Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kamal Privacy

Channel

Kamal Privacy

@kamalprivacy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

226subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002470568400
TypeChannel
Username@kamalprivacy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kamalprivacy

Growth

225226225.56 August 2026 — 225 subscribers7 August 2026 — 225 subscribers13 August 2026 — 226 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 225–226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:35226+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:02225no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:46225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.6%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total611
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5936.0%
3923.8%
👍2817.1%
❤‍🔥1911.6%
😨74.27%
👏31.83%
🙏31.83%
🤯21.22%
🆒10.61%
👀10.61%
😭10.61%
🤩10.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamalprivacy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی صحبت از حریم شخصی میشه، نام DuckDuckGo 🦆 معمولا به چشم میاد. خدماتی که ارائه میده: ◀ موتور جست‌و‌جو و برای سرچ، جایگزین گوگل: duckduckgo.com 🔎🌐 ◀ هوش مصنوعی با حریم شخصی بالا و بدون جمع‌آوری اطلاعات برای آموزش مدل: duck.ai 🤖🔒 ◀ برنامه و مرورگر اندروید برای مسدودسازی دنبال‌کننده‌های فعالیت شما که در برنامه‌ها هستن (ببینید) 📱🚫 ◀ فورواردکننده ایمیل: به جای اینکه آدرس ایمیل اصلیتون رو بدین به جاهای مختلف، یه ایمیل

🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هر زبونی (مثل انگلیسی) 🗣، یه سری اضافات یا redundancy داره. یعنی چی؟ یعنی یعنی مثلا اگر حرف q داشته باشیم، احتمال اینکه حرف بعدی u باشه خیلی زیاده. چون اکثر کلماتی که q دارن، حرف بعدیشون u هست*: technique, frequency, queen, question, quiet, quality, request, quarter یعنی میشه موقع انتقال اطلاعات از u بدون کاهش معنا صرف‌نظر کرد چون توی این حالات معنای خاصی نمیده و تا q رو ببینیم، خودمون میدونیم که بعدیش u هست.[1]

🔥5❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC167 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حالا آیا قوانینی وجود داره که بتونه از ما در برابر این چیزها دفاع کنه؟🤔 بله. همینکه شما وارد سایتا میشین و ازتون میپرسه چه کوکی‌هایی رو اکسپت می‌کنین، ناشی از این حقوق هست. بیشتر درباره مباحث حقوقی می‌تونین از این مطلب بخونین 📖

🔥2🆒1

26 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC257 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

حالا این کوکی چطور می‌تونه به نقض حریم شخصی کمک کنه؟🌝

🔥6❤‍🔥3

28 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC351 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌐🧭 چجور صفحه‌هایی که تو مرورگر (مثل فایرفاکس) می‌بینیم، بهمون نمایش داده میشن؟ وقتی شما آدرس یه سایت رو توی نوار بالای مرورگر وارد می‌کنین، مثلاً: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariobarzanes_of_Persis یعنی به مرورگر می‌گین: «برو از سرور ویکی‌پدیا، توی مسیر* «wiki» برام چیزای مربوط به آریوبرزن رو بیار». 🧠 مشکل پروتکلی که ما باهاش این درخواست‌ها رو می‌فرستیم (یعنی HTTP) اینه که بی‌حافظه یا اصطلاحاً Stateless هست؛ یعن

5🔥2

23 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC305 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

if ((( options == __WCLONE ) || (options == __WALL)) && ( currUid = 0)) retval = -EINVAL ; - خب مشکل کجاس؟ + توی if اگر نگاه کنیم، به جای == اشتباهی = گذاشته! اما خب این چه مشکلی ممکنه به وجود بیاره؟! بیایم برگردیم به سال ۲۰۰۳. زمانی که کد اصلی و برنچ اصلی لینوکس توی دوجا وجود داشت. هردو با هم سینک بودن ولی. هر کد که قراره تایید بشه و وارد کرنل بشه، یه کد بهش اختصاص میدادن و یه متن که فلانی اینو تایید کرده. اما

5👏2

18 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC299 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔐 چه زمانی سیکرت چت تلگرام /واتسپ/ سیگنال، واقعا امنن؟ شما باید برید توی چت سیکرتی که می‌خواین، بعدش روی پروفایل فرد کلیک کنین و بعد برید داخل Encryption Key، یه کدی رو می‌بینین. باید این کد عینا با کد توی گوشی دوستتون (اون رو پروفایل شما بزنه و بعد همین کد رو نگاه کنه) یکی باشه. 🌝 یا حضوری چک کنین یا با برنامه و اینترنت دیگه‌ای این کدها رو با هم به اشتراک بگذارین و ببینین آیا یکی هستن؟ ❓اما این کدها چی هستن؟ این

👍5👀1🔥1

14 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC359 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دو نکته مهم باقی میمونه: 1⃣🧂 همونطور که در کامنت پست قبل یکی از دوستان اشاره کردن، یکی از راهکارهای یافتن پسورد کاربران بعد از دزدیده‌شدن دیتابیس این هست که بیایم پسوردهای مختلف و رایج رو هی هش کنیم و هی خروجی رو با دیتابیس مقایسه کنیم. (بروت‌فورس) هر وقت یکی شد، پسورد کاربر رو پیدا کردیم. 🍃 اتفاقا فایل‌های بزرگی از هش پسوردهای رایج تو اینترنت آدما گذاشتن که میشه ازشون استفاده کرد برای این کار.🌝 برای جلوگیری از ای

👍6🤩1

11 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC361 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌵 هش یه کاربرد دیگه‌ای داره: ذخیره پسورد! ما اگر پسوردای آدما رو عادی تو فایل ذخیره کنیم، اگر فایل از سیستما/سرورا دزدیده شه خب تبریک :) پسورد همه لو رفت😄 اما هش‌های cryptographic مورد نظر ما، دو ویژگی زیر رو دارن: ۱. هش برگشت‌ناپذیره؛ یعنی اگر هش یک فایل/متن رو به شما بدم، شما هیچ‌جوره نمی‌تونید خود فایل/متن رو بسازین. ۲. هیچ دو متن/باینری/فایلی هش یکسان ندارن. ما می‌تونیم هنگام ثبت‌نام، از پسورد کاربر هش بگیریم

5👍3🤯1

9 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC305 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

تا حالا شده بخواین چک کنین دوتا فایل عینا یکی هستن یا خیر؟ خب ما نمی‌تونیم بریم بیت به بیت فایلو بخونیم که😄 به جاش ما میایم با اجرای یه الگوریتم خاص، یه کد خاصی از فایل به دست میاریم به نام هش؛ یه چیزی مثل یافتن اثرانگشت براش. اینطوری صرفا کد اثرانگشتا (که بهشون میگیم هَش) رو مقایسه کنیم، می‌تونیم مطمئن شیم فایلا یکی هستن یا نه. این الگوریتم خاص جوری طراحی شده که اگر یه نقطه هم از فایل کم یا زیاد شه، اثرانگشت فرق

8👍7🔥2❤‍🔥1

6 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC370 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

آدما میگن بلاکچین دیگه end همه چیزه و هرچیزی رو میتونه ۱۰۰ درصد بی‌مشکل حل کنه. اما Bruce Schneier (یکی از بزرگ‌ترین‌نام‌ها در حوزه امنیت) میگه [1]: What blockchain does is shift some of the trust in people and institutions to trust in technology. You need to trust the cryptography, the protocols, the software, the computers and the network. And you need to trust them absolutely, because they’re often single points

5🤯1😭1

4 Jun 2026, 16:02 UTC317 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#کاربردی 🔒 گاهی نیازه از امن‌بودن یه فایل/لینک مطمئن شیم. یه سایتی هست به نام "Virus Total" که با ۷۰ تا آنتی‌ویروس اسکن می‌کنه. (گوگل خریدتش) ملاحضات: ۱. نباید فایل شخصی رو بفرستیم چون فایلا برای تحلیل به ده‌ها شرکت مختلف ارسال میشن و اونجا ممکنه ذخیره شن (خودش هم تو سایتش نوشته) ۲. اگر یه وقت تشخیص داد safe (امن) هست، لزوما و صد درصد به معنای بی‌اشکال بودن نیست! چون هیچوقت این وبسایت جای آنتی ویروس رو نمیگیره و خب

🔥10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kamalprivacy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,833 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kamal Privacy” (@kamalprivacy), 226 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamalprivacy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.