Channel
@kateeducate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
848subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001977839334 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kateeducate |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kateeducate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:10 | 848 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 848 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
185 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 44.9% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 17.8% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 14.6% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 9.19% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.78% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.24% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.24% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.62% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.541% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Well, hello! 👋 Представим страшную ситуацию: вы переехали в другую страну или начали работать с иностранными коллегами - и в какой-то момент говорите "Okay guys!" на деловой встрече или пишете в имейле "he" про абстрактного клиента и сразу чувствуете: что-то не так. Никто не поправил, но пауза была… а почему? В чём проблема? Дело в том, что английский меняется быстрее, чем нам кажется, и то, что было стандартом 20 …
❤7🔥2
Ещё хотела поделиться фоткой долгопята, которого мне посчастливилось увидеть на Филиппинах 🐈 По-английски он называется tarsier, и это самое милое, что вы увидите за сегодня!
❤15🥰3🔥2
Hey! Ситуация: вам очень понравилось блюдо в кафе за границей и вы спрашиваете “Can I have the receipt for this dish?" - а официант приносит вам чек вместо рецепта. Вы в замешательстве, он в замешательстве 😄 Как вы могли догадаться, сегодня мы разберем ложные друзья переводчика - слова, которые похожи на русские, но значат совсем другое. Коварная штука, потому что ошибка незаметна - вы уверены, что всё сказали прави…
❤6🥰3
Howdy! Зарисовка из жизни (признайтесь, было? 😅) Смотрите Друзей, а там Росс такой - "Rachel, you need to get over it!" И вы такие: get over что? Над чем перелезть? Потом открываете рабочий чат, а там коллега пишет "I'll get back to you on this" - и непонятно, это он ответит или вежливо слился. Если вы сейчас в замешательстве от этих фраз, скорее всего, дело в фразовых глаголах 🐈 Что такое фразовые глаголы вообще?…
❤5🔥1🥰1
Hey there! 🌸 Знакомая ситуация: вас спрашивают что-то на английском, вы всё поняли, но мозг завис на секунду - и в этой тишине вы почему-то говорите "Yes" или вообще молчите как рыба 🐟 А потом ещё и корите себя: "Ну почему я не сказал(а) нормально?!" Без паники! На самом деле носители тоже могут так зависнуть (вспомните себя на русском), только они не молчат и не сходят с ума от стыда, а используют фразы-мостики, к…
❤5🥰1
Good morning ☀️ Вопрос к всем, кто смотрел Гарри Поттера! Помните iconic сцену, где Гермиона поправляет Рона? "It's LeviOsa, not LevioSA" Рон в ответ смеётся, а Гермиона закатывает глаза. Я же думаю - она права не только про заклинание 🪄 В английском ударение - это не просто вопрос "красивого произношения" или британского/американского/подставить нужное акцента, а буквально часть грамматики! О чём я? Есть целая ка…
❤6👍2❤🔥1💘1
А ещё хочу запоздало поделиться поздравлением одного из моих учеников на 8 Марта 🐱 It warmed my heart! ———————————————— A friendly reminder: в боте @KateEducateEnglish_bot можно проверить свой уровень языка и записаться на диагностику своего уровня, если тоже хотите научиться писать такие теплые поздравления;) и общаться на английском в принципе, как в повседневной жизни, так и в путешествиях. Для связи напрямую @kat…
❤3💘3
Howdy! I hope this message finds you well:) Со времени последнего поста я много успела сделать 🐱 На момент последнего поста я была во Вьетнаме, в Дананге, где мне очень понравилось, даже думаю вернуться туда на более длительный период - классный климат, никаких проблем (почти) с языком, по крайней мере, по сравнению с Китаем, из которого мы туда приехали, единственная проблема - рынок жилья резко поменялся аккурат п…
🔥5🥰2❤1
Hey:) Сегодня хочу поделиться историей моего ученика Александра, мы с ним занимаемся General English - улучшаем общий уровень, чтобы комфортно чувствовать себя за границей в путешествиях и в жизни в целом. Изначально Александр пришел с уровнем А1+, и несмотря на то, что наверное это было не самым легким заданием, на диагностике он ни разу не перешёл на русский:) Прямо как и на наших последующих занятиях. Мы взяли про…
❤7🔥5👏3💘1
Кстати, у меня сегодня день рождения - мне исполнилось 30 лет! Встретила я новый виток жизни в Дананге (Вьетнам); раньше мне казалось, что это ого-го какой возраст, сейчас мне абсолютно спокойно, тридцать и тридцать 🐱 Как говорится, age is just a number:) В общем, Happy Birthday to me!
🥰21💘10💯7👍4🍾1🦄1
I was wondering if ___ any updates.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you happen to know why ___ so upset yesterday?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kateeducate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
I was wondering if ___ any updates.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you happen to know why ___ so upset yesterday?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Could you tell me where ___?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you know if ___ finished the report?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 29 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 543,281 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kate Educate | Английский, IELTS с Кейт” (@kateeducate), 848 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kateeducate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.