Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Культура капитала

@kapcult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190141695
TypeChannel
Username@kapcult
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kapcult

Growth

142143142.57 August 2026 — 143 subscribers8 August 2026 — 143 subscribers14 August 2026 — 142 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:04142-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:31143no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:38143first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (19 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total315
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2646.4%
😁1730.4%
👍610.7%
🤔610.7%
🥰11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#хихи В предыдущем предложении план-капкан, разумеется, в том, что: а) Никто в 4% не поверит, все будут дисконтировать по 6-8%. Мы продаем сравнительно маленькое долгосрочное повышение сборов в обмен на пятилетний фронтлод + опцион на неизменность налогов на ближайшие, условно, 15 лет (до погашения пятого выпуска ОФZ10). б) Поскольку фронтлод должен капитализироваться, нетто сбор с бизнеса за весь срок, будет восп

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#макро #всякое Подумалось тут, что если с повышением налогов есть какая-то неизбывная проблема, можно бахнуть мирных ОФЗ. ОФZ. 10 лет, бескупонные, погашение по номиналу. В отчетности учитываем по номиналу. ЦБ берёт их в репо и учитывает в регуляторке по номиналу, резервируем, естественно, под 0. Размещать тоже по номиналу, почему бы и нет. И план-ураган по размещению. На 5 лет вперёд (не то чтобы я что-то знал, т

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#хихи Exclusive: US military asks troops for ‘creative and unconventional’ ideas to punish Iran Либо это прям игра-игра для нефти >100, либо план Б у Epic fury - Epic furry. Муад'диб обводнил бы Парс.

😁2

18 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC104 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#макро #Россия Если верить вбросу, кажется, что надо было все-таки налоги повышать, а не собирать непойми что в непредсказуемом объёме.

🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#хихи Целевой аудиторией был сам Трамп.

😁4

15 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC105 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наконец, вспоминаем вопросы из программы. Поговорили о чём хотели, нет? В сессии поставлены следующие вопросы. Что ждет мировую экономику в будущем? Как геополитическая напряженность и нарушения на глобальных товарных рынках повлияют на мировой экономический рост, потенциальный выпуск и инфляцию? Ответили - рост медленнее, инфляция выше, инвестиций больше, потребления меньше. Blood, sweat and tears. Всё как мы любим

🔥7🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заботкин - Значима ли фрагментация тех прогресса? Юдаева - ВВП Англии сегодня на 8-9% меньше, чем мог бы быть по прогнозам - это цена Брекзита. С другими технологиями и решениями эффект может быть похожим. Оставим в стороне проблему переоценки темпов роста западных стран и недооценки, например, Китая. Да, фрагментация уменьшает потенциал роста в мире, потому что снижает эффект от масштаба. Значит ли, что это снижен

🔥4🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Юдаева, теперь МВФ 4 важнейших фактора экономического развития: - Геоэкономическая фрагментация - надолго - ИИ - Климат - Демография Из них только ИИ может дать плюс к росту экономики. Спрос на инвестиции вырос (ИИ, климат) - это предполагает более высокие ставки. Энергопереход - раньше к нему подталкивал только климат, теперь - фрагментация и тех прогресс. Ормуз всех напугал. [Только Ормуз!] Ответ на топливный кри

🔥4🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вук Еремич (CIRSD; какой-то синктанк из Белграда и НЙ) Тезисы: - Хорошая модель для интерпретации геополитики - great power relations по Йену Бреммеру. Пользуется ей. - Экономика и политика цикличны. We're in political recession now, depression would mean world war. - Несмотря на политический кризис, no planning bad, scenarios good. Китайская пятилетка позволяет каждый год рекалибровать планы, несмотря на неопределё

🔥3🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#макро #мир #геополитика #дыбр Я пообещал оставить впечатления о сессии по мировой экономике с последнего финконгресса. Было заметно лучше, чем в прошлом году, хоть и немного неровно. Я поконспектировал основные тезисы и, местами, неизбежно вставил свои пять копеек. Спикеры ниже - в моем порядке. Рами Абулнага из ЦБ Египта Рассказал, что у них есть Суэц и много места под фотовольтаику. Сергей Улатов из ЕФСР ЕФС

👍2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kapcult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Культура капитала” (@kapcult), 142 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kapcult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.