Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🫶🏻小妖精全台選妃班表

Channel

🫶🏻小妖精全台選妃班表

@k6k93u

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

848subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001464479367
TypeChannel
Username@k6k93u
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/k6k93u

Growth

819848833.57 August 2026 — 819 subscribers7 August 2026 — 819 subscribers7 August 2026 — 821 subscribers15 August 2026 — 840 subscribers22 August 2026 — 848 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 815–852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 12:56848+8
15 Aug 2026, 03:07840+19
7 Aug 2026, 12:36821+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:33819no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:24819first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.6%
avg views ÷ 848 subscribers
Avg views / post
387
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,870
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💓客評 💓 謝謝哥哥的分享❤️ 大乃乃😁😁 想要解鎖高顏值貼心溫暖的服務 像回家一樣 年紀:23歲 身高:165-167 外貌:很靚麗 體重:48kg 罩杯:Ecup 有無刺青:無 約會體驗:很舒服的約會 爆乳妹皮膚很白 一起洗完澡躺在床上幫我吹 自己主動坐上來搖 戴著眼鏡很嫵媚 會拋媚眼 結束有按摩聊天 相處很愉快 重點臉蛋很正 整體約會ㄉ評分:9分 妹妹需要改善的:需要多報班 對小妖精的評價:很會推薦 很真實的茶姐 不廢話很直爽 是否想要回約:當然會 點擊看莉莉的照片

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀莉莉 167cm.E奶.48kg.23歲 #一線鮑魚 穴緊水多 鮮嫩粉 清純耐看外貌 骨感身材大奶妹 熱情女友互動征服了幾位試車的哥哥 活潑愛笑 相處起來完全沒有壓力 超好配合還有按摩、還會射後吸哦 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 ⬇️⬇️ 莉莉的大乃乃客評 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC585 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀性感麻豆 #高挑爆乳 妖姬➡️165cm・48kg・E奶・26歲 顏值高 服務技術 + 身材顏值 性感圓翹像電動馬達一樣超會搖 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀性感瑜伽老師 恬欣 164cm・48kg・D奶・23歲 陽光甜美喜歡運動的女孩 主動會玩 床上嫵媚姿態超級誘人 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC69 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀薇薇 164- D奶- 47kg- 26歲 床上粉淫蕩風騷 騷的出水的女生 蜜穴很濕 配合度粉高唷 妹妹很喜歡被深深的進入 會一直的浪叫 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀蜜妮 157公分.E罩杯.28歲 開放不喜歡制式 只會在床上爽 脾氣好姿勢隨意 身型嬌小大奶好操 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC63 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀娜娜 161cm D杯 50kg 27歲 豐乳肥臀的成熟體態 皮膚白裡透紅 動作協調性極強 任何姿勢都能自然配合臉蛋精緻帶笑容 私處軟綿且敏感度高適合長時間把玩 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC67 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

茶茶 165cm 大E奶 24歲 48kg 燕燕 164cm 大D奶 25歲 50kg #雙飛 從大學兩個人就開始形影不離 是情義很深厚的閨蜜情 兩個人什麼都可以配合 情趣姐妹裝 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀娜娜 168cm 49kg D奶 33歲 火辣辣的肉體 修長美腿加大奶 風情萬種很會撩 讓你一下就爆漿 老點紅牌回沖率99% 需提前預約 會引導勾起你慾望 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @k6k93u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,224 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🫶🏻小妖精全台選妃班表” (@k6k93u), 848 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k6k93u.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.