Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Меню мультоеда

Channel

Меню мультоеда

@katerinapromult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119338492
TypeChannel
Username@katerinapromult
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/katerinapromult

Growth

122125123.531 August 2026 — 122 subscribers31 August 2026 — 122 subscribers10 September 2026 — 124 subscribers17 September 2026 — 125 subscribers31 August 202617 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:01125+1
10 Sept 2026, 00:36124+2
31 Aug 2026, 20:08122no change
31 Aug 2026, 16:30122first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 125 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
24.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 March 202631 August 2026)
Views total29
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5040.7%
👍2822.8%
1814.6%
❤‍🔥108.13%
😁54.07%
💯32.44%
21.63%
🔥21.63%
🤨21.63%
👌10.813%
🤷10.813%
🥰10.813%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
112
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
93.0
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Ranymg5HpF111 June 202611 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC29 views7 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Топ лучших российских мультов "Афиша" опросила 37 мультоведов: какие самые лучшие мультфильмы есть в России. Рассказала всё как на духу, ничего не скрывала. Ищите меня под номером 10, хвалю “Федота-стрельца”. Ну и про другие мультфильмы читайте, их там аж 21 штука.

👍7

Signed Katerina Grishina

11 Jun 2026, 07:17 UTC112 views13 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Ranymg5HpFForwarded from @okkomoviesPhoto

Чем вдохновляются творцы? Классикой! Отмечаем 90-летие «СОЮЗМУЛЬТФИЛЬМА» 🎉🎉🎉 Смотрите в Okko прямо сейчас

6😁5❤‍🔥2

Signed Katerina Grishina

1 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC125 views14 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Интересный квест подкинули Карен из «Караван идет» и Нина из «KINO_NINA» — собрать десять фильмов, которые пытаются взглянуть на мир глазами ребенка. Мой ответ: Мой сосед Тоторо Тайна Келлс Коралина в Стране кошмаров Эрнест и Селестина Волшебный лес Жизнь Кабачка (18+) Цыпленок для Линды! Кот-призрак Андзу (12+) Орион и Тьма Маленькая Амели Здесь свои законы времени и пространства, возможного и невозможного. Но пер

👍833

Signed Katerina Grishina

1 Jun 2026, 08:12 UTC84 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Премьеры июня 2026 Что посмотреть в кино и интернетах ▫️История игрушек 5 (США) – 17 июня. Вуди и Базз спасают ребенка от планшета :)) Когда появится в неофициальном прокате, не знаю, но, видимо, где-то в июне-июле. Следите за расписанием вашего любимого кинотеатра. Трейлер ▫️Хранитель камфорного дерева (Япония, 18+) – 18 июня. Чтобы избежать тюремного срока, парень принимает предложение о необычной работе. Будет в

61👍1

Signed Katerina Grishina

13 May 2026, 16:43 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Вот смотрю я на трейлер "Дикого леса" и удивляюсь: анимация настолько плавная и детализированная, что от 3Д не слишком отличается. Из предыдущих видео я поняла, что студия Laika очень старается прыгнуть выше возможностей кукольного стоп-моушена. Но надо ли? Непонятно. Выглядит роскошно. Очень хочу посмотреть. И при этом ролик оставляет ощущение, что фильм провалится в прокате. Не та история

❤‍🔥63👍1💯1

Signed Katerina Grishina

7 May 2026, 11:51 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Рассказала вот тут про фильм «Несси. Чудище из Лохх-Несс». На IMDb у него, на мой взгляд, совершенно несправедливая оценка 6.7. Скорее всего, потому, что голосовали норвежские зрители, которые выросли на книжках про "Руффена. Морского змея, который не умел плавать". Когда режиссеры берутся за священную классику, угодить почти невозможно. Читала отзывы норвежских зрителей и не находила тех недостатков, в которых они о

5👌1

Signed Katerina Grishina

5 May 2026, 06:55 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Премьеры мая Что будем смотреть в кино и интернетах Отвлеклась на отпуск и без зазрения совести отложила этот пост на потом. А май оказался богатым на любопытные премьеры. ▫️Скотный двор – 1 мая (PG*). Экранизация соответствующей повести Джорджа Оруэлла. Режиссером стал Энди Серкис: он известен как Голлум из “Властелина колец” и Цезарь из “Планеты обезьян”, то есть главный CGI-актер в мире. Играл ли он кого-нибудь

🔥211👍1🤷1

Signed Katerina Grishina

25 Apr 2026, 07:52 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Главный кайф фильма “Потеряшки и тайна волшебной пирамиды” — в том, как он сделан. О содержании рассказывала выше. За бросовым, ничего не обещающим названием скрывается анимационный фильм в смешанной технике: комбинация реальных съемок и CGI. То есть персонажей анимировали в 3Д, а окружение снимали на улицах Рима. Такой подход позволил режиссерам Франческо Дафано и Луке Делла Гротта играть с объемами, глубиной прост

5👍3

Signed Katerina Grishina

22 Apr 2026, 08:09 UTC83 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Внезапно: у итальянцев есть мультфильм “Мусор”. В России он вышел в марте 2022 года под компромиссным названием “Потеряшки и Тайна волшебной пирамиды”. Это история о том, как мусор ищет второй шанс, по пути постигая основы человечности и взаимовыручки. Он более мрачный и страшненький, чем “На выброс” (2025) Константина Бронзита, но мотивы всё те же — желание снова обрести полезность и новое предназначение. Встречают

7🤨2❤‍🔥1👍1

Signed Katerina Grishina

18 Apr 2026, 06:40 UTC93 views7 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Неискренняя утопия в “Арко” В далеком-далеком будущем, где-то в конце тысячелетия, живет мальчик Арко. Его назвали не в честь крема для бритья, а сокращенно от Arcoiris (Радуга). Мальчики в будущем такие же раздолбаи, как и сейчас, только на более продвинутом уровне. Поэтому, сбежав однажды из дома, он оказывается в прошлом. Но не в наши дни, а в нашем ближайшем будущем, где всё как обычно плохо: небеса разверзаются

4👍2❤‍🔥1

Signed Katerina Grishina

9 Apr 2026, 07:24 UTC99 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Бобры не то, чем кажутся Всё продолжаю размышлять о “Прыгунах”. Конечно, вопросы экологичных отношений человека и природы — это прекрасно, но в фильме разговор вышел крайне поверхностным. А ведь в самом образе жизни бобров лежит интереснейшая возможность. Эти животные так же, как и человек, кардинально меняют среду под себя. Вы можете однажды прийти в любимый лес и не узнать его, потому что в местной речке поселилс

5👍4💯2

Signed Katerina Grishina

1 Apr 2026, 07:09 UTC116 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Хохотальный список Два года назад набросала для себя экстренный список мультфильмов, которые можно смотреть, если нужен срочный и проверенный позитивчик. Есть у тебя, например, дурное настроение и пара часов для терапии — вот они, выбирай. С тех пор мой список прирос новыми историями, так что обновила. Фильмы и сериалы: ▫️Алеша Попович и Тугарин змей ▫️+Астерикс и Обеликс: Поединок вождей ▫️+Дикий робот ▫️Добрыня Н

721🥰1

Signed Katerina Grishina

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @katerinapromult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Меню мультоеда” (@katerinapromult), 125 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katerinapromult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.