Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Катя и нейросети

@karakat_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960775418
TypeChannel
Username@karakat_ai
DescriptionЯ промпт-мейкер и нейроэнтузиаст. А это моя записная книжка. Канал для того, чтобы смотреть на меняющийся прямо сейчас мир. Экспериментировать, тащить мемы, новости и промпты, дрессировать Claude и ChatGPT, офигевать от Nano Banana Pro, вот это всё.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/karakat_ai

Growth

1218 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 121 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 121 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:479 Aug 2026, 03:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:46121no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:47121first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.1
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (30 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total430
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,930
Videos
425
Links
937

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1076.9%
215.4%
🔥17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ладно, Codex — это чума. Когда агенты хайпанули, я их все тыкала, но было ощущение, что геморроя больше, чем пользы. Сейчас это не так. Я им пока ничего не разрабатываю и всё такое, пока просто порядок на компе навожу. Например, сейчас вон выбрал мне из всего склада в папке Downloads доки с медицинскими записями, сложил их в отдельную папочку, переименовал по единому стандарту и дубли удалил.

1

7 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Периодически я читаю в канале Гигачата, что там предлагают сгенерировать. Копирую промпт прям из поста — не сама что-то неумело пишу, нет. Тыкаю в бот собственно Гигачата. И вспоминаю, почему не им обычно пользуюсь. Сегодня была открытка с котом и ромашками: пятисерийная драма "Гигачат и русские буквы".

😁1

5 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC28 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @neural85gbPhoto

Как облегчить себе жизнь, рассказываю: Кидаем картинку в GPT, лучше всего для этого использовать их Codex, просим разбить на составляющие и каждую составляющую сгенерировать отдельно в хорошем качестве в формате png без фона и, собственно, сам фон. Можно прям подробно расписать, какие именно составные части нужны. Кодекс это всё в папочку упакует из ассетов. Далее пересобираем макет и уже отдельную фразу, которую Ж

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Блин, и это правда работает! Я сейчас закинула в Codex картинку рандомную, отошла поесть, прихожу — на компе натурально лежат отдельными файлами все элементы отдельными PNG с прозрачным фоном (не клеточками нарисованными, а реально прозрачным, а то бывало, знаете ли).

5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @neural85gb

Я тута кодекс хвалила за то, шо он может создать папку с картинками. Так вот. Перехвалила. Этот кусок кринжа сгенерировал мне картинку папки с картинками. Сссска 🤧

😁4

30 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC50 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @t_technocultPhoto

ИИ-агрегаторы — это сервисы, с помощью которых можно получить доступ к разным моделям по общей подписке или за покупку токенов. Они работают в России без ограничений и принимают оплату российскими картами. Собрали несколько ИИ-агрегаторов и рассказали, как ими пользоваться и какие модели в них доступны: https://t-j.ru/t-tg/ai-agregators

30 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ещё Whisper, если запись начинается с тишины, пишет «редактор (какая-то фамилия), корректор (ещё какая-то)» раз за разом.

30 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bookninjaPhoto

Гениальное: оказывается, модель Whisper, расшифровывающая речь, время от времени рандомно вставляет в текст одну и ту же фразу про мощнейшее безобразие. А поскольку у журналистов нет то ли времени, то ли желания сверять расшифровку с тем, что человек реально сказал, то эта фраза кочует по интервью десятков, если не сотен людей — и даже попадает в заголовки! Вот уж действительно мощнейшее безобразие (Я сам в быту пол

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ne_chi_piePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1

30 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026

Временно перестав болеть и разув глаза, посидела опять в нейросеточках безвылазно. Что я хочу сказать: 🌞 С ChatGPT Sol 5.6 в Work снова стало приятно писать тексты, вяяяяя! Умный, понимает! 🐸 С Fable 5 тоже, но есть нюанс: как только его из подписки вынесли, сразу стало видно, насколько это дорого. 🍌 В Gemini испортили Nano Banana! Даже "Пересоздать в Pro" стало реже спасать — жесть тупит, ааааа. Ну, то есть, по с

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @karakat_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Катя и нейросети” (@karakat_ai), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karakat_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.