Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Karina Ogannisyan

Channel

Karina Ogannisyan

@kakarina11

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,745subscribers

-631 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596332592
TypeChannel
Username@kakarina11
DescriptionСотрудничество: @v7gen подписывайтесь на мои остальные соц.сети: YOUTUBE - https://youtube.com/@ka.karina1?si=9mr RUTUBE - https://rutube.ru/channel/12399143/ VK - https://m.vk.com/club230747008 РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6970cd544ee6d2cd8bcd2026
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kakarina11

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,74524,39724,07129 August 2026 — 24,376 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,397 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,350 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,331 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,314 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,274 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,276 subscribers6 September 2026 — 24,270 subscribers9 September 2026 — 24,219 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,199 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,190 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,133 subscribers17 September 2026 — 24,089 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,853 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,868 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,782 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,209 subscribers14 October 2026 — 24,146 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,128 subscribers16 October 2026 — 24,115 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,100 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,093 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,084 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,071 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,019 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,996 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,979 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,964 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,926 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,912 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,885 subscribers28 October 2026 — 23,868 subscribers29 October 2026 — 23,832 subscribers30 October 2026 — 23,806 subscribers31 October 2026 — 23,776 subscribers1 November 2026 — 23,762 subscribers2 November 2026 — 23,745 subscribers29 August 20262 November 2026
37 measurements spanning 66 days, net -631. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,647–24,495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 21:4923,745-17
1 Nov 2026, 19:4823,762-14
31 Oct 2026, 19:5623,776-30
30 Oct 2026, 19:1123,806-26
29 Oct 2026, 17:5623,832-36
28 Oct 2026, 19:4923,868-17
27 Oct 2026, 20:1923,885-27
26 Oct 2026, 22:1623,912-14
26 Oct 2026, 00:3123,926-38
25 Oct 2026, 03:3023,964-15
24 Oct 2026, 00:1623,979-17
22 Oct 2026, 23:2023,996-23
21 Oct 2026, 18:3724,019-52
20 Oct 2026, 13:2024,071-13
19 Oct 2026, 12:5624,084-9
18 Oct 2026, 12:3024,093-7
17 Oct 2026, 15:4724,100-15
16 Oct 2026, 16:4524,115-13
15 Oct 2026, 15:1924,128-18
14 Oct 2026, 15:0124,146first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 23,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,610
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held60 (27 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total97,580
Reactions total1,158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 01:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈536
Links
≈215

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 17s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,577 reactions across 60 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,577100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.33%
2 of 60 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,370
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,400
over 58 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdA7ZaL119 October 202619 October 2026
2W5zFJAQbZs113 October 202613 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,370 views28 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

прочитала и как-то больно стало… ведь это картина из жизни некоторых людей(

❤28

1 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC≈2,360 views29 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

недавно на новоселье решили подарить такой аппарат для газации напитков от Bork🧑🏽‍🩰 газирует абсолютно все, что туда зальешь: воду, вино, соки😅 и теперь интересно понять насколько это вкусно😅 консультант сказал, что вкусно и удобно ) кто пробовал?)✨

❤29

30 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈2,910 views12 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Традиционная подборка от бренда NUME на Lamoda🧑🏽‍🩰 я просто обожаю этот бренд!!! самые трендовые, доступные в цене и правда качественные изделия у них - присмотритесь, если не были знакомы💔 Поло Кардиган Джинсы Платье Платье Блуза Жилет Кардиган Бюстгальтер Ботфорты обязательно загляните в комментарий✨

❤12

27 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTC≈1,840 views23 reactionsread 28 October 2026

как жаль смотреть, что нашим же брендам буквально нужно «выживать» в нынешних условиях рынка и многие в последнее время уже не вытягивают💔

❤23

27 Oct 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,890 views15 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Forwarded from @MariStyleee

Как жаль что бренды закрываются, очень жаль 💔 Сегодня Sorelle era объявили о прекращении работы.

❤15

25 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC≈2,950 views30 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

были на презентации нового раскладного iPhone Duo📱 оооочень прикольно, оооочень необычно! я прям залипала на нем!)) и в какой-то момент даже подумала, что хочу его себе взять… но потом поняла, что это было бы больше похоже на импульсивную покупку ради новой приколюшки, не более😅 потому что я почти уверена, что первое время пользоваться им будет не так удобно, как кажется. приложения ещё нужно адаптировать под нов…

❤30

21 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC≈3,510 views56 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤56

21 Oct 2026, 08:03 UTC≈3,720 views98 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

рандом с моими смешариками 💛

❤98

20 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,590 views88 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

мои смешарики гостили у бабули, пока мама приехала из Питера 🙂‍↔️ очень ценю свою свекровь за то, что она всегда готова быть рядом и помогать 24/7, независимо от своего состояния и обстоятельств)) и моя бабушка точно такая же 🤍 благодаря им мы с Вигеном можем спокойно заниматься своими делами и работой, зная, что наши мальчики окружены любовью и заботой) девочки, а у вас есть такая поддержка от родителей? эту по…

❤88

19 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC≈3,270 views65 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

поделитесь, за чьими блогами из нашей компании вы еще наблюдаете, помимо моего?)

❤65

19 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC≈3,370 views23 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdA7ZaLPhoto

Я как сумашедший бьютик не смогла не протестить новинки, от @vivienne_sabo !!💔 Fantastique, Excentrique и Grotesque - это не просто туши, это три настроения… и здесь нет случайных форм каждая тушь - как характер зеленая Fantastique (артикул D215222390) силиконовая щеточка, выразительный взгляд, объемные реснички фиолетовая Excentrique (артикул D215222380) красивый изгиб и термоформула синяя Grotesque (артикул D…

❤23

16 Oct 2026, 14:34 UTC≈3,290 views36 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤36

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @kakarina11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

terezaagr
@teegrr · 6,382
#1
M.
@mariann0chkaaa · 16,687
#2
Sanika Kadieva
@SK_lifeee · 36,433
#3
mashulkin’s weekdays
@mashulkinsweekday · 9,403
#4
_marychka1_
@marychka0 · 24,766
#5
Anyafik.live🕊
@liveanyafik · 1,690
#6
Karina Kasparyants
@karinaVIP · 166,456
#7
With love D
@dianochka_kess · 3,453
#8
Dàri Àsln
@dariasln · 20,826
#9
Ruzi_Sand
@Ruzi_Sand · 9,799
#10
𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐠 𝐛𝐲 𝐌𝐢
@blogbymi · 15,814
#11
Mari Virabi
@marivirabi · 12,718
#12
YANA MARGARYAN
@yanamargaryan · 23,399
#13
TatiLIFE
@tatiLIFE1616 · 50,253
#14
L🤍
@lizallllllllllllllllllll1 · 23,280
#15
evayo
@ilahayoo · 14,114
#16
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 632,096
#17
𝐐𝐨 𝐀𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐬
@avakyanqq · 4,523
#18
говорит и показывает Шуанет 🐚
@shunya_akhm · 67,648
#19
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 102,106
#20
mirgal
@mirggal · 3,539
#21
Sabrina’s world
@chikarel13 · 306
#22
ine.ssa
@inessam1707 · 807
#23
from A
@lyubovnikogdaneperrestaet · 5,504
#24
dr nicole 🪷
@doctogram · 4,917
#25
Ali🦋Yal
@AlinaYalanuzyan · 62,043
#26
алло, Áля?🤪
@aloalyaaa · 1,317
#27
шашлычный мир
@arustannaa · 12,615
#28
FARLIN
@farlin28 · 8,018
#29
goar.a
@goaraaaa · 5,353
#30
Nelifer Nelifer ⚡️💗
@nelifernelifer · 26,142
#31
SÍ
@sussssZ · 870
#32
TATEV event🕊️
@TATEV_event · 1,205
#33
beginiani
@beginiani · 16,134
#34
Pushman
@pushmanjulia · 178,758
#35
ᴇʟʏᴀ
@eelleeoonnoorraa · 985
#36
MELTON
@meltonsofya · 62,626
#37
𝐋𝐕𝐌
@wwLVM · 1,398
#38
Tataphoto
@tataphoto06 · 632 (as read 16 September 2026)
#39

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Safronovakristinaofficial
@safronovakristinaofficiall · 52,825
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 29 August 2026
_marychka1_
@marychka0 · 24,766
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 September 2026
Mi 💌
@milenapetrosyan1111 · 91,498
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 31 August 2026
YANA MARGARYAN
@yanamargaryan · 23,399
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 17 September 2026
Nelifer Nelifer ⚡️💗
@nelifernelifer · 26,142
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 September 2026
Гурам Амарян
@guramamaryan · 28,982
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
INFO24
@info24am · 24,791
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Karina Ogannisyan” (@kakarina11), 23,745 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kakarina11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.