Votes are up ✨ Which vault/pool are you voting for? 👀 Your $KALM, your decision. 🗳 Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1761091799668388311
🔥14👍6💩3🙏1

Channel
@kalmar_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
392subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001285916626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kalmar_ann |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kalmar_ann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 392 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 392 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
284 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 187 | 65.8% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 10.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.76% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 1.76% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.76% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 1.41% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 1.41% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.352% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2023 to 23 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Votes are up ✨ Which vault/pool are you voting for? 👀 Your $KALM, your decision. 🗳 Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1761091799668388311
🔥14👍6💩3🙏1
Votes are up ✨ New voting option: $ORDS has been added to DeFi wars, with the new staking pool to be added Monday! Your $KALM, your decision. 🗳 Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1758868988757467139
❤11👍2
Votes are up ✨ Use your $KALM tokens to decide which vaults/pools get the most rewards for the upcoming week. Your $KALM, your decision. 🗳 Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1755520789527384216
🔥4❤1
Votes are up ✨ New changes: • Starting Monday, $BSSB will also have an ERC-20 vault. The BNB Chain vault will not be removed, instead, both options will have their respective voting options. Your KALM, your decision. 🗳 Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1753767476523896899
🔥13❤3
Vaults Update 👷 Starting Monday, February 5th, our $BSSB pool will be moved from BNB Chain to Ethereum, in response to the feedback received from the community. Stay tuned for today's votes if you're looking to stake ERC-20 $BSSB on Kalmy! 🦑 https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1753032646303572403
🔥7
🗳 Weekly votes are over and here are the results: #DeFi Wars Top 3: 1. $BSSB ~ 13.31% 2. $KALM - $ETH ~ 11.68% 3. $MEME ~ 11.5% #NFT Wars Top 3: 1. Kalmy PFP ~ 21.86% 2. @saint_myd ~ 20.1% 3. @RTFKT's Clonex ~17.02% 🦑 Stake on kalmy.app! https://twitter.com/KalmyAPP/status/1752056888361914509
🔥8
Votes are up ✨ New vaults voting options: • $ORDI • $SATS • $BSSB You KALM, your decision. 🗳️ Vote now ↓ https://twitter.com/kalmyapp/status/1750975704840421843?s=46&t=ih312t9wQTYDet8PUFPmLw
🔥18🤝3🥰3
Andddd we woke up lol That took a bit but next Monday we have BRC20 tokens in Kalmy Wars 🪄✨ Stake ORDI, SATS, or BitStable. And plz share 🥹 https://x.com/KalmyAPP/status/1749865756072804485?s=20
🔥17🎉5👏5
ordinals/inscriptions/all the new bitcoin eco we spent weeks of silent research so plz spread it if u believed in us and didnt jeet the holy kalm urs, Mark and Kalmari https://x.com/KalmyAPP/status/1747700421127528910?s=20
🔥20❤8👍6
hi https://x.com/kalmyapp/status/1743907786294284437?s=46&t=JeyieXfDM0XpmT5lrUrUug
🔥12
New votes are live with 2 new SquadSwap farms on vote.kalmy.app 🌞 More updates on the way.
🔥7👍1💩1
• Less than 24 hours left to vote on vote.kalmy.app 👈 • KalmySwap routing of SquadSwap is now tested and supported 🐇
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kalmar_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,247,109 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kalmar_ann named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KALM Announcements” (@kalmar_ann), 392 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalmar_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.