Channel
@kaila_stars
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
396subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001458999716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaila_stars |
| Created | 16 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaila_stars |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 396 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 393 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 389 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 391 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 387 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 387 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 66.9% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.82% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 3.18% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.637% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему в слове woman есть слово man? Я уверена, что каждый, кто хоть немного изучал английский, задавался этим вопросом. И нет — дело не в том, что женщины «произошли от мужчин» 🙃 На самом деле всё гораздо интереснее. Раньше слово man было гендерно-нейтральным и означало просто «человек». Например, «человечество» раньше называли mankind. Сейчас это слово считается устаревающим, и чаще используют humankind. А чт…
❤28
Ребят, вы как, остаётесь тут или в макс идёте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Зачем Вам нужен английский? (неск. вариантов)
The shares total 227%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой у вас уровень английского?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
ПОЧЕМУ ТОЛЬКО УРОКОВ НЕДОСТАТОЧНО? У многих людей уровень английского не растёт годами. Или растёт – но мучительно медленно. Почему так происходит? Главная проблема – отсутствие интеграции языка в жизнь. Одних уроков недостаточно. Да, на уроках вы изучаете грамматику, учитесь говорить правильнее, расширяете словарный запас. Но урок – это всего несколько часов в неделю. Всё остальное время вы живёте без языка. А я…
❤18
WE ARE HAVING A GANG BANG Нормально так эта старушка произвела фурор на кастинге 🤣 Может, просто рассказала про свою прошлую ночь? Давайте разберём эту прекрасную песню. We are having a gang bang Gang bang – групповушка. Обратите внимание на Present Continuous – это значит, что действие происходит не вообще, а прямо сейчас. We are having a ball a ball – бал, но в выражении have a ball означает отлично проводить …
❤10👍1
«Ой, я сейчас сделаю кучу ошибок, скажу что-то неправильно, и другой человек подумает, что я тупица, А ЕЩЁ БУДЕТ РЖАТЬ НАДО МНОЙ» Жиза? Тогда читай дальше, объясню, почему людям сложно говорить на английском. И дело не только в том, что на постсоветском пространстве за ошибки учителя пиздят указкой по рукам. Разговор на иностранном языке можно сравнить с выступлением на сцене 🎤 Всем нам легко петь дома, когда ник…
❤4
Я кинула свой канал на анализ на канал, который прожаривает и, боже, я до слёз смеялась над этим постом 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Передознулась учебниками Бонк ахахха жиза
🔥2
📊 Channel Analysis Results by @ScratchAuthorEgoBot 🎯 Channel: @kaila_stars 🔥 Roast Analysis: Ну что, Кайла, присаживайся, сейчас будем препарировать твой «нескучный английский» без анестезии. Перед нами классический случай «синдрома выпускника МГИМО», который так отчаянно пытается доказать, что он «свой в доску», что вставлять слово «хуй» в каждый второй пост становится для него делом чести. Твоё позиционирование …
❤10👍5❤🔥3
Тут очень сложный мем, так что без меня не обойтись, погнали! #вокэбулари С вас ❤️ To roast – прожарить. Так же, как и у нас прожаривают шутками. Но мясо тоже можно прожарить. Bring up – фразовый глагол. Поднимать (какую-то тему) Custody – опека (над детьми) Battle – битва Coffin – ⚰️ гроб. Именно такой формы. Если гроб прямоугольный, то это будет casket To dare – осмелиться. I dare to say – я осмелюсь сказать. Ту…
🔥9❤1👍1
АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ДЛЯ МАРКЕТОЛОГОВ 🎯 Вы думали, я только про члены шутить умею? Нет, конечно! Немногие знают, но я имею профессиональное образование в сфере маркетинга (MGIMO finished). Английский был моим первым языком, и половина моих пар была по бизнес-английскому и английскому для маркетологов: кейсы, презентации – всё это мы ковыряли годами. Также маркетинг можно назвать одной из сферой моих интересов, так как я, в…
❤3👍1🔥1
ATTENTION, ОБЪЯВЛЯЮ ИНТЕРАКТИВ Ваша задача: написать, что Вы видите на фото, используя как можно больше слов (на английском, естественно). Победитель получит мини-разбор 1 своего вопроса в английском (например, вопросы с артиклями, временами и т.д.) Я начну с первого слова: a girl
❤7🎉1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kaila_stars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребят, вы как, остаётесь тут или в макс идёте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Зачем Вам нужен английский? (неск. вариантов)
The shares total 227%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой у вас уровень английского?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский без цензуры 18+” (@kaila_stars), 396 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaila_stars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.