Channel
@kashtanovi_priton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002455708479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kashtanovi_priton |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kashtanovi_priton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 88 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 89 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 89 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
244 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 27.9% | |
| 🍓 | 46 | 18.9% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 14.8% | |
| 💘 | 25 | 10.2% | |
| 🙏 | 22 | 9.02% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 4.92% | |
| 👻 | 10 | 4.10% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 4.10% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.82% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.82% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kashtanovi_priton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#творчество тестил новую прогу для рисования,спасибо подруне,что помогли мне разобраться как и что делать... А ЕЩЁ как видите,этот арт вообще не доделан,в последнее время все больше руки опускаются и я тупо не заканчиваю то что начал,может вообще рест взять,но с другой стороны у меня есть идеи и вдохновение....тяжело
❤10💘5🔥2🍓1🕊1🙏1
‼️ребят, прошу обратить ваше внимание‼️ это МОШЕННИК, ни в коем случае не связывайтесь с этим чуваком, он ходит абсолютно ПО ВСЕМ, даже по тем у кого аудитория очень маленькая, прошу быть осторожными и не связываться с такими людьми‼️ + это могут быть не только Евгении, а также и другие спам боты‼️ можете сделать на всякий случай репост, т.к не все могут всё ещё о нём знать ходят слухи о Женьке, где-то сел он на …
❤4
даже до меня эти Евгении добрались,изыди #щп бригада:под комментариями художников часто появляется некий Евгений,с заявлением о том,что вот ему понравился ваш стиль и он хочет видеть вас в его каком-то там бизнесе(?) НИ ЗА ЧТО не соглашайтесь,это массовая рассылка,я вижу его буквально везде??
🔥2
#творчество сразу закину и сюда каких чудиков с смпшника нарисовал!!
🍓10❤6🔥4💘3
#творчество мне кажется я не закончу эту чухню,опять какая-то ненависть к своим работам началась,поэтому закину так о боже
🔥5💘4❤3🍓2
#творчество я перестаю находить время для рисования это какой-то капец. к сожалению то что в спойлере пока не смогу закончить,поэтому ловите из моих запасов. да я рисую по принципу "если нечего рисовать — рисуй своего персонажа Вилба" 🌟
❤8🔥4🍓3👻1👾1💋1🙏1
#творчество вкину небольшой спойлер на арт ибо что-то опять ниче не выкладываю фуу как вдуть роботу кошка просит
❤11😍9👻5🍓2🔥2
#творчество ещё одно няшечко вкусняшечко из сонарии.тоже сильно хочу его,но он явно не стоит 40к-30к грибов сколько обычно ставят😱😱😱
🍓11💘5🔥4🙏3🎉1🕊1
#творчество так называемая практика на рисование лиц путём рисования нпс с одного смп проекта,кстати на него набор :D @apostrophesmp реклама бесплатно к сожалению мне не платили
💘8🍓4🙏4❤1❤🔥1🔥1
#творчество пытался научится делать рендер иным способом и поигрался с цветами.....вроде бы не так плохо
🙏6❤🔥3🍓3
будет вкид сегодня КЛЯНУСЬ постараюсь нарыть побольше чего нибудь
бля столько дел я разрываюсь даже забываю постить ой бляя #щп
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kashtanovi_priton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WilbXD(!) каштановый притон🫀🌌” (@kashtanovi_priton), 88 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashtanovi_priton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.