4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 18:16
55
-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:48
58
-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:01
59
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:16
59
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
35.7%
👏
8
28.6%
👍
6
21.4%
⚡
2
7.14%
🎉
1
3.57%
🥰
1
3.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 8 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kashfiyot_sari. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чет элдан автомобиль олиб кирмоқчимисиз?
Бу борада энг кўп учрайдиган саволларга Божхона қўмитаси Раисининг матбуот котиби Ҳусан ака Тангриев фойдали видео тайёрлаптилар.
Видеода қуйидаги саволларга аниқ жавоб оласиз:
• Ўзбекистон фуқароси чет элдан ўз автомобилини ҳайдаб олиб кириши мумкинми?
• Совға қилинган ёки ютилган автомобиль қандай тартибда олиб кирилади?
• Ишончнома асосида бошқа шахс номидаги автомобилни ол…
💵 25$ ga ro’yhatdan o’tmaslik uchun, hozir bepul vaqti o’tib olilar talabalar.
👩🔬 1–3-iyul kunlari Seulda Koreya kosmetika sanoatining eng yirik va katta xalqaro ko‘rgazmalaridan biri bo‘lib o‘tadi. 🧴✨
Bu sohani o‘rganish, yangi trendlarni tahlil qilish, distribyutorlar hamda yangi mijozlar topish uchun juda katta imkoniyat.
Kelinglar, bozorni o‘rganinglar va yangi hamkorlar topinglar. Barchaga biznesda omad! 👍🔥
…
🌍 Dunyo bo‘ylab sayohat qilishni orzu qilasizmi?
🇺🇸🇪🇺🇦🇺🇨🇦🇮🇹🇪🇸Yoki turizm sohasida o‘z biznesingizni boshlamoqchimisiz?
✈️Hozir Seul shahrida turizm olamidagi eng yirik tadbirlardan biri — Seoul International Travel Fair 2026 bo‘lib o‘tmoqda.
Bu yerda siz:
✅ Dunyoning turli mamlakatlari va sayyohlik kompaniyalari bilan tanishasiz
✅ Yangi hamkorlar va biznes aloqalarini topasiz
✅ Turizm sohasidagi eng so‘nggi trend …
💸 O‘rtadagi dilerlarsiz, to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri Koreya zavodlaridan eng eng ARZON OPTOM narxlarda kosmetika olish siri!
Kosmetika sohasida o‘z ishini boshlamoqchi bo‘lganlar yoki allaqachon shu biznesda yurganlar bormi?
Hozir dunyoda K-Beauty, ya’ni Koreya kosmetikasi trendda ekanligini yaxshi bilasiz. Shundoq imkoniyat borida uni qo‘ldan boy bermaslik kerak, ayniqsa Koreyada yashab turib!
To‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri brendlarn…
🚀 Psixologiyada inqilob: Siz ham "boshqachasiz"mi?
Psixologiyada odamlarni faqat ikki turga bo‘lishgan: Ekstrovert (ochiq, faol) va Introvert (sokin, yopiq).
Lekin shaxsan men hech biriga mos emasdim. Gohida gavjum shaharlar va restoranlar yoqsa, gohida telefonni o‘chirib, tog‘lar yoki dengiz sohilida yolg‘iz qolishni, tabiatni tinglashni istayman.
Sizda ham shundaymi?
Demak, siz ham mendek Otravertsiz! Yaqinda ol…
Bu kanalda biz birgalikda:
• 🏕️ Sokinliksevarlar uchun: Go‘zal tabiat qo‘ynida kemping 🪵 va backpacking 🎒 sirlarini sizga o‘rgataman.
• ⛵️ Suv sporti va sayohatlar: Okeanda kruizlar 🛳️🌊, jo‘shqin daryolarda kayaking 🚣♂️, dayving 🤿🐟 va rafting 🌊🛶 hayajonini birga his qilamiz!
• 🧗♂️ Mutlaq adrenalin: Ekstremal tog‘ cho‘qqilarini zabt etish 🥾, parashyut 🪂 va paraplanda 🪁 uchish olamiga yo‘l boshlayman!
• 🌏 Tarixiy…
15 yil oldin men ham xuddi siz kabi — boshqalarning sayohatlariga qarab, “Qachon men ham dunyo kezarkanman?” deb orzu qilardim.💭
Menga ishoning, sayohatlarni shunchaki Instagram orqali tomosha qilish emas, ularni real hayotda, butun vujud bilan his qilish vaqti keldi! 🌍✨
Dunyo bo‘ylab ko‘p yillik sayohatlarim, samolyotda Yer sharini 5.2 marta aylanishga teng parvozlarim ✈️☁️, zabt etilgan ulkan cho‘qqilar 🏔️, cheks…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kashfiyot_sari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kashfiyot_sari named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kashfiyotlar_sari named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kahsfiyot sari” (@kashfiyot_sari), 55 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashfiyot_sari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
