому! *bruh*
Поэтому вот вам пару видео с поездки в приют и мой небольшой вело-трип по местам детства 🤭
P.S. - I’m my own huge fan when it comes to short videos 😍🤨✌
Пришли мои сертификаты за участие в конференциях🤓
Повторюсь, скажи мне раньше, что я на добровольной основе буду участвовать в подобного рода мероприятиях, не поверила бы 🤨
🌼мама до сих пор не верит
А ещё сегодня старт курса по преподаванию грамматики, надо будет успеть выполнить домашку ‼️‼️
📌Как образование меняется прямо сейчас — взгляд изнутри
В субботу присоединилась к онлайн конференции «Перезагрузка образовательного опыта — 2026» от МПГУ — and that was spot on‼️
Дальше пост в картинках ⬇️⬇️⬇️
______________________
А вы как относитесь к ИИ в обучении:
это больше помощник или всё-таки риск❓
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @katherine_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Katherine_eng” (@katherine_eng), 64 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katherine_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
