Channel
@katerina_romm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
314subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001684364671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katerina_romm |
| Description | Катерина Ромм, автор «Флориендейла» (издательство «Полынь») — о книгах, творчестве и жизни в эмиграции 🏔🐈 Посты раз в три недели — это норма, не теряйте 👌🏻 Для связи: @lemeryks |
| Created | 23 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katerina_romm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 314 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 314 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (2 April 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97 |
| Reactions total | 57 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
265 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5465370249509492835 | 41 | 15.5% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 9.81% | |
| custom 5465289117577267317 | 18 | 6.79% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 6.42% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 2.64% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Последние недели пребывала в лимбе, в совершенно подвешенном состоянии, не могла ничего толком написать, даже торты уже не хотела печь... А почему — вот вам ответ 😄❤️ Ох как мы ждали рождения нашей девочки Марианы, сестрички для малыша Ю. (Ю. заказывал именно сестричку ☝🏻)! Столько было мучительных вопросов: ну когда же уже, когда-а-а? Дождались под занавес 30 июля! Это было быстро, это было больно, это было эффект…
❤29😍17🥰7🔥4
📍Сан Марино 🇸🇲 Открыли новую страну! Да ещё какую огромную. Сан-Марино претендует на звание старейшего суверенного государства в мире ☝️🏻 Правда, понять, где заканчивается Италия и начинается старейшее суверенное государство, непросто. Мы немного заблудились на границе (это мы хорошо умеем), несколько раз произвольно въезжали и выезжали... Хоть бы флаги поставили 😅 Гуляли по столице. Жить там, конечно, невозможно —…
❤18🔥6custom 54653702495094928353
Мы впервые выбрались в "семейный отель". И вот на третий день во мне воскресла способность складывать буквы в слова, ура. Всё-таки хорошо, когда четыре раза в день кормят, убирают вместо тебя за твоим тоддлером да и вообще всячески заботятся 🥰 Хорошо, когда есть море, бассейн с водой, бассейн с шариками, батуты, картинг и ещё всякое разное. Жаль только, что дорога заняла 10 часов 🫣 Вот я прям не уверена, что захочу …
🔥13❤6custom 54653702495094928354
А еще, а еще! Сегодня день рождения у Катерины Ромм! Она подарила нам вселенную «Флориендейл», где у нас вышли два романа «Одна из них» и «По краю земли»! Поздравляем! И напоминаем, что сегодня финальный день скидок и оба романа вы можете купить со скидкой в 30%!!! Заходите на сайт и поздравляйте автора заказом книжек 💕💕
❤15custom 54653702495094928359custom 54652891175772673174🔥1
У меня скоро день рождения, а вчера был день рождения моего выпускающего редактора Лины, так что... чем не повод купить один или два Флориендейла, ещё и под такие скидки? ☝️🏻❤️ А если Фло у вас уже есть, то на сайте Полыни в принципе есть из чего выбрать ☺️ ☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️
custom 54653702495094928358❤6🔥2custom 54652891175772673172
ТАКОГО ЕЩЕ НЕ БЫЛО… Майские праздники – отличный повод впрок запастись хорошей литературой, поэтому мы решили, что скидки до 40% будут очень кстати! Итак, с 1 по 7 мая заходите на сайт polynbooks.ru и заказывайте новинки, бестселлеры, предзаказы по приятнейшим ценам! Пересылайте друзьям, чтобы они не упустили такой шанс 🙂↔️
🔥4
Давно не читали совместно первый Флориендейл, а вот оно!! 🏰❤️🧤
custom 54652891175772673175custom 54653702495094928354🔥2
🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺 Совместные чтения с автором Екатериной Ромм 🏰 Наши встречи проходят в клубе "Калейдоскоп историй" Стучись-откроем: https://t.me/+Y__Q8mRjZ5IyMTli Вас ждут: 🔹 Общение с автором 🔹Дополнительный материал по книге 🔹Ежедневные обсуждения прочитанных страниц 🔹Удобные пороги 🔹Активные участники и горячие обсуждения 🔹Комфорт и уютная атмосфера в читательском клубе Старт чтений: 16 апреля Кол-во страниц: 400 …
❤10custom 54653702495094928358custom 54652891175772673174
Возможно, ничего милее этого я сегодня уже не увижу 🥰 Друзья, если вы любите мое творчество, пожалуйста, не проходите мимо моей главной книги — "Заглянувший". Знаю, что их осталось около 800 штук, а допечатка не планируется.
❤14🔥6custom 54652891175772673173
Ю. утащил книжку, которую сейчас читаю, и сосредоточенно листал её минут 15, пока я готовила пасхальные куличи👇🏻 18+, между прочим. Вот это я безответственная мать 😄
😁15🔥5
Апрель заглядывает в моё окно и пытается понять, почему он выглядит так же, как февраль 🤔 #Альпы
❤15😁11custom 54653702495094928355
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @katerina_romm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,215,734 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@katerina_romm named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катерина в Альпах ۞ Флориендейл” (@katerina_romm), 314 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katerina_romm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.