БЕШЕНСТВО ! ! ! ! !
custom 52539209306939226266

Channel
@kargedor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003270565691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kargedor |
| Description | 81+ рейтинг потому что сиськи письки и кишки иногда случаются в моей жизни. анонимка http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=hashasky личка @generalhashaskyy |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kargedor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 279 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 279 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
699 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253920930693922626 | 188 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5251350143659164909 | 166 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5253575782827049194 | 166 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5460914753515829485 | 131 | 18.7% | |
| custom 5436349073886050787 | 32 | 4.58% | |
| custom 5343552242416906397 | 7 | 1.00% | |
| custom 5253526841674711249 | 4 | 0.572% | |
| custom 5242453552697218561 | 3 | 0.429% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 0.286% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 699reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kargedor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 April 2026 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
БЕШЕНСТВО ! ! ! ! !
custom 52539209306939226266
привет а я тебя помню это же ты тот самый частый клиент клуб клуба нет блин извини кажется я обозналась извини чувак реально прости
custom 525392093069392262614custom 53435522424169063976custom 52513501436591649093custom 52535757828270491943
а знаете настенька мне очень нравится когда у девочек в аниме большие груди
custom 525357578282704919442custom 543634907388605078732custom 525135014365916490916custom 52424535526972185613custom 52539209306939226263
OOOOUUUUWWWWUIUUWW²
custom 52513501436591649094custom 52539209306939226263
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 525135014365916490911custom 52539209306939226265custom 52535268416747112494❤2
OUUUUWWWWUUIUYUU💗💗💗
custom 52535757828270491948custom 54609147535158294854custom 52513501436591649093custom 52539209306939226261
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 546091475351582948510custom 52535757828270491946custom 52513501436591649093custom 52539209306939226262
это что за набег произошел щас.
custom 525392093069392262613custom 52535757828270491944custom 54609147535158294852
старая картинка кстати незаконченная но она мил пускай лежит
custom 525135014365916490952custom 546091475351582948515custom 525392093069392262614custom 52535757828270491941
можно я приду и буду только випки постить раз в год посредством фотографирования экрана ну и все хватит вам
custom 525392093069392262629custom 52535757828270491949custom 52513501436591649095custom 54609147535158294851
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 546091475351582948530custom 525357578282704919413custom 52539209306939226267custom 52513501436591649091
бля почему гифка. ладно
custom 525392093069392262615custom 54609147535158294852custom 53435522424169063971
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kargedor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 121,524 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“k4rg3d0r” (@kargedor), 279 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kargedor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.