Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🪲-ˏˋ Жучине кодло ˊˎ - 🪲 18+

Channel

🪲-ˏˋ Жучине кодло ˊˎ - 🪲 18+

@kachkonis_kodlo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002551186484
TypeChannel
Username@kachkonis_kodlo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kachkonis_kodlo

Growth

258261259.58 August 2026 — 261 subscribers8 August 2026 — 261 subscribers15 August 2026 — 258 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258–261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:53258-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:04261no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:31261first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.2%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held15 (7 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total3,225
Reactions total345
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

444 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15935.8%
🔥11425.7%
❤‍🔥7116.0%
🍓316.98%
custom 5474532716126950024153.38%
custom 5426937696733901997143.15%
custom 5971806580868388661122.70%
👾112.48%
💋92.03%
🕊51.13%
custom 535956527636074703320.45%
🥰10.225%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
86
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
41
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kachkonis_kodlo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC110 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Run rabbit.. Run rabbit.. Run Run Run 🌸 🏹 #ЛуБайшен #Тайо

🔥2412👾2custom 53595652763607470331

31 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC150 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дякую за зірочки! Головному меценату чаєчці 😆

8❤‍🔥5🔥3🕊2

31 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC607 views51 reactions41 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

. Колаба з Бульйоном 💐 💐по Небесному уряднику . 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 «Лише зустрівши тебе, я знову зрозумів, як просто бути щасливим» 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 будемо дуже вдячні за реакти і інший актив

🔥20❤‍🔥13custom 5426937696733901997104🍓2👾2

31 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC133 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А ще спешал попередження, об 18:00 буде дроп тож щоб гарно поактівнічали~

10🔥3👾2custom 54745327161269500241

31 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC126 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Йооой тільки відволіклась, а вас вже 255! Хайооо всім новеньким хто таке гарне число добив рада всіх вітати^^

14🔥2custom 59718065808683886612

31 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC126 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чи не плануєте Ючі чи може адоптів? 🌱: мені сподобався перший досвід з ЮЧІ на Валентина тож я планую зробити їх ще раз, але не найближчим часом, мейбі на осінь А от адоптів цікаво було б спробувати (я маю ідеї на дизи), але звісно це залежить чи є на них попит ☺️ Якщо чесно я ще з весни про адоптів думаю тож на кінець літа напевно дропну пару штук, так що пильнуйте ✌️ Хаааай як справи? Чи будуть арти ще якихось фд

22❤‍🔥3🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC494 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знаю батя-птах вам сподобався, тож ось ще🍪 Трохи про нього: Лу взагалі оселився на окраїні селища в горах і відмовився заводити сім'ю, тож коли батько Тайо (хлопчика-манула) загинув він взяв малого до себе через обіцянки старому другу попіклуватись про нього в разі його загибелі. Хоч він в мене сварливий дєд-самітник, але з часом прив'язався до малого. Тому коли Шенгар (тигр) прийшов забрати його — Байшен пішов з ни

21custom 597180658086838866110🔥6❤‍🔥1👾1🕊1🥰1

18 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mroko_ua

Не можете вийти на протест? Підпишіть хоча б петицію і поширте серед знайомих. Так, це далеко не завжди працює, проте спільно - і петиціями, і протестами, і суспільним розголосом - будуватимемо кращу країну. https://itd.rada.gov.ua/petitions/Petition/Index/13812 https://itd.rada.gov.ua/petitions/Petition/Index/13822

2

17 Jul 2026, 20:53 UTC194 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не чекала що хтось знадає за анони, проте от вам нагадування! Можете задавати питання, я не кусаюсь🥰 Але це була саме та особиста тема що багато в чому мотивує мене у творчості, споглядання тіл як мистецтва, їх взаємодії Цікаво почути і що ви думаєте на цю тему!

7🍓4❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC199 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Анонімні питання! -У вас на аві ТГК, асексуальний флаг. Він тіки до теми з партнерами, чи вам неприємна уся ця тема? 🌱: Неждана анонімка на цікаву тему яку хочеться розписати 😊 Прапор стосується лише мене, адже я відношу себе до асексуального спектру людей що не мають тяги до фізичній близькості проте і не відчувають огиди бачити це Протеееее 👇 Мені ця тема цікава. Серед моїх персонажів є як ті що ведуть активне с

12❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC151 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Знаю що він би мене прокляв за цю прядь посеред лоба, але як мать я вирішила що йому так красівше💃

🍓8👾3custom 547453271612695002431❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC442 views45 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ще один мій синулік, знайомимось✌️ Сі́ріл Альбартер — чоловік чиє бажання контролю ситуації переросло у гріх жадібність. ''Це твій гріх. Жадоба офарбує твої руки у колір гнилі" Колишній полковник Прикордонного північного полку що перейшов до королівської варти заради кар'єри при дворі. Амбітний, дисциплінований, холоднокровний, вимогливий до себе й інших, терплячки йому не займати. Монети та золото його не цікавл

❤‍🔥2111🔥7🍓2💋2🕊1custom 54269376967339019971

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kachkonis_kodlo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 323,364 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪲-ˏˋ Жучине кодло ˊˎ - 🪲 18+” (@kachkonis_kodlo), 258 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kachkonis_kodlo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.