Channel
@katerine_official1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
123subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002772280587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katerine_official1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 19 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katerine_official1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 123 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 121 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 121 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
53 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 41.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 15.1% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну что, друзья, глаз у вас хорошо намётан:) Первые 3 видео это мои попытки в 18+ ИИ для Онлифанс-агентства — мы делали нейро-моделей и пытались их продвинуть в инстаграме. Хайпа особого не случилось, видосы не взлетали, подписчики не шли. Вторые иишки — это уже делает для меня агентство, с которым я сотрудничаю. Работают с ними на специальном сайте Fanvue — я писала о нем на своем канале для секс-воркеров. Буду кст…
❤2
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Немного горяченького вам на ночь 🔥 Угадайте, где ИИ-модель, а где настоящая девушка Завтра дам правильный ответ 🌚
В работе с PubgMobile повысила свои навыки в ИИ: теперь умею добавлять предметы в снятое видео 👉 #портфолио
❤2👍2
Блогер из меня такой себе, но вот вам итоги по просмотрам моих иишек
❤3🔥2
И такие клиенты теперь в моем #портфолио! Делала AI-вставки для рилсов соцсетей Pubg Mobile. С нейросетями возможно все: и скатывание в сугробе с горы, и оживление пингвинчиков ☺️
👍2
Ставьте лайк, у кого сейчас типичный конец гАда 😁
🤣2😁1
Сделали клип Артему частично с использованием AI 😌
Yan Halo - Анк Клип созданный @vikarimrim через нейросеть отражает время трендов 2к25 Только я со скейтом реален😁
❤3
#портфолио Вот такое шикарное рекламное видео для нового ресторана в Челябинске. Помогла с генерацией сцен, цветокоррекция и монтаж — @iamdariaevgenievna
❤3👍2👎2🔥2
Всем привет! Я возобновляю работу с AI и в этом посте прикреплю свои работы и расценки 😎 Оживление картинки/персонажа/генерация видео (без звука) по вашему запросу — 2000 рублей/запрос. Видео до 8 секунд. В эту стоимость входит 3 правки со стороны заказчика. Более длинные видео/со звуком от 5000 рублей. Генерация картинок/фотосессий с вашим участием — 1000 рублей/5 штук. Пишите в личные сообщения, обсудим вашу идею…
🔥5🤣4❤2❤🔥2👍2🥰2👎1
Катя — всё. На связи создательница Кати и сегодня я хочу сказать, что временно (а может и навсегда) приостанавливаю этот проект. Как бы это ни было грустно, я потеряла вдохновение продолжать эту историю — как вы могли заметить за месяц я выпустила всего одну серию, а все это время мой аккаунт с Veo лежал без дела, поэтому завтра я не планирую его продлевать. С Катей вышел прикольный эксперимент. Про нас написало С…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @katerine_official1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 11 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI RIM” (@katerine_official1), 123 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katerine_official1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.