Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Иван Калгин

@kalgini

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001723860554
TypeChannel
Username@kalgini
DescriptionО частной юридической практике, полезной информации и немного о разном. Для связи t.me/caesarxviii
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kalgini

Growth

1527 Aug 2026, 14:36 — 152 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 152 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:368 Aug 2026, 19:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:17152no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:36152first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (16 December 202527 July 2026)
Views total220
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
23
Links
64

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 53s
Average length
2m 18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5341.4%
🔥3829.7%
3426.6%
10.781%
👌10.781%
💯10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kalgini. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подстели соломку Как понимаете, риски наступления ущерба для бизнеса (да и для обычных граждан тоже) только возрастают, именно поэтому каждый предприниматель обязан просчитывать риски утраты имущества, в результате атаки беспилотников, терактов, диверсий. Статья 964 Гражданского кодекса РФ устанавливает основания для освобождения страховщика от выплаты страховки. Между воздействием ядерного взрыва и гражданской вой

👍3🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC143 views14 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ситуация с пожарами на складах Вайлдберрис в результате атаки БПЛА подсветила одну большую юридическую проблему для продавцов, которую сейчас широко обсуждают в Сети. По результатам обсуждения в Диком консалтинге, подготовил инструкцию для продавцов с WB. Многие слышали, что незадолго до инцидента Вайлдберриз обновил оферту, добавив пункт 11.3.4.1, который прямо относит падение беспилотников к форс-мажору, освобожд

👍10🔥31

27 Mar 2026, 16:48 UTC262 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каждый имеет право на тайну переписки, телефонных переговоров, почтовых, телеграфных и иных сообщений, гласит статья в Конституции РФ, а потому важно просвещаться для возможности сохранения как тайны, так и свободного выбора! Так что проходите по ссылке и не забывайте просвещать других!

3👍2

2 Mar 2026, 10:13 UTC302 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Свой устав в чужом доме: новые правила русского языка для бизнеса С 1 марта 2026 года вступили в силу поправки в закон «О защите прав потребителей», которые устанавливают жесткий приоритет русского языка в любой информации для покупателей. Что именно попадает под регулирование Закон касается всей информации, которая не является рекламой, но предназначена для публичного ознакомления. Это вывески, указатели, информац

👍3🔥2👌1

2 Mar 2026, 07:41 UTC230 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ранее писал о порядке действий, для получения компенсации после атаки беспилотников. Возможно кому-то будет актуально, после массированной ночной атаки.

5

19 Feb 2026, 08:11 UTC275 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В гостях хорошо, а дома лучше. Пусть я так и не побывал на Сейшельских островах ещё в марте 2022 (из-за войны рейс несколько раз переносили, а потом и вовсе отменили), но зато получилось взыскать хорошую компенсацию за отмененную поездку, при этом мы от поездки не отказались, что позволило возместить нам стоимость круиза. Забавно, что ещё раньше мне удалось получить компенсацию в пользу своих доверителей по аналоги

👍11

9 Feb 2026, 15:18 UTC258 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Аудиозапись последнего судебного заседания в первой инстанции, проходило все в режиме говорения, что называется не по бумажке, хотя уточнение к иску было на 16 страниц 🤏 с максимально подробным описанием. Всегда важно донести свою позицию до суда ёмко и по делу, обобщив все то, что обсуждалось в куче судебных заседаний. Если что, запись можно ускорить. Обновление: Для скачивания файла необходимо включить ВПН. На 10

👍2

7 Feb 2026, 10:15 UTC269 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Интересно ли бы вам услышать аудиозапись финального судебного заседания по затопленной яхте?

  1. да95%
  2. нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Feb 2026, 10:07 UTC199 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Скупой платит дважды или кто заплатит за затопление яхты. В спорах часто пишут о красивом финале, но за кадром остается огромная работа, которая больше напоминает бег с препятствиями, чем судебное разбирательство. На днях мы завершили дело о затоплении яхты Caroline. Росгосстрах отказал в выплате, ссылаясь на грубую неосторожность капитана. Мы не просто доказали их неправоту, но и увеличили сумму взыскания с 6 до

8👍8

7 Feb 2026, 10:07 UTC269 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чтобы развалить доводы оппонентов, я еще глубже погрузился в яхтенную специфику и это несмотря на наличие у меня удостоверения шкипера IYT и права управления как раз такими парусными лодками до 24 метров длиной. Также пришлось погрузится в изучение лоции Черного моря, разбираться физике катабатических (нисходящих) ветров общаясь с метеорологами и яхтсменами, а также в устройстве системы охлаждения двигателя, правиль

12🔥8👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kalgini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Feb 2026, 10:15 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Интересно ли бы вам услышать аудиозапись финального судебного заседания по затопленной яхте?

  1. да95%
  2. нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иван Калгин” (@kalgini), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalgini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.