Channel
@kardiozvonok
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
400subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001429812903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kardiozvonok |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kardiozvonok |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 400 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 403 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 404 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 405 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 408 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 408 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хирурги из Татарстана удалили «дьявольский рог» у пациента В ГАУЗ «Городская больница № 5» Набережных Челнов обратился мужчина с гигантской роговой кератомой. В народе она называется «дьявольским рогом». Специалисты больницы не нашли информацию о том, что подобная операция ранее проводилась в России. Образование у него появилось в 2022 году. Сначала оно его не беспокоило, но «рог» продолжал расти, со временем у пац…
😱6🤔2❤1
Для пациентов обнаружить атеросклеротические бляшки в сосудах сердца помогают КТ-ангиография (компьютерная томография с контрастом) и классическая коронарография. Вот основные исследования, разделенные по их назначению: КТ-ангиография коронарных артерий — самый точный неинвазивный метод (без операции). Пациенту вводят контраст через вену и делают снимки на томографе. Метод показывает саму бляшку, её размер и состав…
👍3🔥3
✈️ Долгие перелеты и риск тромбоза, как защитить себя от ТЭЛА Если вам предстоит длительный перелет, важно помнить о «тромбозе путешественника» - состоянии, которое может привести к жизнеугрожающей тромбоэмболии легочной артерии (ТЭЛА). Для здоровых людей без дополнительных факторов риск минимален, но знать правила безопасности полезно всем ⬇️ Долгое сидение в кресле самолета + малое количество выпитой жидкости = …
🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
😱1
Друзья мои пациенты дорогие Спасибо всем за тёплое поздравления живём и работаем дальше вместе❤️
❤5👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
🎭«Мне доктор назначил аскорутин, чтобы сосуды не были ломкие.»🤯 Аааа!!!! Ломкие? Вы серьезно? И это я не пациенту!!!! ⠀ Иногда кажется, что образованием врачей занимаются фармпредставители, а не ВУЗы. Вопрос даже не в доказательности, а в здравом смысле. Только вот где он, когда доктор назначает «аскорутинчик» пациенту с махровым (простите за сленг) варикозом якобы для укрепления вен🤦🏻♂️, или другой, при еле выражен…
👍6
Летний лайфхак 🌞 Рекомендация как не сгореть на солнце или как помочь тем, кто уже пострадал!
👍4
Урсосан пить? «Всю жизнь так лечили..» - культовая фраза. Которая будто ставит точку во всех вопросах. Обработать рану хлоргексидином или пописать на нее? Так всю жизнь так делали! И ничего. Вы будете писать или цивилизованно обработаете? Так не пойдет. И Урсосан тоже не пойдет. Не лечит он запор и загиб желчного пузыря. И жировой гепатоз не лечит. И желчь гнать не умеет. Для чего вообще нужен Урсосан? Полное имя - …
👍6
Во время операции хирург контролирует стент тремя основными способами: Рентген с контрастом (ангиография): В сосуд вводят специальное вещество, которое светится на рентгене. Врач на экране в реальном времени видит, как расправился стент и потекла ли по нему кровь. Специальные компьютерные программы (например, StentViz) могут искусственно делать картинку четче, подсвечивая металлический каркас. Взгляд изнутри (внутр…
❤1👍1
А как проверяют, что стент стоит правильно? Полностью раскрыт и нет смещения?
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kardiozvonok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кабинет доктора Калюжного” (@kardiozvonok), 400 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kardiozvonok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.