Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for картон с рофлами

Channel

картон с рофлами

@kartonisdead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

230subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002142481109
TypeChannel
Username@kartonisdead
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kartonisdead

Growth

23014 Aug 2026, 06:48 — 230 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 230 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 06:4815 Aug 2026, 05:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 229–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:18230no change
14 Aug 2026, 06:48230first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.7%
avg views ÷ 230 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total687
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15851.1%
🔥4614.9%
🤡268.41%
🍾175.50%
👀175.50%
🍌165.18%
👍113.56%
🤩113.56%
😨51.62%
💅20.647%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC86 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @neyz1n_newsPhoto

Ремейкнул свой старый арт Картону который я нарисовал ему в 2024 году, Рендеры комнаты и альтернативная версия арта показались мне прикольными так что их тоже скину

12🔥7🤡6🤩2🍌1

12 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC96 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

НУ ВЫ ТОКА ПОСМОТРИТЕ!!!!

7🤡3

5 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC198 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanapivooPhoto

с прошедним, огрызок картона. другие варианты фильтров будут в комментариях, и да, админ наконец-то начинает рисовать.

21🍾3🤡3🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC307 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

всем ку мне 19

32🍾14🔥6🤡2

14 Jul 2026, 00:05 UTC418 views48 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

причина почему нет никаких новостей проста. я работаю, not unemployment anymore. картон 200 списанных нагетсов. картон 79 сырых котлет. картон 2 самосделанных чикенбургера. вообщем, как-то так😃

41🤡4🔥3

19 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC530 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @LololoshkaUSE

Кто этот ваш Ларполошка, черт возьми?!

👀15

17 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC488 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

чуть-чуть сайд проечу (ЕСЛИ ЭТО ВООБЩЕ МОЖНО ТАК НАЗВАТЬ) подсел на хайп трейн ларптюберов, не знаю будет ли потом смысл делать полноценный ролик про этот тренд, потому что не думаю что тема стоящая, но так оно так. (я не умер)

🔥155🍌1

29 May 2026, 10:03 UTC565 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okSsI0mHND4 ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ!!!!

🔥142🍌2🤡1

28 May 2026, 23:43 UTC517 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍113🤡3🍌1

27 May 2026, 12:33 UTC486 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026

видео должно выйти в эту пятницу!!!

26🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kartonisdead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,112,769 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“картон с рофлами” (@kartonisdead), 230 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kartonisdead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.