Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 02:59
271
-19
8 Sept 2026, 13:18
290
-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:37
291
+4
22 Aug 2026, 03:27
287
+5
15 Aug 2026, 17:22
282
+14
8 Aug 2026, 08:50
268
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:35
268
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:14
267
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
743 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 4909153572152673043
183
24.6%
custom 5201750160517898706
176
23.7%
custom 5451808525200140520
119
16.0%
custom 5379997844537090440
104
14.0%
custom 5328171247270372640
85
11.4%
custom 5327974481933640874
55
7.40%
custom 4906693097057944346
21
2.83%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 743 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда полезно
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
и посмотреть назад.
Недавно открыла свои старые посты.
Полистала.
Минуты через две поймала себя на мысли:
— Кать... Ты угораешь?..😂
Такое ощущение, что раньше хороший пост выглядел примерно так:
«Купи.
Купи.
Ну купииии.»
И я ведь тогда реально думала, что это охренеть какой маркетинг. 🤣
Потом решила посмотреть уже НЕ на старые посты.
А на ТО, что вообще произошло со мной за после…
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А тебе вообще говорили, что можно скупить хоть двадцать курсов…
И при этом не заработать ни рубля? 😄
Потому что многие кураторы готовы полчаса рассказывать, какой курс сейчас самый-самый.
Но почему-то забывают задать один вопрос.
— А тебе вообще что нравится?
Мне кажется, вот с этого всё и начинается.
Ну вот правда… какой смысл идти туда, где уже через пару дней хочется выкинуть телефон в окно вместе со всеми ч…
Вообще-то я могла уже давно
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
( зарабатывать)
Но вместо этого специально усложнила себе жизнь, чтобы потом не усложнять её другим.
Я уже столько раз наблюдала одну и ту же картину. 🍀
Человек покупает очередное обучение.
Открывает.
Первый урок.
Второй.
Третий...
И где-то на десятом ловит себя на мысли:
— Так... А зарабатывать-то когда?
Или сначала кандидатскую защитить?
😂
Каждый раз о…
А это как раз те самые фотографии и видео. 😊
Тогда я снимала их просто потому, что мне это нравилось. Даже не подозревая, что именно они однажды заставят меня задуматься о возвращении в онлайн.
Оказалось, что от себя вообще хрен 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🥺
Прикол в том, что я уже однажды всё бросила...
И самое смешное...
Вернуться обратно мне помогла обычная ПИЦЦА.
Нет, я сейчас
не прикалываюсь 😂
Если честно, сама бы никогда не поверила, что всё закончится именно так.
Но чтобы вы поняли, почему обычные фотоотчёты в итоге вернули меня обратно, придётся немного вернуться назад...
Пять лет онлайн были для меня не просто …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @katerina_krasina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина | Онлайн без сказок” (@katerina_krasina), 271 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katerina_krasina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
