Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крась, Карась!

@karaskras

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

635subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002240592291
TypeChannel
Username@karaskras
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/karaskras

Growth

6356376366 August 2026 — 637 subscribers6 August 2026 — 637 subscribers13 August 2026 — 635 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 635–637 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:28635-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:32637no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:07637first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.1%
avg views ÷ 635 subscribers
Avg views / post
343
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (19 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,060
Reactions total479
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,145 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50243.8%
🔥36531.9%
🥰827.16%
😁645.59%
👍453.93%
😍221.92%
❤‍🔥151.31%
💔110.961%
🤣100.873%
🐳70.611%
👏70.611%
🙈50.437%
🤔40.349%
🤩40.349%
💯10.087%
🤝10.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC174 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Врата Масляные краски на бумаге, немного темперы для деревьев До того, как нарисовала, хотела назвать "Цербер"

🔥3611🤣10🥰6👏2

1 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC224 views77 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Разворот выглядит так Гуашь

🔥4829

30 Jul 2026, 04:35 UTC319 views108 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Гуашь Вот накатывает иногда желание не просто "заниматься рисованием", а "создавать искусство". И не беззубое искусство, а чтобы как в 17 лет – с запалом и задором. И зрелое при этом: не в лоб и без максимализма. Но я в очередной раз выбрала быть счастливой, а не страдать, и просто нарисовала мох.

56🔥36❤‍🔥8🐳7💯1

27 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC366 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уже много лет называю Саймона Столенхага в числе своих любимых художников. Подумалось, что я ни разу не пыталась у него ничего скопировать, хотя обожаю световые эффекты и атмосферу его работ. Немножко странно было перерисовывать диджитал темперой. Как будто бы гуашью или маслом было бы проще передать туман

🔥3824😍9🥰3👍2

23 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC462 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Масло+масляная пастель В кои-то веки настоящий пленэр. На полчасика, без претензии на произведение искусства. На обычную плотную бумагу отлично вообще масло ложится, даже не ожидала, что настолько

47👍10🥰3

20 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC515 views93 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Куриная зарисовка Гуашь

67🥰16😁8🤩2

15 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC615 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Теперь каждый год я стараюсь участвовать в летних марафонах от Калачеваскул. В этот раз не очень сложилось: никак не успеваю по качественной картинке в день выдавать. Только если по так себе картинке. Так что пусть будет один итоговый рисунок за целый марафон – больше, чем ничего

52🔥12🥰3🤩2❤‍🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC587 views112 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Внезапное включение с облепихой гуашью. Больше месяца живу практически без интернета. Работают только ВК, озон и авито – самое необходимое (нет)

🔥6319🥰19💔6👍5

23 May 2026, 09:57 UTC759 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Книга, которую я очень ждала. Подписана на иллюстратора. Покажу страницы в комментариях, они шикарные. #книжкиповыходным

🔥24😍13❤‍🔥6👍53

20 May 2026, 12:33 UTC693 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Долгое время я игнорировала факт блокировки/замедления телеграма, потому что и без этого хватало забот. На самом деле это сильно неприятно. Мне обычно лень искать обходные пути. Никаких соцсетей не веду больше, только пинтерест. Если решусь ещё куда-то выкладывать рисунки, укажу ссылку и там, и здесь. А вы есть ещё где-то, кроме тг? Удобен ли вк? Я в основном вижу мнения, что нет. P.S. смотрю на ники людей, заинтере

😁34🙈5🤔43

15 May 2026, 22:47 UTC647 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Впечатления по поводу ещё одной выставки. «Неслучайная живопись» Максима Моргунова в Берёзке. Не могу не заметить, что галерея в очередной раз переехала. Место снова шикарное. Я прямо-таки влюбилась в две работы автора: с борщевиками и с деревом (которая на афише). Остальные тоже нравятся. Большие картины у него стоят по 1-4 млн рублей. Посмотрела в каталоге. Особой популярностью пользуются картины с подсолнухами. Ин

22🔥7

14 May 2026, 21:21 UTC505 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рассказываю с опозданием об уже закончившихся выставках. Но сходить в этот музей я рекомендую и без выставки. Особняк Румянцева неожиданно порадовал доброжелательными смотрительницами и приятной атмосферой. Несмотря на то, что музей находится в самом центре Петербурга, знают о нём далеко не все, и смотреть залы вместе с толпами туристов вряд ли придётся. #музеиигалереи Остальные фотографии в комментариях

13🥰8🔥4😁2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @karaskras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 937,863 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крась, Карась!” (@karaskras), 635 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karaskras.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.