еще завел 🟢 livestream-канал рука не поднимается щитпостить в этот, а иногда так хочется! лфг @karfly_livestream
❤23👍11
Signed Karim Iskakov

Channel
@karim_iskakov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,042subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001141002821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karim_iskakov |
| Description | Обо мне: karfly.github.io – @karfly |
| Created | 25 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karim_iskakov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 7,042 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 7,047 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 7,053 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,054 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 7,054 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,276 reactions across 20 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,586 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,034 | 24.2% | |
| 👍 | 474 | 11.1% | |
| 🤯 | 224 | 5.24% | |
| 🍾 | 177 | 4.14% | |
| 👏 | 125 | 2.92% | |
| 🖕 | 100 | 2.34% | |
| 🎉 | 93 | 2.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 1.38% | |
| 🥰 | 58 | 1.36% | |
| 🤣 | 43 | 1.01% | |
| 🦄 | 38 | 0.889% | |
| 💩 | 33 | 0.772% | |
| 🤡 | 33 | 0.772% | |
| 🤮 | 28 | 0.655% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 0.585% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 0.538% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 0.398% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.327% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 0.327% | |
| 18 further kinds | 78 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2023 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @karim_iskakov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2023 to 15 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
еще завел 🟢 livestream-канал рука не поднимается щитпостить в этот, а иногда так хочется! лфг @karfly_livestream
❤23👍11
Signed Karim Iskakov
📁 pdfchatgpt.com: Удобный экспорт ChatGPT в PDF (c 'ssyoutube'-лайфхаком) Предыстория: Я очень активно пользуюсь ChatGPT (более 1000 сообщений в месяц). Часто хочется поделиться результатами с друзьями или коллегами, но стандартные share-ссылки ChatGPT работают отвратительно: часто не открываются, постоянно требуют принять куки, перекидывают в приложение на телефоне, быстро протухают и т.д. Раньше я решал это так: …
🔥100👍30❤23✍3
Signed Karim Iskakov
Привет. Как ты? Чёт так давно не общались, я уже соскучился… Мы вот с Серафимом подкаст засняли. Сам еще не успел посмотреть, т.к. в горах сейчас, и интернет тут не очень. Название кликбейтное (сам понимаешь, такие правила игры), но содержание максимально искреннее. Там в целом про мой путь, стартапчики и всё такое. Короче глянь, если интересно, и напиши как тебе. А я уже скоро вернусь, и зажжём как раньше ❤️ 📺 y…
❤67🔥23👍16🤝4😴2
Signed Karim Iskakov
+1 exit 🫨
🔥69❤20🤯7
Signed Karim Iskakov
❤️ GasPump joins BabyDoge family We're thrilled to announce that GasPump is now part of the BabyDoge ecosystem! BabyDoge is one of the world’s best meme community. But not just community... It's a whole ecosystem with products like BabyDoge Swap, Telegram game, own NFTs, and so much more. Visit BabyDoge's group and CoinMarketCap to learn more. The ⛽️ GasPump team is here to stay, and we'll keep pushing forward to …
👏39❤19👍19💩5👎3🔥2😢2
Signed Karim Iskakov
#freedurov
❤148🤣43🔥25🕊17🤨13💩11❤🔥10🙏9
Signed Karim Iskakov
Сыграем в ⭐️-игру? Сегодня 🍰 Телеграму 11 лет! В честь этого вышли клевые обновления (не забудьте обновить прилу): 1. Можно создавать платные каналы с рекуррентной подпиской в звездах. С такой механикой можно легко реализовать подписку на любой продукт в боте, проверяя, является ли юзер подписчиком канала (последний гвоздь в гроб @subgram 🥲) 2. Можно оставлять звездные платные ⭐️-реакции на посты в каналах. 1 тык …
🖕100🔥31🤯20🤡17❤13😁12👍6⚡3
Signed Karim Iskakov
TON Sites – karfly.ton Вчера Телеграм выпустил обновление, в котором они прокачали миниаппы (теперь юзер может видеть MAU любого бота), а также представили встроенный браузер. У этого браузера есть одна прикольная фича – нативная поддержка TON Sites. Помимо самого блокчейна, разработчики TON сделали свою сетевую технологию с помощью которой общаются узлы-валидаторы. Эта сеть децентрализована, анонимна и устойчива. …
❤59🔥44👍25👏3❤🔥1🎃1💋1🤔1
Signed Karim Iskakov
🐹 В чем бизнес модель хомяка Думаю, вы слышали про Hamster Kombat. Это miniapp-кликер, в котором можно зарабатывать монетки, тапая по экрану и выполняя простые задания. Это самый большой miniapp – в нем 250M+ юзеров, а это 25% от MAU всего Телеграма! Все юзеры упорно тапают, потому что в итоге их набранные монетки будут сконвертированы в токены (которые будут что-то стоить... наверное). В это играет очень много реа…
👍179❤27🤯25💯8🤮8⚡3🔥2🤔1
Signed Karim Iskakov
Для тех, кто плохо шарит в крипте, вот этот видос хорошо объясняет суть ⛽️ GasPump: youtube.com/watch?v=K6a4ExkYJdo
👍33👎18🤡12❤🔥8🤮5💩4❤1😱1
Signed Karim Iskakov
Месяц назад мы с @serafimcloud и командой запустили ⛽️ GasPump – мемкоин-лаучпад на 💎 TON. За TON'ом я начал следить с его самого старта, был активным юзером и всегда хотел что-то на нем сделать. Недавно кто-то из криптанов в нашем deYC-сообществе скинул ссылку на pump.fun (обязательно зайдите и зацените дизайн, ахах). pump.fun работает на блокчейне Solana и сейчас взрывает крипту – несколько дней назад, они на коми…
❤100🔥69🦄17🤮12👍11👎4❤🔥3🤔3
Signed Karim Iskakov
В Телеграме появится внутренняя валюта ⭐️ Telegram Stars Сейчас получил "письмо счастья", что начиная с 12 июня все оплаты за цифровые товары в ботах и миниаппах надо будет эксклюзивно принимать в валюте Telegram Stars. Тут ключевое слово "эксклюзивно". По новым правилам будет запрещено принимать деньги с помощью любимого Страйпа или ЮКассы. Это все из-за давления со стороны Apple, которому не нравится, что внутри …
🤯40😢18❤8👍5🔥3🤮3🤔2😱2
Signed Karim Iskakov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @karim_iskakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 226,420 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Karim Iskakov - канал” (@karim_iskakov), 7,042 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karim_iskakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.