Channel
@kakoetonazvaniessilki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002850245091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kakoetonazvaniessilki |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kakoetonazvaniessilki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 104 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 103 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 102 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 101 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 100 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 100 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
218 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 51.8% | |
| custom 5433839833732628218 | 22 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5386633139512690552 | 20 | 9.17% | |
| custom 5235627926245877158 | 19 | 8.72% | |
| custom 5249230620248258089 | 16 | 7.34% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 4.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 3.21% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 3.21% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| custom 5248962773202777801 | 2 | 0.917% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера с любимыми друзьями устроили съемки для моего режиссерского портфолио Было круто! Я впервые была в роли фотографа (Сёма, я уважаю и восхищаюсь вашей профессией, это жесть) А потом мы 2 с половиной часа искали мой телефон в траве вместе с крутым дядечкой с собачкой🥹 Как вы поняли, нашли)
custom 53866331395126905529❤6custom 52356279262458771584custom 52492306202482580891
Сегодня мне 20
❤17custom 53866331395126905528🙏5💔1custom 52356279262458771581
«Все в кино через постель попадают, а ты через бумажные самолетики» Решила помочь коллеге перед тимбилдингом научится делать бумажные самолетики, а он оказался кастинг-директором Добро порождает добро
❤18❤🔥7🙏4custom 53866331395126905523custom 52356279262458771582
Channel photo updated
Рутина) Святые люди, у кого хватает терпения заниматься монтажом 🙏🏼 У кого мощный комп, который тянет да винчи, можно переехать на сутки к вам? Я люблю мыть посуду, могу спать на ковре😩
❤12custom 52356279262458771583💋2💔2
Фото на паспорт готово! Photo by @onefoxday
❤9💋5custom 52492306202482580892
Ну и конечно, не удержалась, и предложила ему сниппет забабахать. Он лайкнул)) А его барабанщик предложил мне заниматься у него…. Шок! Мир слышит❤️
❤11custom 52492306202482580894custom 54338398337326282184
Была на концерте чудесного Трофима Гранна! Огромная любящая душа в этом человеке ❣️
❤7
это мы!🤍
❤7
Если кому-то показать мои режиссерские пометки, меня сразу же упекут в дурку☀️ Я вам доверяю..
custom 52492306202482580899❤3
Написать свою биографию в стиле стендапа?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Вопрос максимально серьезный:
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kakoetonazvaniessilki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Написать свою биографию в стиле стендапа?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“К-КОРАБЕЛЬНИКОВА” (@kakoetonazvaniessilki), 104 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kakoetonazvaniessilki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.