Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kaize

@kaizedev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

950subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002569952772
TypeChannel
Username@kaizedev
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaizedev

Growth

9409509456 Aug 2026, 09:18 — 940 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:51 — 940 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:38 — 950 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:187 Aug 2026, 06:38
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 939–952 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:38950+10
6 Aug 2026, 13:51940no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:18940first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.5%
avg views ÷ 950 subscribers
Avg views / post
727
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (25 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,359
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8446.4%
🔥4022.1%
🤯168.84%
😁158.29%
🎉94.97%
🐳73.87%
🥰42.21%
💯21.10%
😍21.10%
🏆10.552%
🤩10.552%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC349 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

РЕАКТЫ ДЛЯ КОГО ВКЛЮЧИЛ😶

😁14🔥64💯2

Signed kaize

5 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC357 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Фри подписки на АИ - то, что нужно всем Забайтил? Спешу тебя огорчить, это не очередной пост, как у всех со списком free сервисов. Если же тебя все-таки такое интересует, то рекомендую посмотреть мой сайт, где я время от времени добавляю новые методы freellm.sh Маркетинг 💸 Сервисы, которые предлагают ограниченный доступ к популярным ИИ, часто делают это с одной целью - привлечь пользователей, кто-то делает это по

18🔥6🎉4🏆1

Signed kaize

5 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC373 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если кто-то заметил я поменял никнейм канала, аву (в народе pfp), а также включил эмоджи (с маленькой надеждой, что их будут ставить) 🥰 А теперь я сел писать пост.

18🎉5🔥3😍2🥰1😁1

Signed kaize

31 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,440 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новая программа для создателей контента. Это не просто очередную амба, которые так любят абузить СНГ аудитория (с недавнего времени и Африканцы), а прям полноценная экосистему вокруг проекта. Именно с такой целью меня пригласили Community Lead в проект Horizon. Что вы получаете? 1. Base salary (4-6 постов в месяц): $150, $300, $500+ в зависимости от твиттера. 2. Leaderboard: ежемесячный розыгрыш $5000, среди созд

1

Signed kaize

27 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC869 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

уххх че готовиться, это доп приз пул к зарплате

Signed kaize

25 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC971 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

прошла волна банов в х - сигнальчик nikita bier опять взялся чистить платформу от тех, кто палевно автоматизирует свою деятельность. под раздачу попали в первую очередь те, кто крутит реплаи через софт - и ладно бы софт был нормальный, но реплаи (мои посты, как пример) прилетают через секунду даже под лонгриды и выглядят как полнейший мусор. grok сейчас легко идентифицирует такие аккаунты. если всё же кто-то из вас

🤯1

Signed kaize

13 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,070 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Чева ебырь +1 кейс и два на подходе

7🤯7🔥6

Signed kaize

3 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,450 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

CREAO АМБАССАДОРСКАЯ ПРОГРАММА: ОНБОРДИНГ НОВЫХ КОЛЗОВ Кто следит за мной какое-то время, знает что у меня есть АИ амбассадорка (оплата за посты), куда я стараюсь пригласить как можно больше людей, но по итогу мне удалось заинвайтить только одного человека, но суть в том, что перед этим многих людей просто покикали из амбов - они поняли, что африканцы дают слабую аудиторию +слабенький актив поэтому не захотели их де

12🐳5🔥2

Signed kaize

25 Jun 2026, 21:30 UTC≈1,380 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне очень нравится обучать людей, которые приходят в Twitter. Довольно часто мне пишут в личку с вопросами: как развивать аккаунт, какой контент делать, как набирать аудиторию. Я всегда стараюсь помочь и объяснить базовые вещи. Но многие приходят с ожиданием получить готовую инструкцию, после которой контент сразу начнет залетать. В таких случаях я задаю один простой вопрос:Ты хочешь делать $$$ быстро или построить

🔥5

Signed kaize

20 Jun 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,050 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ol_onXdaoPhoto

Делаешь контент про ИИ? Прочти это На самом деле до конца не понимаю, пишут это сами люди или ИИ Потому что настолько жёсткие темы про китайцев или quants.. Я хз можно ли самому в адеквате это найти и расписать Так вот. Писать контент про ИИ можно и нужно. НО Сохраняйте свою индивидуальность Контент про ИИ не пишет ИИ агент. Это делает человек. Нужно как-то поддерживать актив как человек. Чтобы отличаться Просм

3

Signed kaize

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kaizedev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,948 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kaize” (@kaizedev), 950 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaizedev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.