Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KATARINA KANO

Channel

KATARINA KANO

@katarinakanoart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

193subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541450490
TypeChannel
Username@katarinakanoart
Description🩸 http://katarinakano.com 🩸 media artist | animation and sculpture 🩸 contact: @katarinakano
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/katarinakanoart

Growth

1937 Aug 2026, 05:32 — 193 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:02 — 193 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:327 Aug 2026, 06:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:02193no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:32193first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
582
Videos
129
Links
99

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53641411388128743085667.5%
custom 53616441650860663371518.1%
💔89.64%
🌚44.82%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC78 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Начало серии «Капсула для птенца» Голуби реют серебряные, растерянные, вечерние… [...] Над тобой, мой жалобный Вороненок. Иссиня-черное, исчерна — Синее твое оперение. Жесткая, жадная, жаркая Масть. (М. Цветаева)

custom 536414113881287430811💔4

Signed Katarina Kano

10 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC655 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Про видеоарт как кино и кино как видеоарт... Я не люблю реализм. Честно. Бытовой достоверности, с его уродством, в избытке каждую секунду. Я, конечно, утрирую... и вся восточная философия не одобрит моего «непоиска красоты в повседневном», но ничего не могу с собой поделать. Визуальная поэзия — вот плоскость (экрана) моего интереса. Хочу поделиться эскапической подборкой авторов видеоарта и режиссеров кино, которые

custom 53641411388128743088💔4custom 53616441650860663372

Signed Katarina Kano

3 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC91 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @phygitalgalleryVideo

Рубрика: #отвечаем На вопросы об искусстве ⚡ Почему мы привыкли считать, что видеоарт — это исключительно видео на экране? Действительно ли формат определяет жанр? Что общего у залитых бетоном телевизоров и классических проекций? И как коммерческий рынок заставил нас верить в заблуждение, которое длится до сих пор? Отвечаем на вопросы в видео! Список упоминаний в видео: Becoming Light, Билл Виола, 2005 INVERSO MU

custom 536414113881287430812🌚3custom 53616441650860663372

Signed Katarina Kano

26 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC101 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @phygitalgalleryVideo

#отвечаем Рубрика: Искусство и вопросы. Разбираемся в разнице между акцией и акционистским искусством. Где проходит граница между политическим жестом и художественным высказыванием? Существует мнение, что акционизм — это лишь форма протеста, не имеющая отношения к прекрасному. Но так ли это на самом деле? Разбираемся в нюансах. Список упоминаний в видео: 1. Фотодокументация майских событий во Франции 1968 года —

custom 536164416508606633710custom 53641411388128743087🌚1

Signed Katarina Kano

23 Jun 2026, 19:54 UTC86 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«...Так жалом тронутая кровь Жалуется — без ядов! Так вбаливаются в любовь: Впадываются в падать». М. Цветаева (1923)

custom 53641411388128743088

Signed Katarina Kano

22 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC92 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tech_besPhoto

by DAMN TRUE

custom 536414113881287430810custom 53616441650860663371

Signed Katarina Kano

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @katarinakanoart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,189,666 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KATARINA KANO” (@katarinakanoart), 193 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katarinakanoart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.