A que ponto chegamos... Que sociedade mais indolente, inútil é essa?
🤔1😡1

Channel
@fimdostemposbrasil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,490subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001238880242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fimdostemposbrasil |
| Description | 🌏 Notícias mundiais que a mídia omite. Análise estratégica, direta e sem filtros do cenário global e sinais do fim. Prepare-se! 🔗 Acesse: https://fimdostemposacademy.com |
| Created | 28 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fimdostemposbrasil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 29,490 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 29,492 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 29,496 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 29,498 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 29,508 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 29,514 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 29,525 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 29,536 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 29,546 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 29,553 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 29,551 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 29,565 | first reading |
250 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 250 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 227,688 |
| Reactions total | 4,624 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 187 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,624 reactions across 250 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😡 | 977 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 673 | 14.6% | |
| 🤣 | 556 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 526 | 11.4% | |
| 🤔 | 452 | 9.78% | |
| 😱 | 305 | 6.60% | |
| 🤯 | 252 | 5.45% | |
| 😢 | 233 | 5.04% | |
| ❤ | 227 | 4.91% | |
| 😐 | 226 | 4.89% | |
| 😁 | 89 | 1.92% | |
| 😭 | 72 | 1.56% | |
| 🏆 | 25 | 0.541% | |
| 🫡 | 11 | 0.238% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 250 of the 250 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,624reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A que ponto chegamos... Que sociedade mais indolente, inútil é essa?
🤔1😡1
Donald Trump alerta o mundo sobre o Brasil. Ele diz que todas as oportunidades foram dadas!
👏20👍2🤣2😁2😡2😐1
Pablo Marçal, que está inelegível, registra candidatura à Presidência. Preparando a pipoca para os debates...
😐15👏1😡1
Não vamos esquecer do Zelensky, o palhaço... O comediante palhaço, que chegou a presidência da Ucrânia com o papel de acelerar conflitos que levem a guerra Europa vs China e seus aliados!
🤔6😁2😡2🤣1😐1
Vídeo incrível de um meteoro, filmado pela aeromoça Alexandra Spasskaya no voo SU 1289 da Aeroflot, de Ulyanovsk para Moscou.
🤯6❤2
Essa é a essência do povo brasileiro! Isso, é algo que ninguém dos considerados primeiro mundo serão capazes de fazer. Nossos melhores costumes, a nossa ess6encia, refletem o coração de Deus, não temos a cultura de superioridade do resto do mundo. Vai na Europa e faça isso que o rapaz fez. Será tratado como um micróbio!
👏7❤4😡1
Tão bacana, tão correto... Que foi excluído da própria igreja e aceito pela Assembleia de Deus de Madureira! Que na verdade não é mais Assembleia de Deus, a história é longa... Otoni de Paula é um dos parasitas deste Brasil!
👍10😡8🤣4❤1😁1
Lula diz que vai prender quem se acha dono de favela! Agora, é tarde demais... Hipócrita! Discursos mentirosos... Ele deixa claro que, precisa mudar a constituição! Medo dos EUA!
🤣9😡6❤3😐1
Centenas de imigrantes ilegais se reuniram na praia de Trampolín, em Ceuta, acenando com bandeiras espanholas e exigindo asilo. Alguns seguravam cartazes com a frase: "Sem retorno para o Marrocos".
😡8🤣2❤1
🇺🇸 Enquanto isso, na América... Veja como eles utilizam os chemtrails para mudar o clima
😡9
🇺🇸 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON: Isso simplesmente não faz sentido. O incêndio "cruzou" o rio Spokane e destruiu completamente este bairro de um clube de tiro... ele desapareceu. Só restam árvores. A melhor ideia para um morador local seria: Construir minha casa inteiramente na árvore para que ela não queime em "incêndios florestais".
🤔9👍1
ÚLTIMA HORA - Jared Kushner, enviado de Trump, afirma que o desarmamento do Hamas poderá começar em 30 dias.
👍9🤔3❤1😐1😡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 250 posts we hold for @fimdostemposbrasil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quando a agenda globalista através dos EUA apresentar os 👽🛸, você irá amá-los e aceitá-los como seus irmãos?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 709,224 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fim dos Tempos | Geopolítica e Notícias Globais” (@fimdostemposbrasil), 29,490 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fimdostemposbrasil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.