نه خانه و کارِ دلپسندت دادند، برعکس، دو سه دهانبندت دادند. دیدند که اهلِ حلیِ درباری، عنوانِ بلندِ گوسفندت دادند. 🔹️🔹️ باد عطسه کند، برگِ خزان میافتد، سیبی که رسید، ناگهان میافتد. هر چیز، زمانِ انقضایی دارد، یک روز نقابِ رویمان میافتد. 🔹️🔹️ پرنده پرید! مرد! سیخش کردند! هر کس نفسِی کشید، کشتش کردند. تا نهالِ کوچکى درختی گردید، هم ارّه و هم تبر به ریشهاش کردند. 🔹️🔹️ مردی اگر ای باد، ببر این غم را. این غم که بغ…

Channel
رباعی - نو رباعی
@kar471
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,023subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001384359737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kar471 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kar471 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 2,023 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,024 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2,025 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 2,025 | first reading |
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 2,023 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 232
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 32
- of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,438 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
1/365 Вайроншуда аз ҷанг ҷаҳон месӯзад, Ин хок пур аз захми ниҳон месӯзад, Аз шарми тамошои ғами аҳли замин, Хуршед барои одамон месӯзад! Родмеҳр ویرانشده از جنگ جهان میسوزد، این خاک پر از زخم نهان میسوزد، از شرم تماشای غم اهل زمین، خورشید برای آدمان میسوزد! #رادمهر_سلیمانی_تاجیکستان
0354 این حسرتِ جاده چیست؟، چشمم روشن! وآن نیز پیاده؟! چیست؟ چشمم روشن! گفتی دیگر سراغ حیرت نروی! این پلک گشاده چیست؟ چشمم روشن! #محمدعلی_شیوا @jegargooshe_ha
#نورباعی ماهی، عجبی نیست؛ چرا تُنگش نیست...!؟ جدیست میوضوع؛ کجایی هِرکول...!؟☆ □ امیرحسین دیبایی @amir1972diba ☆ هرکول پوآرو: کارآگاهِ مشهورِ داستانهای جنایی
در معدن شعر مانده ام مستاصل از سنگ چگونه می توان حرف کشید؟ #نورباعی #رحیمی_رامهرمزی
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻 #ترانه #رباعی #ترانه_پیشینیان با دوست خوش است راز پنهان گفتن درد دل مستمند با جان گفتن دیروز غم خویش بگفتیم به یار امروز چنانیم که نتوان گفتن #فکری_مشهدی میر محمد جامه باف شناسا به میر رباعی 🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
#نورباعی آخر یک بیت نورباعی شد شعر؟ یکجای خیالات شما میلنگد! #محمدعلی_شیوا @jegargooshe_ha
ای رفته به خواب، روحِ آوارهٔ تو غیر از تو کسی نمیکند چارهٔ تو از خندهٔ صبح ساده مگذر، شاید با او خبر خوشیست دربارهٔ تو #میلاد_عرفانپور
یکعمر شکستم دل غم پرور را بر روی تو ناشیانه بستم در را امروز به احترامت ای حضرت عشق برداشتهام جای کلاهم سر را #واران
. ┈••✾• #نو_رباعی•✾••┈• این زخـم بدون بخیـه باشد خوب است؛ این بار به جـاے پوسـت چشمـم وا شـد! #شعر: #شهلا_منصورزاده @Sunflower_710 ⊰━⊰≼ِ✺≽≼ِ✺≽⊱━⊱
#نورباعی سیریم از این خودخوری بیحاصل در شهر شما گرسنگی سیری چند؟ #محمدعلی_شیوا @jegargooshe_ha
فریاد در اوج خشم تیغِ دولب است برخاست اگر رگت سرش جیغ بکش #اکرام_بسیم @ikrsim
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @kar471. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 165,430 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رباعی - نو رباعی” (@kar471), 2,023 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kar471.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.