Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐊𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗁𝗄𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 [ 🖥🫆 ]

@kalebloshkicf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

271subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002769441431
TypeChannel
Username@kalebloshkicf
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kalebloshkicf

Growth

271272271.59 Aug 2026, 18:47 — 272 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:03 — 271 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:4710 Aug 2026, 09:03
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 271–272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:03271-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:47272first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.1%
avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (12 April 20269 August 2026)
Views total836
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

287 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19567.9%
💘4315.0%
❤‍🔥3913.6%
🍓51.74%
custom 536386283352204421310.348%
custom 536413253599339961310.348%
custom 536618190540848841810.348%
custom 536626594932853639010.348%
💋10.348%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC27 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ангстовый сборник драбблов по Калеблошкам в честь ТРОП(ink): Авгрусть 🌱 Лололошка покидает Алотерру. Но дома его по прежнему ждет любимый человек, покорно ожидающий возвращения. Но проходит месяц, за ним еще один, и еще. Никто не успевает оглянуться, как уже долгие годы разлуки тянутся за собой. А Калеб все еще ждет. Потому что искренне верит Фб: https://ficbook.net/readfic/019fe354-58ac-7204-a6d7-e4c98257554a Тгк:

4custom 53638628335220442131custom 53641325359933996131custom 53661819054084884181custom 53662659493285363901

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

8 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC59 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Внезапная и первая моя коллаба с прекрасным художником Шень!💋 Калеб - Сюр Лололошка - Шень ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

8❤‍🔥1

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

4 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC101 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Скучно однако в больнице лежать, зато любимые гром и гроза Тгк ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

11❤‍🔥2🍓1

Signed 𝑚𝒶𝑡ℯ𝑚𝒶𝑡𝒾𝓀𝒶

24 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC161 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Аватарки можно кидать?... Мой тгк Тгк автора артов ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

12💘1

Signed 𝗻𝗶𝗿𝗮 𝗮𝗺

20 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC187 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Чота как то скетчу, хихикаю Неанон Филечка ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

12❤‍🔥4💘2

Signed 𝗻𝗶𝗿𝗮 𝗮𝗺

20 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC148 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

💘5

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

20 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC153 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Дитё Калеба и Лошика❤️ Рейн Уильям Хёрзли. 32 года. Рейн рос с одним родителем, Калебом. Так как Лололошка ушёл ещё когда Рейну было меньше года. По рассказу отца, второй отец не хотел уходить из семьи. Но кто ему поверит? Вот и маленький Рейн не поверил. Рейн чаще всего был в гостях у тёть, Кейт и Хейли, потому что Калеб очень много работал не дома и у него не было много времени на сына, но иногда оно всё же появля

10💘3

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

29 Jun 2026, 21:39 UTC210 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кормлю сегодня. Можно я теперь всегда буду только чибиков рисовать?... И почему я постоянно забываю рисовать лоху очки🫪 Автор ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

26❤‍🔥3💘2

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

29 Jun 2026, 18:26 UTC197 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, можете буллить меня за такое, потому что я принимаю любую критику😇 ! Моё мнение ! Автор ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

10💘2❤‍🔥1

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

16 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC248 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Спустя долгое время я смогла что-то нарисовать, мне было трудно раньше что-то придумать. За меньше суток по времени я смогла быстренько что-то сделать У Ло и Калеба крио глаза бога. Тгк-https://t.me/raskraschen ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

❤‍🔥17💘32

Signed ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇᴄᴀᴋᴇ 💮 #ENTP

28 May 2026, 06:00 UTC299 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

крутые калеблошки от @okeewooArt ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

22❤‍🔥3💘2

Signed 𝑚𝒶𝑡ℯ𝑚𝒶𝑡𝒾𝓀𝒶 💤

21 May 2026, 10:15 UTC302 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

cr SweetBee14 ( #take ) • @kalebloshkiteiki_bot

15🍓2💘1

Signed 𝑚𝒶𝑡ℯ𝑚𝒶𝑡𝒾𝓀𝒶 💤

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kalebloshkicf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,094,179 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐊𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗁𝗄𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 [ 🖥🫆 ]” (@kalebloshkicf), 271 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalebloshkicf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.