Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ꮶᴀдᴩ Ꭰня

@kadr_dnua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003795789255
TypeChannel
Username@kadr_dnua
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 19 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kadr_dnua

Growth

2912 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 29 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 02:08 — 29 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:3113 Aug 2026, 02:08
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:0829no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:3129first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎6142.7%
3725.9%
❤‍🔥1611.2%
💋106.99%
🤮64.20%
💩53.50%
🍓42.80%
🔥21.40%
🥰21.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 08:49 UTC125 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 У канала @questfromlena открылась мини-студия Желаем им развития этой идеи🌟

❤‍🔥2💋1

1 Mar 2026, 09:11 UTC148 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧸🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Канал @VelourSecrets_quest переехал в новый ( @the_angel_of_death9 ) Желаем вам в новом канале успеха и развития🌟

💋2

28 Feb 2026, 08:28 UTC165 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сегодня на интервью был канал — @Silver_Wavess 🌟 Как у вас возникла мысль создать канал и сложно было вам развиваться? Вообще на моём первом канале, где я не знала что такое навигация, очень сложно было развиться. Но сейчас мы плавно развиваемся, и это очень хорошо. 🌟 Какой у вас самый популярный и интересный квест в жанре романтика/хоррор? Как по мне самый интересный "матрица" в жанре романтики/мистики

1❤‍🔥1

28 Feb 2026, 08:17 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сегодня на интервью был канал — @questfromlena 🌟 Как у вас возникла мысль создать канал и сложно было вам развиваться? Создавала канал не я. Всё началось с того, что в тт мне попалось видео, про канал по сп, и я решила пройти квест. Но когда перешла в канал, то узнала, что требуются сотрудники, по типу сценаристов и актёров. Я отправила две анкеты, на актёра и сценариста. После, пробыла в канале неделю, и

1❤‍🔥1🍓1💋1

27 Feb 2026, 17:14 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сегодня на интервью был канал — @ordenhornogozatnia 🌟 Как у вас возникла мысль создать канал и сложно было вам развиваться? — Просто захотела создать ещё один канал по страшным перепискам. Развивать канал было не сложно, поскольку я уже больше года в этой сфере. 🌟 Какой у вас самый популярный и интересный квест в жанре романтика/хоррор? — Думаю, что «Орден кровавой луны: грехи забвенья». Этот квест част

1

26 Feb 2026, 20:06 UTC92 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сегодня на интервью был канал — @crimsonwingsangel 🌟 Как у вас возникла мысль создать канал и сложно было вам развиваться? Изначально идея создать канал не было моим. Но после того как владелец покинула проект канал остался у меня. Так что я решил создать другой новый канал. Crimson wings. Сложно ли развиваться? Да сложно. Я много чего все еще не понимаю. В начале даже не знал как заключается союзы или

🍓32❤‍🔥2💋1

26 Feb 2026, 16:22 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟 У канала @GloomyMagnificence стукнуло пол года🌟 Желаем им дальнейшего продвижения и расширения🌟

1

26 Feb 2026, 08:45 UTC438 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сегодня в альянсе "Tɦᥱ Wiᥒ᥊ 𑀝ᥣᥙδ" вышел коллаб. Участики коллаба: @Silver_Wavess @flowerscompani @interviewblacklady @questfromlena @ordenhornogozatnia @angelsdream_quest Всех участников благодарим за участие в коллабе.🌟

❤‍🔥21💋1

24 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC97 viewsread 12 August 2026

🧸🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Канал @strashnye_kvesty продает канал по причине переезда. Думаю в скором времени у вас купят канал и вы продвинетесь в новом🌟

24 Feb 2026, 13:56 UTC100 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧸🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Канал @strashnye_kvesty решил начать все с чистого листа и переехать в новый ( @Silver_Wavess ) Надеемся что в новом канале вы добьётесь хорошего актива и сможете добить больше подписчиков чем в том🌟

💋1

24 Feb 2026, 12:31 UTC123 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟❌🧸🌟🌟🌟 У канала @questfromlena поступил ап на этот канал — @angels_arthouse 🌟ладелец рассказал причину описав ее так — Я выпустила интерактивный пост: карту мира, где странами были каналы-союзы. Это был творческий формат — объединить всех в одну «планету» и рассказать историю её создания. Однако вместо диалога меня обвинили в воровстве и отказались даже выслушать объяснение. Если использование информации, котор

20 Feb 2026, 18:23 UTC158 viewsread 12 August 2026

Если что есть не только Tɦᥱ Wiᥒ᥊ 𑀝ᥣᥙδ Другие наставники тоже ищут к себе владельцев разных каналов)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kadr_dnua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 522,647 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ꮶᴀдᴩ Ꭰня” (@kadr_dnua), 29 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kadr_dnua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.