Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⏰️🔥⚔🛡 Escobar Paulus(Censurado)🛡⚔️🔥⏰️

@kB3RkYmRh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,393subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470182134
TypeChannel
Username@kB3RkYmRh
DescriptionUm palco para os hotspots da atualidade, Um canal para recarregar a alma. Uma janela de multiculturalismo, Uma lente através da história. ✝ CRUX DUM VOLVITUR ORBIS ⚔🛡 S̶ł VIS PΛCΣM - PΛЯΛ BΣLⱠVM 🐺 𝕀𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 ℙ𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕡𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 🦅
Created16 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kB3RkYmRh

Growth

19,39319,45719,4256 August 2026 — 19,457 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,450 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,436 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,430 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,424 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,414 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,401 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,400 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,393 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,383–19,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:2719,393-7
13 Aug 2026, 08:1619,400-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:2319,401-13
11 Aug 2026, 08:2319,414-10
10 Aug 2026, 05:5419,424-6
9 Aug 2026, 07:5119,430-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:5719,436-14
7 Aug 2026, 03:2319,450-7
6 Aug 2026, 18:3019,457no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:2019,457first reading

Engagement

164 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.53%
avg views ÷ 19,393 subscribers
Avg views / post
491
164 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
164
of 164 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 163 of 164 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held164 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total80,567
Reactions total2,111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
63,500
Videos
92,500
Links
21,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 42m
Average length
3m 59s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,111 reactions across 163 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥40619.2%
💊25412.0%
😎1909.00%
😈1587.48%
😱1276.02%
👀1165.50%
👍1145.40%
1044.93%
🤬974.59%
😢763.60%
🤨572.70%
502.37%
❤‍🔥452.13%
👏411.94%
🙏371.75%
🏆361.71%
🤯351.66%
🫡311.47%
🤡281.33%
😭231.09%
11 further kinds864.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 163 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 164 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kB3RkYmRh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 164 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC611 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👁🇧🇷👁⏰ O Brasil vive sob o reino da usura. A maior parte de nossos recursos, atualmente, se destinam ao pagamento da dívida pública, e é exatamente esta casta de banqueiros apátridas, que lucra com a eterna vampirização da pátria pelo sistema financeiro internacional, quem financia campanhas políticas a nível municipal, estadual e nacional.

💊63👍1😎1

Signed Escobar

14 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC626 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👁🇧🇷👁⏰ O controle judaico da imprensa não é uma questão de dinheiro. É uma questão de manter certas coisas fora da mente do público e colocar certas coisas nela.

💊8👍3😎31

Signed Escobar

14 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC581 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👁🇧🇷👁⏰ Eles estão rindo enquanto veem a raça humana cair em seus enganos.

💊8👍4😎21

Signed Escobar

14 Aug 2026, 01:09 UTC531 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👁🇧🇷👁⏰ Não há uma saída, solução ou melhora significativa ⁠para o mundo moderno. Esquerda ou direita. Conservadores ou liberais. Um acaba por se tornar destrutivo e o outro ineficaz. Cabe ao homem permanecer de pé entre as ruínas.

👍5💊3😎2

Signed Escobar

14 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC517 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👁🌎👁⏰ Como a sociedade moderna paga para ser escravizada.

4😎2💊1😢1

Signed Escobar

14 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC504 views11 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

👁🌎👁⏰ Este "homem-massa" é o homem previamente esvaziado de sua própria história, sem raízes no passado, e, por isso, dócil a todas as disciplinas chamadas internacionais. Mais do que um homem, é apenas uma casca de homem constituída por meros "ídolos de fora", carecendo de um interior, de uma intimidade própria, inexorável e inalienável, de um "eu" que não pode ser revogado. Por isso, está sempre disposto a fingir

💊6😎31👍1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC507 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🌐🤖👁⏰ CyberOne já trabalha em fábricas de carros elétricos. A Xiaomi confirmou que o seu robô humanoide CyberOne opera em linhas de montagem reais, manipulando peças irregulares e flexíveis com uma precisão de 98%. A empresa afirma que ele consegue manter turnos completos sem se cansar. O plano prevê a substituição de determinados processos atualmente realizados por pessoas nos próximos cinco anos. A Xiaomi ainda

🤨5🤬1😈1😱1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC546 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🔥🌎👁⏰ E eles nós chamam de conspiranóides...

💊5👍2🔥1😎1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC586 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🇨🇴🚨💥 CORRIDA CONTRA O TEMPO...

😢5👍1🤯1😨1😱1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC637 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🔥🌎🤖👁⏰ Será parecido com o filme Elysium, Cyberpunk 2077 ou Blade Runner 2045 antes de os humanos serem enviados para a Matrix.

😈6🔥3🤨1😎1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC674 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🌐🤖🧠👁⏰ A humanidade refém da nova ordem mundial.

😈7🔥3👀1😎1

Signed Escobar

13 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC580 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🌐🤖🧠👁⏰ QUARTA REVOLUÇÃO INDUSTRIAL . Lei 1: Um robô não pode ferir um ser humano ou, por omissão, permitir que um ser humano sofra algum mal. 2ª Lei: Um robô deve obedecer as ordens que lhe sejam dadas por seres humanos, exceto nos casos em que tais ordens entrem em conflito com a Primeira Lei. 3ª Lei: Um robô deve proteger sua própria existência desde que tal proteção não entre em conflito com a Primeira e/ou a Se

😎5🤔3🔥2🤨1

Signed Escobar

Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @kB3RkYmRh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@kB3RkYmRh edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,118 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⏰️🔥⚔🛡 Escobar Paulus(Censurado)🛡⚔️🔥⏰️” (@kB3RkYmRh), 19,393 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kB3RkYmRh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.