Summer vibesπ
π14π5customΒ 52605572908213969575β€4π2π₯2π₯°2customΒ 53165293089178334301

Channel
@kami_zaripova
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
139subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002049634044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kami_zaripova |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kami_zaripova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 139 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 140 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 141 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 141 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
230 reactions across 6 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 72 | 31.3% | |
| π₯ | 41 | 17.8% | |
| π | 18 | 7.83% | |
| π | 13 | 5.65% | |
| customΒ 5415949611317618929 | 12 | 5.22% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 10 | 4.35% | |
| customΒ 5409008750893734809 | 7 | 3.04% | |
| π | 7 | 3.04% | |
| π | 6 | 2.61% | |
| customΒ 5260557290821396957 | 5 | 2.17% | |
| customΒ 5361724897586350318 | 5 | 2.17% | |
| customΒ 5472211393677646774 | 5 | 2.17% | |
| β‘ | 5 | 2.17% | |
| π₯° | 5 | 2.17% | |
| customΒ 5258168752133910659 | 4 | 1.74% | |
| customΒ 5449442513616121857 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| customΒ 5318783359294382499 | 2 | 0.87% | |
| customΒ 5395353185843973296 | 2 | 0.87% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 0.87% | |
| customΒ 5316529308917833430 | 1 | 0.435% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Summer vibesπ
π14π5customΒ 52605572908213969575β€4π2π₯2π₯°2customΒ 53165293089178334301
HB to me!ππ€
β€25π6π₯5π3πΎ2π₯°1π1
πΆπ΄ππππ ππ ππππ π...
β€22β€βπ₯6π5customΒ 54494425136161218573π2π₯2customΒ 52581687521339106592customΒ 53187833592943824992
Video message, posted without a caption
β€10π₯8customΒ 54090087508937348095customΒ 53617248975863503184customΒ 54722113936776467743customΒ 52581687521339106592customΒ 53953531858439732962β‘1
Video message, posted without a caption
customΒ 541594961131761892912β€8π3π₯3π₯°2customΒ 54722113936776467742π1customΒ 54090087508937348091
NEWπ£π£π£
π₯21β‘4β€βπ₯4β€3π2customΒ 53617248975863503181customΒ 54090087508937348091
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @kami_zaripova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,034,498 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ²πππ_ππππππππβ (@kami_zaripova), 139 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kami_zaripova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.