Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

кейт пикс

@katepeaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

290subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002668853874
TypeChannel
Username@katepeaks
Descriptionпарфюмерные заметки через призму мировой культуры: кино, литература, музыка. подберу идеальный визуальный образ к аромату - от героев Достоевского до героинь Линча 🖤 на связи: @katepeaks
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/katepeaks

Growth

2907 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 290 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:17 — 290 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:188 Aug 2026, 08:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 289–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:17290no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:18290first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.9%
avg views ÷ 290 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
1 post measured
Reaction rate
39.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held11 (25 May 202624 July 2026)
Views total107
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
620
Videos
24
Links
133

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

458 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532113437714759753918039.3%
custom 531215438221570781713629.7%
custom 545611271808590624710322.5%
custom 5985425024515840797398.52%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 11 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katepeaks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC107 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

d’Annam - Bubble Tea Бренд решил не останавливаться на напиточной теме, и после Вьетнамского кофе попал прямо в мою болевую точку: обожаю Боба чай! Ноты легко можно угадать и самому: чай, молоко, сахар, шарики тапиоки. Интересно, каким окажется аромат. Я не люблю лактонность, но очень люблю чайность, а теплый запах вареной крахмальной тапиоки - это вообще что-то очень уютное и родное. В ожидании нового релиза вер

custom 532113437714759753927custom 54561127180859062478custom 59854250245158407977

5 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,140 views41 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Миры и аллегории. Побывали на поистине уникальном мероприятии: изучили все вышедшие на данный момент ароматы итальянского парфюмера Джузеппе Импреццабиле - Meo Fusciuni. Маргарита проделала грандиозную работу - лекция была и ретроспективная, и биографическая, и аналитическая: даже были сделаны прогнозы на будущее бренда. Интересно, совпадет ли предсказание)) У бренда я давно знаю Buio, Little Song и Varanasi - тем

custom 532113437714759753922custom 531215438221570781713custom 59854250245158407976

26 Jun 2026, 09:45 UTC218 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @parfizbushkaPhoto

Настроение пахнуть примерно как-то так:

custom 531215438221570781719custom 545611271808590624718custom 53211343771475975399

23 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC246 views35 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hermetica - Ivyme Полнотелый и упругий зеленый плющ вьется по стене. Напоминает запах свежескошенной травы. Горьковатый и сочный, он отрезвляет и тонизирует. Или это все аромат гальбанума, а плющ только привлекает внимание? Через несколько часов бодрого благоухания в игру вступает цветок розы. Привычный символ любви, красоты, женственности, всего хорошего против всего плохого, здесь роза пытается доминировать над з

custom 531215438221570781717custom 532113437714759753913custom 59854250245158407975

18 Jun 2026, 05:49 UTC231 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kenzo - Flower by Kenzo L'Absolue 3 флакон бренда в нашей коллекции - и снова случайность, выдали в подарок вместе со слоником. Как видите по бутылочке, разнашивать пытаюсь, но сколько не ношу, ощущения невнятные. Это и не стопроцентно цветочная история, и не уход в пряно-ванильный профиль, в моих глазах аромат штормит от шафрана на ванильной подложке до цветочных мускусов. Этот шторм придушивает и подслащает, пов

custom 531215438221570781716custom 53211343771475975399custom 54561127180859062471

16 Jun 2026, 14:57 UTC188 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kenzo - Jungle L'Elephant Захотелось показать вам еще один флакончик Кензо из моей коллекции, ну и мистера Тимбо давно не было! Пряный, согревающий сердце аромат, полюбился мне с первого раза, а потом и флакон подвернулся по приятной цене. Громче всего слышу гвоздику, кардамон, пачули, ваниль, тмин. Каждый день носить не хочется, потому что аромат яркий и характерный, могу от него устать в какой-то момент. Но, ко

custom 545611271808590624726custom 532113437714759753910custom 53121543822157078176

9 Jun 2026, 05:25 UTC244 views53 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kenzo - L'Eau Kenzo Pour Femme Цветочная акватика: лотос, мята, персик. Иногда чудится огуречная детокс-вода со льдом. (А кому-то даже корюшка) Один из немногих акватиков конца 90-х, который мне нравится. Вообще вся эта линейка занимает особое место в сердце, потому что в 2000-е папа очень любил дарить маме на праздники именно Кензо. Мне нравится его чувствовать на себе - ненавязчиво, но устойчиво слышу аромат нес

custom 532113437714759753932custom 545611271808590624713custom 59854250245158407978

2 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC298 views41 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«вот это да» - подумала я, когда забирала посылку Mari’s Scented Box от канала Mari’s Obsession. в огромной коробке в итоге оказалось почти 170 ароматов, каких-то не было на фраге, а некоторые были целыми флаконами! как же я кайфанула за эту неделю))) отдельное удовольствие - наконец вычеркивать ароматы из списка для затеста… пост о главной находке коробки уже есть выше ⬆️ а сейчас поделюсь списком фаворитов: Me

custom 531215438221570781723custom 53211343771475975399custom 59854250245158407977custom 54561127180859062472

28 May 2026, 15:34 UTC271 views38 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Houbigant - La Belle Saison хрустящая, чистая, праздничная цветочность. цветы тут желтые и белые, такой красивый и яркий весенне-летний букет с медом и пыльцой. в базе лабданум, сандал, мускус. люблю ароматы, которые поднимают настроение, а этот прямо-таки оптимизм во флаконе! визуал: Лив Тайлер #парфюмерное@katepeaks

custom 531215438221570781723custom 532113437714759753912custom 54561127180859062473

25 May 2026, 11:47 UTC291 views62 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

пока я тихонько брожу между флаконов с мистером Тимбо в обнимку, не в силах что-то разнюхивать и обозревать, моя коробочка уже приехала в первый город по маршруту. так рада читать первые и такие лестные отзывы 🥰

custom 545611271808590624732custom 532113437714759753920custom 531215438221570781710

25 May 2026, 11:44 UTC269 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @parfmemesPhoto

Что-то меняется, но круговорот бродилок неизмемен... А это значит, что ко мне приехала бродилка 'Изучаем' от канала Кейт пикс! Это не просто ароматы - это концепции, вдохновленные музыкальными жанрами и композициями, сериалами, писателями и событиями. Оформление посылки чудесное - посмотрите на этот маленький фотоальбом с коллажами посвященными каждому аромату! Первый аромат посвящен впечатлениям от ночной техно-в

custom 532113437714759753917custom 53121543822157078179custom 59854250245158407976

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @katepeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,198 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кейт пикс” (@katepeaks), 290 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katepeaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.