Channel
@kashchenko66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
345subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002506732967 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kashchenko66 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kashchenko66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 345 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 346 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 346 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
303 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 202 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 9.57% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 5.61% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 4.95% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 2.97% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 2.64% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.98% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 1.98% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 1.98% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фрагмент небольшой работы, написанной для сборника "Слово и камень" под редакцией Д. Остроумова. Извините, что редко посещаю тг, ибо борьба с VPN-сервисами не входит в мои творческие планы
❤11😎3🔥1
https://vk.com/@akashchenko-vidimoe-i-nevidimoe
❤14👍4🤔1🙏1
пишу о Тарковском Андрей Арсеньевич порадовал в очередной раз, взялся плотно за изучение его монтажа, и очень много интересного открылось)
❤17🔥4👍3🤔1
Приглашаем на обсуждение фильмов «Игры в полях Господних» и «Апокалипсис» ☀️18 апреля, 19:00 В этот раз руководитель «Солнца Севера» Николай Арутюнов, искусствовед Александр Кащенко (t.me/kashchenko66) и публицист Кирилл Мазаев (t.me/where_is_reality) обсудят сразу два фильма, посвящённых такой разной и такой схожей судьбе коренных народов Америки, «Игры в полях Господних» и «Апокалипто»: - силовая христианизация …
❤8👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤33🔥1
Постящийся Будда (Истощенный Будда), II-III век н.э. Найден при раскопках в Гандхаре — историко-культурной области на северо-западе современного Пакистана. Согласно легенде, Сиддхартха Гаутама (будущий Будда Шакьмуни) пытался достичь просветления через строгую аскезу. Он держал пост 6 лет и довел свое тело до полного истощения, однако просветление так и не наступило. Это заставило Сиддхартху понять, что крайние меры…
❤11💯3🤔3👍2💔2
Все эти сети социальные ересь сущая ... жаль, конечно, добряков, которые свои силы затратили на поддержание этого голема()()
❤9💯7🌚2🔥2🤔1🤷♂1
А есть ли смысл сюда что-то писать??) ... Летом будет книга в АСТ-ЛЕД, переходим на старообрядческий печатный формат. Вперёд к архаике!
❤26✍5😎3🌚2
Всех несомненно прекрасных женщин с праздником
❤31🕊3🌚2👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥11👍2👏1
устюгов Тихо, незаметно проскользнула в Петербурге недельная выставка Геннадия Афанасьевича Устюгова (1937-2025) - главного аутсайдера художественной жизни Ленинграда/Петербурга. Завсегдатай всяческих пнд, Устюгов был живой легендой. Его живописи невозможно подражать, по его страдальческому пути немыслимо следовать. "Чувства добрые я лирой пробуждал" - это точно про Устюгова ... ✔️Скорбящая.1977. Холст, масло, 37 …
🔥10❤8🕊2🤔2
Софроний (Сахаров) о Серафиме Саровском "Редко кто помнит, что подле него мало кто мог ужиться. Небесный огонь, который нес в себе преподобный Серафим и которым горели его душа и сердце, был невыносим для многих его современников". Разумеется, невыносим он и сейчас, вероятно поэтому образ одного из величайших русских аскетов сведен до "любвеобильного доброго дедушки с мишкой", занимательного персонажа детских книже…
❤19💯5✍4👍2🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kashchenko66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,070,438 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARS SACRA []” (@kashchenko66), 345 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashchenko66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.