Channel photo updated

Channel
๐ข ๐ ๐ ๐ถ ๐ ๐ถ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ช
@kamo_otz
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003344375168 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kamo_otz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 21 December 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kamo_otz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 55 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 54 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 55 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 55 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โคโ๐ฅ | 19 | 30.2% | |
| โค | 16 | 25.4% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 14.3% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 12.7% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ฅ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 7
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 9 we hold a reading for ยท 33%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @kamo_otz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 December 2025 to 22 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ะะตะปะฐั ัะพะทัะณััั ะฐะบะบะฐัะฝัะฐ ะะฐ 200 ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะธะบะพะฒ ะะธะดะฐะนัะต ะดััะทััะผ ะะฐ 2 ะผะตััะพ ะะะ ะฐะบ ะฟะพัะปะฐะฑะตะต ะ ะทะฐ 3 ะะะ 1000ะฐะปะผะฐะทะพะฒ
โค2๐1
ะัะฑะตัั ัะฐะฝะดะพะผะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะธะบะฐ ะฝะฐ 200 ะะะะะะกะจะะะะ
๐2๐1
ะะฐะฒะฝะพ ะฝะต ะฑัะปะพ ะทะดะตะปะพะบ ะฎะท @kamo_orig
ะก ะะะะซะ ะะะะะ
๐1
ะะขะ ะ ะกะะขะ ะก ะะะะซะ ะะะะะ ะะขะ ะ ะกะะขะ + ะ ะงะะข
โค2
แแชแกแชฮแ @Kamo_orig
โคโ๐ฅ7โค6๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2
ะะฐะบ ะดัะผะฐะตัะต ะดะพะฑัะผ ะปะธ ะผั ะะพ ะฝะพะฒะพะณะพ ะณะพะดะฐ 200 ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะธะบะพะฒ ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ
โคโ๐ฅ6๐3๐3โค1
#513 @Kamo_orig
โคโ๐ฅ6๐3โค2๐2
#510 @Kamo_orig
๐4โค3๐2๐2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kamo_otz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 160,337 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ข ๐ ๐ ๐ถ ๐ ๐ถ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ชโ (@kamo_otz), 55 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamo_otz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.