Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 氣質輕熟の熟女區

Channel

氣質輕熟の熟女區

@ayay45y

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

304subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003884634519
TypeChannel
Username@ayay45y
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ayay45y

Growth

2683042867 August 2026 — 268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 268 subscribers14 August 2026 — 291 subscribers22 August 2026 — 303 subscribers28 August 2026 — 304 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–309 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 12:02304+1
22 Aug 2026, 06:18303+12
14 Aug 2026, 21:54291+23
8 Aug 2026, 08:50268no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:33268first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.2%
avg views ÷ 304 subscribers
Avg views / post
192
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.592%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held11 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,112
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀文姐 162cm B奶 47kg 32歲 熟女 氣質姐姐 小騷貨一枚 私下經常自慰 也愛玩玩具 配合高 很聽話 服務方面都願意配合 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

8 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀雨婷 162cm 47kg D杯 32歲 69 奶炮 小親親 不在話下 本人 主動熱情很會挑逗類型 慾望大不說 還能自己找新鮮感覺互動給你 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

7 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀冰兒 163cm 52kg F杯 30歲 膚白皙光滑 歐美身材 純天然無整 私處緊緻 三點粉嫩多汁 溫柔體貼的大姐姐 奶炮爽翻你讓你直呼受不了 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀佩玲 164cm 48kg E杯 36歲 成熟的包容力 只想把你寵上天 任何要求都答應 任何姿勢都配合 讓你射到腿軟叫不出聲 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

6 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀蕾蕾 162cm 58kg G 28歲 深藏不露的極品辣妹 衣服根本包不住那種澎湃感 性格大膽直接 對服務非常有熱情 絕對是你沒體驗過的視覺與觸覺震撼 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

2

6 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC103 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀蘇蘇 160cm 47kg E奶 30歲 超軟超挺超好揉 長的漂亮聲音甜美 陪你搖一整夜不停歇 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 全台班表 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 : t.me/k6k93 ⭐Gleezy : xuan6(加入送1k現金劵)

2 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC876 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀若薇 165cm/F奶/50/25歲 不科學的身材!但極度胸猛 最愛餵哥哥吃奶 看著哥哥快要窒息😍 卻又一臉幸福的樣子 就會很想要幫哥哥全部吸出來 ~ 可別在前戲就被KO 因為女上的風景才真的是~ 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 備用全台班表 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 tg選妹預約ID:@k6k93 ⭐Gleezy(APP)ID: xuan6 點擊密我預約:https://t.me/k6k93

1 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC235 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀 妙妙 160/C/46kg28歲 外表文靜淑女 內心悶騷 床上技術精灒 喜歡挑戰高難度性愛姿勢一定是你不曾見證過讓你很滿足的慾女 小妖精選妃班表 學生妹專區 備用全台班表 小妖精優質熟女區 素人外流視頻約炮 加📱ID:hhe789 小妖精📱 tg選妹預約ID:@k6k93 ⭐Gleezy(APP)ID: xuan6 點擊密我預約:https://t.me/k6k93

1 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC175 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @k6k93uPhoto

7月告一段落啦~✨ 迎接8月的第一天開始🥰 謝謝哥哥們七月對小妖精的支持照顧跟捧場❤️你們每一次的信任,對我來說都是很大的動力。 八月也會繼續努力, 面試更多優質的妹妹推薦給大家,不讓大家失望💕 希望8月也能順順利利,跟大家一起越來越好~

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ayay45y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 81,260 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“氣質輕熟の熟女區” (@ayay45y), 304 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayay45y.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.