2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:22
192
no change
26 Sept 2026, 18:47
192
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.2%
avg views ÷ 192 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
11 (13 February 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
424
Reactions total
63
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
193
Videos
13
Links
38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 59s
Average length
2m 59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
197 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
154
78.2%
🔥
31
15.7%
✍
7
3.55%
custom 5449723275628259037
5
2.54%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 11 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @karinskyorden. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2026 to 15 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💜 У инженеров и врачей есть что-то общее — они могут стать Al-тренерами-экспертами. Это «наставники» для ИИ, которые делают его ответы точными и полезными. Поговорили с Кариной, которая руководит командой AI-тренеров, о том, как устроена новая профессия.
↘️ До конца года Яндекс привлечёт тысячу AI-тренеров-экспертов к обучению Алисы АI. Если вы профи в своей области и хотите попробовать себя в этой профессии, оставл…
❤️ На прошлой неделе отгремела первая в России конференция про AI-тренеров от Яндекса
Поговорили про ИИ, обучение моделей, найм. Я была одним из спикеров. И это дневник благодарностей за предоставленную возможность, доверие и полученный опыт ❤️
🤖 Я рассказывала про эпидемию (нейро)слопа, а ещё про то, как нейронки научились виртуозно врать и кто может их остановить
Фотокарточки, ссылка на трансляцию и всю необходи…
«Наивность оптимизма и озлобленность пессимизма»
— уже сутки кручу в голове прочитанную фразу, которая врезалась мне в сознание, и сокрушаюсь, что она не моя. Никак не хотела комментировать, но все же озвучу контекст:
«Мироощущение Гомера — это высшее спокойствие и просветленность духа, который изведал и неистовый восторг, и неистовое отчаяние и поднялся выше обоих — над наивностью оптимизма и озлобленностью пессим…
🌍 К дню защиты детей: хаотичное о детях и родителях из третьих уст
Эта заметка не об эксплуатации детского труда, она не носит политический или научный характер и представляет собой исключительно личное мнение.
Я не эксперт, своих детей у меня нет, но есть годы преподавания — 8 лет наблюдений со стороны, и мысли на тему. Может показаться, что этого мало, да, но предметы — русский и английский языки и литература — н…
❤️🩹 О памяти. Письмо сороковое.
В честь праздника Великой Победы цитирую «Письма о добром и прекрасном» Д.С. Лихачёва. Оставляю вам возможность изучить текст самостоятельно по ссылке. Здесь привожу письмо в сокращении.
Память — одно из важнейших свойств бытия, любого бытия: материального, духовного, человеческого…
Лист бумаги. Сожмите его и расправьте. На нем останутся складки, и если вы сожмете его вторично — ча…
Меня очень интересует такой вопрос: чувствовали ли вы, что повзрослели? Как это было?
Конечно, есть научные теории о взрослении — физическом, эмоциональном, психологическому, различные периодизации, но то, что занимает меня, это внутреннее, субъективное ощущение.
Я не знаю, можно ли повзрослеть окончательно (но я точно не в этой точке), но по себе знаю, что у взросления есть стадии или ступени.
Идею, помимо приобр…
О воспоминаниях
Увидев меня в первый раз, мама подумала, что по сравнению с моим братом, родившимся двумя годами раньше, я выгляжу слабым, хрупким и худеньким.
«Мама подумала..» Я употребил здесь простое прошедшее время, а надо было бы — прошедшее с окончанием — miş. Я очень люблю это время, которое в турецком языке используется, когда мы рассказываем сказки, говорим о своих снах и вообще о том, что на самом деле с…
О фотографиях
Сегодня ко мне в руки попала книга, которая сразу меня очень зацепила — она начинается с одной из моих самых любимых тем — темы воспоминаний — и, буду надеяться, что название не врет, в целом им посвящена. Делюсь!
…Мы делали фотографии для того, чтобы можно было потом вспомнить запечатленные на них моменты. Когда снимали нас, мы смотрели в объектив и позировали, чтобы другие — преимущественно наши дру…
⭐️ Скоро в Яндексе будет проходить Интенсив для будущих AI‑тренеров с офером в Крауд
Мы ждем людей, которые умеют работать с текстом и хотят попробовать себя в обучении ИИ ✍️
Что будет?
⭐️ Прослушайте вебинары и разберитесь в специфике работы с источниками информации, познакомьтесь с Редакцией ИИ и изучите принципы фактчека. В конце ждёт тест для доступа ко второму дню
⭐️ Познакомьтесь с шефами команд AI-тренеров, …
🇹🇷11 февраля в Турции заработал наш суперапп — Yandex AI
А сегодня Yandex AI возглавил топ App Store в Турции.
Наш, потому что команда редакторов, которой я руковожу, и еще несколько команд коллег занималась human input в обучении модели для приложения.
Модель внутри приложения обучалась с учетом культурных особенностей региона и в тесном сотрудничестве с носителями турецкого языка.
Браузерную версию мы запустили…
❤20🔥7custom 54497232756282590375
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @karinskyorden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НОВОСИБИРСК | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ @Novosibirsk_nov · 20,617 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Каринский орден” (@karinskyorden), 192 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karinskyorden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
