Channel
@karma_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,257subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001243998258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karma_en |
| Description | Instant Karma moments caught on camera Buy Ad: @BADitel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karma_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 10,257 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 10,261 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 10,271 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 10,274 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 10,285 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 10,289 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 10,289 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
467 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 56 | 12.0% | |
| 🤣 | 55 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 10.1% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 8.78% | |
| 🕊 | 41 | 8.78% | |
| 🥱 | 36 | 7.71% | |
| 🤮 | 31 | 6.64% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 6.42% | |
| 🤡 | 16 | 3.43% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 2.78% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 2.78% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 2.57% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 2.14% | |
| 😨 | 10 | 2.14% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 1.93% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 1.71% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 0.857% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.857% | |
| 10 further kinds | 21 | 4.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😱 Ark Invest just dropped some wild numbers In 2025, AI-generated words officially outnumbered words written by humans — for the first time in history. At this pace, AI will surpass the entire 500-year archive of human-written text before 2030. And it's already reshaping Telegram. Channels are quietly replacing human editors with automated tools — and one of the most interesting examples is @morty, built by the @ma…
🤮7❤4👎1
Gave a kid to play with.🙈
🤣31👌13❤11👏4🥱3🤡2
A horse on a walk. What's wrong? 😜
🤮15🥴7❤6😁3🔥2🗿2🦄2❤🔥1
Death Leap. 😳
🕊15🤬6🥱4🌚3❤2😁2👏1🤡1
Got himself in the car.
🕊11😁7❤3🤯2👏1🤬1😭1
He's got it going on.
👏34❤4🥱2👍1👎1
Dude got caught in a potato rain.💦
😁6🥱3😢3❤1🤡1🤩1
The guys mislaid a huge dump truck, this miscalculation cost the lives of several of them.😳
😱11🥱5❤1😭1
You got the video! 👍🏻
😢6👏4😁4👍3🥱2❤1
Have a safe trip! 😏
😁9🍌5🥱3❤1
😄 Experienced rescuer
🤣13😁6😱4🥱3
The man disappeared after being struck by a car.😳
😨5😱5🤔3🥱1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @karma_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Instant Karma!” (@karma_en), 10,257 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karma_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.