Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇫🇮𝑲𝒂𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒋𝒂 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏

@kaarijacf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004225228631
TypeChannel
Username@kaarijacf
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaarijacf

Growth

969 Aug 2026, 15:00 — 96 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:27 — 96 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:0010 Aug 2026, 01:27
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:2796no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:0096first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 96 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held11 (3 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total391
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52539014444273078811735.4%
custom 52224838789161675501531.3%
custom 54047690082872502331327.1%
custom 545874788668044213424.17%
custom 537091366228856609812.08%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC25 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

: 🕯: Мау Йере неанон мизи 〃゚ #тейк || бот — @anontakekaarijacfbot ┌★ @kaarijacf

custom 54047690082872502335custom 52224838789161675503custom 54587478866804421342custom 53709136622885660981

Signed тейки карья кф

8 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC42 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

: 🕯: ПРИВЕТ,ХОЧУ ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ ПАРОЧКУ СВОИХ РАБОТ С ЙЕРЕ 🤩 неанон мизи 〃゚ #тейк || бот — @anontakekaarijacfbot ┌★ @kaarijacf

custom 52539014444273078815custom 52224838789161675503custom 54047690082872502332

Signed тейки карья кф

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026

#вп

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @onlineshipscfPhoto

🍼🐏🐏online relationships cf🐏 👻[❤️] - хочу поделиться своей историей о инет-отнах .. 👻[🐸] - мне срочно нужны советы по интернет отношениям !! 👻👻🔆НАКОМО ⁉️ 👻👻👻👻тогда это точно for you 🥹 🥹навигация | вппост(0+) | own лука 🥹

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC28 viewsread 9 August 2026

#вп

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC26 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @PowerpuffGirlsCFPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Черт! Я сделал арт по пестику но нету кф куда можно было бы это скинуть! Хм... Может Эдит по суперкрошкам сделать? Только куда кинуть... Когда же найду хоть какой нибудь канал по Суперкрошкам кроме серий ? Где кф по суперкрошкам !? ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🅰️🅰️ 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Здесь вы сможете вспомнить и отправлять контент по такому популярному в свое время мультсериалу как: >>Суперкрошки<<

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026

#вп

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC26 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ErikaVikman_confessionVideo

✍️ - ’ Welcome to the 𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗞𝗔 𝗩𝗜𝗞𝗠𝗔𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 ✧''✨ 🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🔇 <🔎> ❗#take #adm #admtake #update #вп ❗ 𝗕𝗢𝗧 ❗ 𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧 ❗𝗔𝗗𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 ❗ 𝗩𝗣 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 🔎𝗦𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛 𝗔𝗗𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦!!! 🔝

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ ˖𐌺᥆ⲧ𑄝ⲃᴀּ ֶָ֢♱.۫ ׅ

8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

сторис 〃゚ #инста ||┌★ @kaarijacf

custom 52539014444273078812custom 52224838789161675501custom 54047690082872502331

7 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC38 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

новый пост 〃゚ #инста ||┌★ @kaarijacf

custom 52224838789161675506custom 52539014444273078814custom 54047690082872502333

3 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC76 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

от: tinechek 〃゚ #инста ||┌★ @kaarijacf

custom 52539014444273078816custom 52224838789161675502custom 54047690082872502332

Signed финн #bettan

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @kaarijacf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 866,117 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇫🇮𝑲𝒂𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒋𝒂 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏” (@kaarijacf), 96 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaarijacf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.