Channel
@kaluga_i_kaluzhane
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001346292227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaluga_i_kaluzhane |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaluga_i_kaluzhane |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 214 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 216 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 218 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 218 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
79 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 32.9% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 21.5% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 10.1% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 6.33% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 27 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как думаете, изменится ли Калуга в лучшую сторону с появлением главного садовника?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1😁1
С новым садовником, калужане!
👍1😁1
Добро пожаловать в команду! Принял решение назначить на должность главного садовника Калуги Ольгу Сергеевну Зорякову. Она закончила Академию минпросвещения России по направлению «ландшафтное искусство и садовый дизайн» и наш Калужский университет имени Циолковского – институт естествознания. У Ольги Сергеевны большой профессиональный опыт, за спиной – работа в Торгово-промышленной палате области, ведение крупных …
🤔4👍1👎1
Есть и такие интересные мнения. Что думаете об этом? 👇👇👇
Было бы здорово оставить ул. Театральную без деревьев. Они там не задумывались изначально и скрывают архитектуру рубежа XIX-XX в. Кадкам бой!
🤔2
В ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ ТЕМЫ "КАДОЧНОГО" ОЗЕЛЕНЕНИЯ УЛИЦЫ ТЕАТРАЛЬНОЙ. На нынешней неделе состоялось заседание городской Думы, на котором с подачи депутата Якова Казацкого обсуждался в том числе этот вопрос. Далее приводим пост Якова с его страницы в ВК. Вот ссылка на эту публикацию. Под ней любопытная дискуссия идет :) "На прошедшей думе не мог не поднять вопрос про идею кадочного озеленения Театральной улицы. Логику город…
🤔3😁1
Как вам идея «кадочного» озеленения улицы Театральной?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔4❤1
НА ТЕАТРАЛКЕ ПОСТАВЯТ КАДКИ, ИЛИ ОЗЕЛЕНЕНИЕ ПО-КАЛУЖСКИ «Весной взамен спиленных деревьев мы обязательно посадим новые!» — обещали чиновники горуправы минувшей осенью. «Не верим!» — цитировали калужане в ответ Станиславского. И, кажется, были правы. Напомним, в сентябре-октябре прошлого года в Калуге разразился скандал, связанный с внезапно начавшейся массовой вырубкой деревьев. Буквально за одну-две недели зеленых…
😢6🤔3👍2🤯2👎1
Мне за свою жизнь приходилось стоять в разных очередях: в театрах, музеях, кино, поликлиниках, магазинах… Но вот в очереди к финишу соревнований я оказалась впервые. 1-го января поучаствовала в Новогоднем забеге. В первый раз была на нем пару лет назад — в качестве группы поддержки младшей дочери. Мне тогда, в целом, все понравилось, и я решила, что когда-нибудь приду на забег не только как зритель, но и как участни…
👍10🔥3🤯3❤2😢1
Печально то, что этот список горуправа опубликовала на своем сайте еще летом, но никому об этом не сообщила. СМИ обнаружили этот реестр только недавно.
👍3🤡1😢1
❗️Не самая позитивная новость, но, по крайней мере, теперь вы сможете узнать адрес ближайшего к дому/месту работы, учебы укрытия.
❤2
❕ Список укрытий в Калуге на случай воздушной тревоги При ЧС в качестве укрытий будут использоваться подвалы жилых домов и другие подземные сооружения, в том числе парковки. Всего таких мест — больше тысячи. Полный список адресов можно найти на сайте Горуправы. 🤖 Прислать новость 📺 Заказать рекламу
👍2❤1🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kaluga_i_kaluzhane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, изменится ли Калуга в лучшую сторону с появлением главного садовника?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вам идея «кадочного» озеленения улицы Театральной?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 27 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Калуга и калужане” (@kaluga_i_kaluzhane), 214 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaluga_i_kaluzhane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.