Channel
@kakzarabotatvinternetax
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
582subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001320868770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kakzarabotatvinternetax |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kakzarabotatvinternetax |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 582 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 584 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 586 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 589 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 591 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 594 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 595 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 595 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 47.3% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 25.5% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 27 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как я чуть не ректанулся Сегодня был листинг Blum — тапалка в тоне, про которую, думаю, многие слышали. — Сео посадили в тюрьму — Объемов на платформе нет — Тапалки все мертвы В общем, все факторы говорили за то, чтобы шортить эту шляпу. Что я, собственно и сделал. Открыл на мекс шорт по 0,096 И потом дали гейт. Там цена была 0,075 в момент открытия. Я не встал в спред, потому что у Мекса лимиты 100$. И я поду…
👍7🌚4
Вот такой штукой еще занимаюсь. С 6-ого июня +300$ Я вообще не трейдер. И я не шарю в тех анализе и прочей трейдерской приблуде. Тут сделки на листингах, то есть когда проект только выходит на биржи. И под какие-то события, которые могут повлиять на цену ( не новостные, а по токеномике). Как видите, в основном — шорты. То есть отбираются проекты, которые гипотетически могут укататься по ряду факторов. Я сам пока…
👍3
Люди готовы платить деньги, чтобы купить стикеры. Которые ничего не дают) Совсем кукухой поехали. Так ещё и разбирают их меньше, чем за 30 секунд. Ну а я чё, раз всем надо, то и мне тоже 😁 75$ отдал, норм?)
😁4
Пытаюсь дальше))))
👍4😁1
Декабрь 2024: Банк 11к$ Доллар по 110 То есть почти 1,2 млн Апрель 2025: Банк 2к$ Доллар по 86 рублей То есть 170 тыс. 🫡🫡🫡 🫨🫨🫨
🤯5😁2🤔1
Пу пу пу
🌚3
По классике Откупаю jup на спот Цель: 15% забрать
👍1
Ладно, я снова в плюсе +8$ Богатеем
👍1
Продал монеты, которые пришли с премаркета. Фиксирую минус 119$ Не стал холдить в надежде на то, что отрастёт. В проект не верю. К тому же через 2 недели снова разлок будет. Минус так минус. Выводы из этой истории: 1) Соблюдать риск-менеджмент на сделках. На этой сделке я чутка вышел за лимиты. В рамках всего депозита — копейки. Но в рамках моего "флип портфеля" надо было брать меньше. 2) Следить за нарративом рын…
👍1
Зафиксирую себе как напоминание: Если проект на ТОНе — обходи его стороной.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2
Ясно, рект
🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kakzarabotatvinternetax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пытаюсь Разобраться в Крипте” (@kakzarabotatvinternetax), 582 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kakzarabotatvinternetax.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.